Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 493–511 | Cite as

Sibling models of socioeconomic effects on the timing of first premarital birth

  • Daniel A. PowersEmail author
  • James Cherng-Tay Hsueh
Fertility and Contraception

Abstract

Data on 1,090 pairs ofsisters from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth are used to estimate the effects of observed individual-level factors, common family-level variables, and shared unobserved family-level traits on the timing of premarital births. Results show a moderate correlated risk of premarital childbearing among siblings after controlling for the effects of measured covariates. The effect of older sisters’ out-of-wedlock childbearing on the timing of younger sisters’ premarital birth is overestimated when shared unmeasured family-level traits are ignored. Public policy measures designed to reduce premarital births have a smaller multiplier effect via reduced younger sisters’ premarital births because unmeasured family-level factors are less amenable to policy measures. However, because the older-sibling effect is large when other sources of variability in premarital birth timing are controlled, interventions may be effective in reducing premarital births among young women in high-risk families.

Keywords

Young Sibling Young Sister High School Grad Premarital Birth Censor Regression Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, E. 1989. “Sex Codes and Family Life Among Poor Inner City Youths.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 501:59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. 1991. “Neighborhood Effects on Teenage Pregnancy.” Pp. 375–98 in The Urban Underclass, edited by C. Jencks and P.E. Peterson. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  3. Avery, R.B. and V.J. Hotz. 1985. HotzTran User ’s Manual. Unpublished Manuscript, Economics Research CenterINationa1 Opinion Research Center, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Center for Human Resource Research. 1979. The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Handbook. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamberlain, G. and Z. Gri1iches. 1977. “More on Brothers.” Pp. 97–124 in Kinometrics: Determinants of Socioeconomic Success Within and Between Families, edited by P. Taubman. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Clayton, D. 1978. “A Model for Association in Bivariate Life Tables and Its Application in Epidemiological Studies of Familial Tendency in Chronic Disease Incidence.” Biometrika 65: 141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, D.R. and Snell E.J. 1968. “A General Definition of Residuals.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 30:248–75.Google Scholar
  9. Crane, J. 1991. “Effects of Neighborhoods on Dropping Out of School and Teenage Childbearing.” Pp. 299–320 in, The Urban Underclass, edited by C. Jencks and P.E. Peterson. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  10. Duncan, G.J. and S.D. Hoffman. 1990. “Welfare Benefits, Economic Opportunities, and Out-of-Wedlock Births Among Black Teenage Girls.” Demography 27:519–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Festinger, L. 1954. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.” Human Relations 7:263–90.Google Scholar
  12. Friede, A., C.J. Hogue, L.L. Doyle, C.R. Hammerslough, J.E. Sniezek, and A. Arrighi. 1986. “Do the Sisters of Childbearing Teenagers Have Increased Rates of Childbearing?” American Journal of Public Health 76: 1221–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griliches, Z. 1979. “Sibling Estimates: The Beginnings of a Survey.” Journal of Political Economy 87:69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geronimous, A.T. and S. Korenman. 1992. “The Socioeconomic Consequences of Teenage Childbearing Reconsidered.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:1187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo, G. 1993. “Use of Sibling Data to Estimate Family Mortality Effects in Guatemala.” Demography 30: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haurin, R.I. and F.L. Mott. 1990. “Adolescent Sexual Activity in the Family Context: The Impact of Older Siblings.” Demography 27:537–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofferth, S.L. and C.D. Hayes. 1987. “Adolescent Pregnancy and Childbearing: An Emerging Research Focus.” Pp. 1–6 in Risking the Future: Adolescent Sexuality, Pregnancy and Childbearing (Vo1. 2), edited by S.L. Hofferth and C.D. Hayes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffman S.D., E.M. Foster, and F.F. Furstenberg. 1993. “Reevaluating the Costs of Teenage Childbearing.” Demography 30:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hogan, D.P. and E.M. Kitagawa. 1985. “The Impact of Social Status, Family Structure, and Neighborhood on the Fertility of Black Adolescents.” American Journal of Sociology 90:825–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lancaster, T. 1985. “Generalized Residuals and Heterogeneous Duration Models With Applications to the Weibull Model.” Journal of Econometrics 28: 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mare, R.D. and A. Palloni. 1988. “Couple Models for Socioeconomic Effects on the Mortality of Older Persons.” Center for Demography and Ecology Working Paper 88-7, Center for Demography and Ecology, The University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  22. Mare, R.D. and C. Winship. 1988. “Endogenous Switching Regression Models for the Causes and Effects of Discrete Variables.” Pp. 132–60 in Common Problems/Proper Solutions: Avoiding Error in Quantitative Research, edited by J.S. Long. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Mayer, S.E. 1991. “How Much Does a High School’s Racial and Socioeconomic Mix Affect Graduation and Teenage Fertility Rates?” Pp. 321–41 in The Urban Underclass, edited by C. Jencks and P.E. Peterson. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  24. McDonald, J. and R. Moffitt. 1980. “The Uses of Tobit Analysis.” Review of Economics and Statistics 62:318–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olsen, R.J. and G. Farkas. 1989. “Endogenous Covariates in Duration Models and the Effect ofAdolescent Child-Birth on Schooling.” Journal of Human Resources 24:39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Powers, D.A. 1993. “Alternative Models of the Effect of Family Structure on Early Family Formation.” Social Science Research 22:283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rhoton, P. 1984. “Attrition and the National Longitudinal Survey of Labor Market Experience: Avoidance, Control, and Correction.” Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  28. Rodgers, J.L. and D.C. Rowe. 1988. “Influence of Siblings on Adolescent Sexual Behavior.” Developmental Psychology 24:722–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Upchurch D.M. and J. McCarthy. 1990. “The Timing of a First Birth and High School Completion.” American Sociological Review 55:224–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Udry, J.R. and J.O. Billy. 1987. “Initiation of Coitus in Early Adolescence.” American Sociological Review, 52:841–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson, W.I. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wu, L.W. and B. Martinson. 1993. “Family Structure and the Risk of a Premarital Birth.” American Sociological Review 58:210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustin
  2. 2.Department of SociologyNational Taiwan UniversityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations