Abstract
Lengths of 14,508 weakfish from pound-net catches in Chesapeake Bay during the 1954–58 period showed little variation from year to year; modal lengths ranged from 220 to 235 mm. Spring catches included larger fish than were taken in summer and fall. Age composition, based on scale samples from 4,516 fish, changed little from year to year and was estimated as: 62 per cent, 1-year olds; 28 per cent, 2-year olds; 8 per cent, 3-year olds; and 1 per cent, 4-year olds. Two- and 3-year old fish dominated spring catches, 1-year old the summer and fall catches. Annual catch per net ranged from 50,000 to 70,000 pounds. In some months almost half of the catch was utilized as scrap. A single year class (1955) contributed about 200,000 fish per net. Before conclusions may be drawn concerning fishing mortality or the effect of the Virginia fishery on weakfish stocks further north, the complex migratory patterns of weakfish must be more clearly known.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Daiber, F. C. 1956. The growth ofCynoscion regalis in Delaware Bay with thoughts on its significance.Univ. Del. Mar. Lab. Ref. 56–19:1–6.
Higgins, E. J. andJ. C. Pearson. 1927. Examination of the summer fisheries of Pamlico and Core Sounds, N. C., with special reference to the destruction of the undersized fish and the protection of the gray trout,Cynoscion regalis (Bloch and Schneider).Rept. U. S. Comm. Fish. 1927, App. II, Bur. Fish. Doc. (1019):29–64.
Hildebrand, S. F. andW. C. Schroeder. 1928. Fishes of Chesapeake Bay.U. S. Bur. Fish. Bull. 43(1):1–366.
Massmann, W. H. 1955. Migratory fishes, p. 40–6.In: Commission of Fisheries of Virginia, 56th and 57th Annual Reports (1954–5). Richmond.
—. 1963. Annulus formation on the scales of weakfish,Cynoscion regalis in Chesapeake Bay.Chesapeake Sci. 4(1):54–56.
—. 1958. Distribution and abundance of gray weakfish in the York River system, Virginia.Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf. 23:361–9.
McHugh, J. L. 1960. The pound-net fishery in Virginia. Part 2. Species composition of landings reported as menhaden.Comm. Fish. Rev. 22(2):1–16.
Nesbit R. A. 1954. Weakfish migration in relation to its conservation.U. S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Spec. Sci. Rept. Fish. (115):1–81.
Perlmutter, A. W., W. S. Miller, andJ. C. Poole. 1956. The weakfish,Cynoscion regalis, in New York waters.N. Y. Fish & Game J. 3(1):1–43.
Power, E. A. 1958. Fishery statistics of the United States. 1956.U. S. Fish & Wildl. Serv. Statist. Dig. (43):172–96.
—. 1959. Fishery statistics of the United States. 1957.U. S. Fish & Wildl. Serv. Statist. Dig. (44):157–75.
— 1960. Fishery statistics of the United States. 1958.U. S. Fish & Wildl. Serv. Statist. Dig. (49):157–75.
Reid, G. K. 1955. The pound-net fishery in Virginia. Part I. History, gear description, and catch.Comm. Fish. Rev. 17(5):1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contribution No. 128 of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virgnia.
Formerly, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virginia
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Massmann, W.H. Age and size composition of weakfish,Cynoscion regalis, from pound nets in Chesapeake Bay, Virginia 1954–1958. Chesapeake Science 4, 43–51 (1963). https://doi.org/10.2307/1351295
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1351295