Abstract
Measurements comparable to those listed by Bigelow and Schroeder are recorded along with the proportional dimensions in percent of total length for an adult male and female bull shark,Carcharhinus leucas. These specimens were captured on successive days in the same pound net in Chesapeake Bay near Galesville, Maryland. Comments on gonad condition of the female, as well as the stomach contents, are included. Eels and white perch are added to the known food of this species. The pH of the stomach fluid was 3.7. Ten adult specimens have authentically been recorded (1956–1959) 61 to 119 miles above the mouth of Chesapeake Bay. Although no general pattern of unusually high water temperatures or salinities was noted for these years, speculation on the appearance of this species this far north is proposed, linked to the increased warming oceanic waters.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Baughman, J. L. 1950. Random notes on Texas fishesPt. 1, Tex. Jour. Sci. 2(1):117–138.
— andS. Springer. 1950. Biological and economic notes on the sharks of the Gulf of Mexico, with especial reference to those of Texas, and with a key for their identification.Amer. Midl. Nat. 44(1):96–152.
Beebe, W. J. andJ. Tee Van. 1933. Field book of shore fishes of Bermuda.G. P. Putnam & Sons, N.Y. xiv + 336.
Bell, J. C. andJ. T. Nichols 1921. Notes on the food of Carolina sharks.Copeia (92):17–20.
Bigelow, H. B. and W. C. Schroder. 1948. Fishes of the Western North AtlanticSears Found. for Mar. Research, Pt. I, Mem. No. I, pp. 337–346
Darnell, R. M. 1958. Food habits of fishes and larger invertebrates of Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, an estuarine community.Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. Texas, 5:353–416.
Fowler, H. W. 1907. A supplementary account of fishes of New Jersey.Ann. Rept. N. J. State Mus. 3(1906):251–384.
— 1908. Notes on sharks.Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila, 60:53–70.
Gudger, E. W. 1940. The breeding habits, reproductive organs and external embryonic development ofChlamydoselachus, based on notes and drawings by Bashford Dean.Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bashford Dean Mem. Vol. pp. 525–633.
Gunter, G. 1938. Notes on invasion of fresh water by fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, with reference to the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River System.Copeia (2):69–72.
Jordan, D. S. andMary C. Dickerson 1908. Notes on a collection of fishes from the Gulf of Mexico at Vera Cruz and Tampico.Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 34:11–22.
— andB. W. Evermann 1896. The fishes of North and Middle America.Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus. 47(1):39.
— andC. H. Gilbert. 1882 Notes on fishes observed about Pensacola, Florida, and Galveston, Texas, with description of a new species.Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 5:241–307.
Linton, E. 1904. Parasites of fish of Beaufort.Bull. U. S. Bur. Fish. 24:321–428.
Myers, G. S. 1952. Sharks and sawfishes in the Amazon.Copeia (4):268–269.
Nichols, J. T. 1917. Ichthyological notes from a cruise off southwest Florida with description ofGobiesox yuma, sp. n.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 37:873–877.
— andC. M. Breder, Jr. 1927. The marine fishes of New York and southern New England.Zoologica 9(1):1–192.
Oceanus. 1957. [Photograph of bull shark]. Oceanus for 1956–57, 5(1–2):34.
Schwartz, F. J. 1959. Two eight-foot cub sharks,Carcharhinus leucas (Muller and Henle), captured in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland.Copeia (3):251–252.
Springer, S. 1938. Notes on the sharks of Florida.Proc. Fla. Acad. Sci. 3:9–41.
— 1940. The sex ratio and seasonal distribution of some Florida sharks.Copeia (3):188–194.
Springer, S. 1950. An outline for a Trinidad shark fishery.Proc. 2nd Ann. Sess. Gulf and Caribbean Fish. Inst., pp. 17–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contribution No. 139, Maryland Department of Research and Education, Solomons, Maryland.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwartz, F.J. Additional comments on adult bull sharksCarcharhinus leucas (Müller and Henle), from Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. Chesapeake Science 1, 68–71 (1960). https://doi.org/10.2307/1350539
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1350539