Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Long-term variation of macrobenthos in a mesohaline region of Chesapeake Bay

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Macrobenthic species abundances and physical/chemical factors known of affect them were measured in a mesohaline region of the Chesapeake Bay from 1971 to 1982. Variation in species abundance due to station differences, seasonal patterns and year-to-year fluctuations in physical/chemical factors were quantified. The major source of variation in abundance of most species was that associated with seasonal recruitment cycles. Spatial variation in abundances of dominant species was small within habitats defined by sediment characteristics. However, abundance variation among sediment types was relatively large. All species showed significant year-to-year fluctuation in abundance, but no species had systematic long-term increases or decreases in abundance during the study period. Macrobenthos populations were persistent over the 11 years within abundance boundaries defined chiefly by fluctuations in salinity and dissolved oxygen concentration. Most species responded to salinity changes, especially those of an extreme nature, with predictable increases or decreases in abundance. Abundances of all species declined rapidly under conditions of low dissolved oxygen concentration (<2 ppm). Macrobenthos with planktonic developmental stages rapidly repopulated the region following periods of population decline. Repopulation by brooding species was slower.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allen, T. F. H. 1977. Scale in microscopic algal ecology: a neglected dimension.Phycologia 16:253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltimore Gas and Electric Company. 1976. Beach erosion surveys, p. 15.2-1–15.2-3.In Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, R. B. 1967. The sediments of Chesapeake Bay, p. 239–260.In G. H. Lauff (ed.), Estuaries. Publication No. 83. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C. I. 1970. Statistics in Biology. Vol. II, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. 639 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F. 1973. Classification and community structure of macrobenthos in Hampton Roads area, Virginia.Mar. Biol. 21:226–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F. 1977a. A new look at the benthos along the estuarine gradient, p. 245–266.In B. C. Coull (ed.), Ecology of Marine Benthos. Belle W. Baruch Library in Marine Science, Vol. 6. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F. 1977b. Application of numerical classifications in ecological investigations of water pollution. Virginia Institute of Marine Science Special Scientific Report No. 77. 114 p.

  • Boesch, D. F., andR. Rosenberg. 1981. Responses to stress in marine benthic communities, p. 179–200.In G. W. Barrett and R. Rosenberg (eds.), Stress Effects on Natural Ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F., M. L. Waas, andR. W. Virnstein. 1976a. The dynamics of estuarine benthic communities, p. 176–196.In M. Wiley (ed.), Estuarine Processes, Vol. I. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F., R. J. Diaz, andR. W. Virnstein. 1976b. Effects of tropical storm Agnes on soft-bottom macrobenthic communities of the James and York estuaries and the lower Chesapeake Bay.Chesapeke Sci. 17:246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. B., M. Sheader, andP. F. Kingston. 1978. Sources of variability in the benthic macrofauna off the south Northumberland Coast, 1971–1976.J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 58:191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R. 1967. Ecology of estuarine benthic invertebrates: a perspective, p. 442–487.In G. H. Lauff (ed.), Estuaries. Publication No. 83. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, H. H., R. J. Regier, E. W. Schiemer, and J. A. Michael. 1978. the summertime vertical distribution of dissolved oxygen at the Calvert Cliffs generating station: a physical interpretation. Chesapeake Bay Institute, The Johns Hopkins University. Special Report 60, Reference 78-1.

  • Castagna, M., andP. Chanley. 1973. Salinity tolerance of some marine bivalves from inshore and estuarine environments in Virginia waters of the mid-Atlantic Coast.Malacologia 12:47–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, L. N., andJ. A. Musick. 1977. Life history, feeding habitats, and functional morphology of juvenile sciaenid fishes in the York River estuary.Fish. Bull. 75:657–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H., andW. P. Sousa. 1983. On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence.Am. Nat. 121:788–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J. 1971. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 462 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coull, B. C. 1985. The use of long-term biological data to generate testable hypotheses.Estuaries 8: 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, D. M., C. A. Maybury, andR. M. Ewing. 1981. Feeding biology and general ecology of several spionid polychaetes from the Chesapeake Bay.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 54:21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, D. M., R. M. Ewing, G. H. Tourtellotte, W. T. Harlan, J. W. Sourbeer, andH. R. Barker, Jr. 1982 Predation. resource limitation and the structure of benthic infaunal communities of the lower Chesapeake Bay.Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. 67: 477–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P. K. 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community.Ecol. Monogr. 41:341–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, R. J. 1984. Short-term dynamics of the dominant annelids in a polyhaline temperate estuary.Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. 115:153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, R. A. 1975. Natural fluctuations in a soft bottom benthic community.J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 55:865–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, R. W., andJ. A. Younk. 1983. Estuarine benthos: long-term community structure variations, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas.Estuaries 6:126–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassle, J. F., andJ. P. Grassle. 1974. Opportunistic life histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes.J. Mar. Res. 32:253–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hires, R. I., E. D. Stroup, and R. C. Seitz. 1963. Atlas of the distribution of dissolved oxygen and pH in Chesapeake Bay 1949–1961. The Johns Hopkins University, Chesapeake Bay Institute, Graphical Summary Report 5, Reference No. 63-4.

  • Holland, A. F., N. K. Mountford, andJ. A. Mihursky. 1977. Temporal variation in Upper Bay mesohaline benthic communities: I. The 9-m mud habitat.Chesapeake Sci. 18:370–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. F., N. K. Mountford, M. Hiegel, D. Cargo, and J. A. Mihursky. 1979. Results of benthic studies at Calvert Cliffs, final report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Power Plant Siting Program. Annapolis, Maryland. Report No. PPSP-MP-28.

  • Holland, A. F., N. K. Mountford, M. H. Hiegel, K. R. Kaumeyer, andJ. A. Hihursky. 1980. The influence of predation on infaunal abundance in upper Chesapeake Bay.Mar. Biol. 57:221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M., andD. A. Wolfe. 1973. Non-parametric Statistical Methods. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 503 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. G. 1967. The vertical distribution of the infauna of a sand flat.Ecology 48:571–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lie, U., andR. A. Evans. 1973. Long-term variability in the structure of subtidal benthic communities in Puget Sound, Washington, USA.Mar. Biol. 21:122–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippson, A. J., M. S. Haire, A. F. Holland, F. Jacobs, J. Jensen, R. L. Moran-Johnson, T. T. Polgar, andW. A. Richkus. 1979. Environmental Atlas of the Potomac Estuary. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland. 280 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loi, T., andB. J. Wilson. 1979. Macroinfaunal structure and effects of thermal discharges in a mesohaline habitat of Chesapeake Bay, near a nuclear power plant.Mar. Biol. 55:3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin Marietta Corporation. 1980. Summary of findings: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant aquatic monitoring program. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Power Plant Siting Program, Annapolis, Maryland. Referece No. PPSP-CC-80-2.

  • Mountford, N. K., A. F. Holland, andJ. A. Mihursky. 1977. Identification and description of macrobenthic communities in the Calvert Cliffs region of the Chesapeake Bay.Chesapeake Sci. 18: 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, C. B. 1947. Environmental characteristics of a river estuary.J. Mar. Res. 6:147–174.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, F. H., and J. K. Thompson. 1985. Persistence of an introduced mudflat community in South San Francisco Bay, California.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. (in press).

  • Officer, C. B., R. B. Biggs, J. L. Taft, L. E. Cronin, M. H. Tyler, andW. R. Boynton. 1984. Chesapeake Bay anoxia: origin, development, and significance.Science 223:22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. S. 1971. Observations on the planktonic larvae ofPolydora ligni Webster (Polychaeta: Spionidae) in the York River, Virginia.Chesapeake Sci. 12:121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, E., andA. O’Connell. 1981. Animal Sediment Relationships of the Upper and Central Chesapeake Bay. Maryland Geological Survey, Baltimore, Maryland. 49 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubel, J. R., H. H. Carter, E. W. Schiemer, andR. C. Whaley. 1972. A case study of littoral drift based on long-term patterns of erosion and deposition.Chesapeake Sci. 13:80–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. N. 1965. Seasonal setting patterns of five species of bivalves in the Tred Avon River, Maryland.Chesapeake Sci. 6:33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., andF. J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 776 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. 1982. Marine Environmental Assessment Chesapeake Bay, Annual Summary 1981. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virnstein, R. W. 1977. The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay.Ecology 58:1199–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watling, L. 1975. Analysis of structural variations in a shallow estuarine deposit-feeding community.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 19:275–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weins, J. A. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7:81–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodin, S.A. 1976. Refuges, disturbance, and community structure: a marine soft-bottom example.Ecology 59:274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegelmeier, E. 1978. Macrobenthos investigations in the eastern part of the German Bight from 1959 to 1974.Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer. 172:432–444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Martin Marietta Environmental Systems, 9200 Rumsey Road, 21045, Columbia, Maryland

    A. F. Holland

Authors
  1. A. F. Holland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holland, A.F. Long-term variation of macrobenthos in a mesohaline region of Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 8, 93–113 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/1351860

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1351860

Keywords

Search

Navigation