Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary report on attracting fish by oyster-shell plantings in Chincoteague Bay, Maryland

  • Published:
Chesapeake Science

Abstract

Oyster-shell plantings were made on formerly productive bottom to determine the practicability of securing an oyster set in this area and to test the hypothesis that the availability of game fish could be improved by artificially modifying the habitat in Chincoteague Bay, Maryland. Fish populations were trapped over planted and unplanted control areas with the same effort from August to November in 1958 and 1959. Fourteen species of saltwater fish were recorded in the planted and control areas, of which the black sea bass,Centropristes striatus, was the dominant species.

The planted areas yielded about three times as many fish as the controls during the two years. Black sea bass numbers were much greater on planted areas than on control areas. The planted area also produced more species than the unplanted area. More fish were caught over both planted and control bottoms during 1959 than in 1958, due partially to improved trap design. There is some evidence of improvement in the availability of fish over a planted area that has aged for a year. It is concluded that oyster-shell plantings significantly concentrated and increased numbers of fish over restricted areas, when compared to unplanted areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Covel, C. 1959. Ocean City offers much to fishermen.In Washington Area Fishing Guide.The Washington Evening Star Newspaper, pp. 1–12.

  • Pritchard, D. W. 1960. Salinity balance and renewal time for Chincoteague Bay.Chesapeake Sci. 1(1):48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieling, F. W. 1954. Hurricane damaged oyster and clam areas in Chincoteague Bay.Md. Tidewater News 11(7):2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1955. Hydrographic study of Chincoteague Bay yields new data.Ibid. 11(12):2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieling, F. W. 1957. Chemical and physical data of Chincoteague Bay area, June 1953–December 1956.Md. Dept. Research & Educ. Ref. No. 57-25:1–93.

  • — 1958. Low salinity and unusual biological conditions noted in Chincoteague Bay.Md. Tidewater News 14(4):15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieling, F. W. 1960. The resources of Worcester County coastal waters (Summary of existing data, January 1960).Md. Dept. Research & Educ. Ref. No. 60-10:1–17.

  • — andJ. W. McGary. 1952. Preliminary report on the Cincoteague Bay survey.Proc. Nat. Shellfish. Assoc. 43:194–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, C. L. 1953. A study of tidal lagoon sediment in Chincoteague Bay, Maryland.A thesis submitted to the Dept. of Geology, Princeton Univ.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 137, Maryland Department of Research and Education, Solomons, Maryland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arve, J. Preliminary report on attracting fish by oyster-shell plantings in Chincoteague Bay, Maryland. Chesapeake Science 1, 58–65 (1960). https://doi.org/10.2307/1350537

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1350537

Keywords

Navigation