Skip to main content
Log in

Growth of the Bay Scallop, Argopecten irradians, fes an artificial diet rich in protein

  • Short Papers and Notes
  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bay scallops had minimal shell growth and lost weight on an artificial diet rich in protein (Purina’ Trout Chow’) even though they ingested the food. Two concentrations of food were used, one simulating natural levels of particulate organic carbon and another approximately 20 times the first concentration. These results and those of others indicate that high protein, artificial diets cannot be assimilated by bivalves even though phytoplankton, their natural food, is high in protein. The data suggest caution in establishing estuarien food chains based only upon food quality, quantity, and ingestion without regard to assimilation or growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Banse, K. 1974. On interpretation of data for the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of phytoplankton.Limnol. Oceanogr. 19:695–699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Smith, R. L. 1975. The effect of concentration of suspension and inert material on the assimilation of algae by three bivalves.J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K. 55: 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haven, D. S. 1965. Supplemental feeding of oysters with starch.Chesapeake Science 6:43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby-Smith, W. W. 1970. Growth of the scallops,Argopecten irradians concentricus (Bay) andArgopecten gibbus (Linne), as influenced by food and tempere. Ph.D. Thesis, Duke University, Durham, N.C. 126 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1974. Suspension feeding aquaculture systems: effects of phytoplankton concentration and temperature on growth of the bay scallop.Aquaculture 3:135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1976. The detritus problem and the feeding and digestion of an estuarine organism.In M. L. Wiley (Ed.), Estuarine Processes. Vol. I. Uses, Stresses, and Adaptation to the Estuary. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, D. W., andR. F. Vaccaro. 1964. The measurement of dissolved and particulate carbon in sea-water.Limnol. Oceanogr. 9:138–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R. 1965. The role of detritus in the nutrition of two marine deposit feeders, the prosobranchHydrobia ulvae and the bivalveMacoma balthica.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 144:25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. 1974. Feeding and digestion in the bivalvia.Adv. Comp. Phys. Biochem. 5:1–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell-Hunter, W. D. 1970. Aquatic Productivity. MacMillan Co., New York, 306 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, S. A., W. K. Harens, and R. M. Ingle. 1976. Quality improvement of oysters,Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin), using artificial foods, Fla. Mar. Res. Pub. No. 20. 16 p.

  • Winter, J. 1974. Growth inMytilus edulis using different types of food.Ber. dt. Wiss. Kommn. Meeresforsch. 23: 360–375.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burle, E., Kirby-Smith, W.W. Growth of the Bay Scallop, Argopecten irradians, fes an artificial diet rich in protein. Estuaries 2, 206–208 (1979). https://doi.org/10.2307/1351739

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1351739

Keywords

Navigation