Skip to main content
Log in

The status of the scup (Stenotomus chrysops) in winter trawl fishery

  • Published:
Chesapeake Science

Abstract

Commercial landings of scup were sampled at Hampton, Virginia, to obtain estimates of the size and age composition of the catch. The size composition of the catch varied during the fishing season and the polymodal nature of the length-frequency distribution indicated a number of age groups present in the catch. Scales and otoliths were examined to ascertain the age structure of the catch. Inconsistent sculpturing of scales from the same fish and failure to delineate entire rings on the scale past the first two rings did not permit aging of fish suspected of being older than two years. Annular marks on otoliths were not resolved. The length-weight relationship was derived. It is suggested that the scup resource is being over-exploited. Both total landings of scup throughout their range and catch per trip of the winter trawler fleet have declined. Small fish, by market sorting standards, have become an increasingly important component of the landed catch because of the scarcity of larger fish. A larger meshed trawl net is recommended to permit escapement of small fish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bigelow, Henry B., andWilliam C. Schroeder. 1953. Fishes of the Gulf of Maine.U. S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Fish. Bull. 53(74):411–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John R. 1962. The 1960 salt-water angling survey.U.S. Dept. Interior, Bur. of Sport Fish. and Wildl., Circ. 153, 36 p.

  • Edwards, R. L., Robert Livingston, Jr., and Paul E. Hamer. 1962. Winter water temperatures and an annotated list of fishes—Nantucket Shoals to Cape Hatteras. Albatross III Cruise No. 126.U. S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Spec. Sci. Rept. Fish. No. 397. 31 p.

  • Graham, Michael. 1956. Plaice, p. 332–371.In: Sea fisheries, Ed. by M. Graham. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, Robert A., and William C. Neville. 1935. Conditions affecting the southern winter trawl fishery.U. S. Bur. Fish., Circ. 18, 12 p.

  • Neville, William C., and G. B. Talbot. 1964. The fishery of scup with special reference to fluctuations in yield and their causes.U. S. Fish. and Wildl. Serv., Spec. Sci. Rept. Fish. No. 459, 61 p.

  • Pearson, John C. 1932. Winter trawl fishery off the Virginia and North Carolina coasts.U. S. Bur. Fish., Invest. Rept. 10, 31 p.

  • U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1942–1966.Fishery Statistics of the United States, 1939–1963.Statistical Digests 1, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 27, 30, 34, 36, 39, 41, 43, 44, 49, 51, 53, 54, 56, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 284 from the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virginia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, W.G., Norcross, J.J. The status of the scup (Stenotomus chrysops) in winter trawl fishery. Chesapeake Science 9, 207–216 (1968). https://doi.org/10.2307/1351311

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1351311

Keywords

Navigation