Demography

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 455–466 | Cite as

The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880–1990

A Century of Divorce and Separation-Symposium

Abstract

I use the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series to assess the potential effects of local labor-market conditions on long-term trends and race differences in marital instability. The rise of female labor-force participation and the increase in nonfarm employment are closely associated with the growth of divorce and separation. Moreover, higher female labor-force participation among black women and lower economic opportunities for black men may account for race differences in marital instability before 1940, and for most of such differences in subsequent years. However, unmeasured intervening cultural factors are probably responsible for at least part of these effects.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G.S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cherlin, A.J. 1977. “The Effect of Children on Marital Dissolution.” Demography 14:265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —, 1979. “Work Life and Marital Dissolution.” Pp. 151–66 in Divorce and Separation: Context, Causes, and Consequences, edited by G. Levinger and O.C. Moles. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  4. —, 1992. Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage. Revised and enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cherlin, A.J. and P.B. Walters. 1981. “Trends in United States Men’s and Women’s Sex-Role Attitudes: 1972 to 1978.” American Sociological Review 46:453–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Degler, C.N. 1980. At Odds: Women and the Family in America from the Revolution to the Present. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Durkheim, E. 1960 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Goldin, C. 1990. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Greenstein, T.N. 1990. “Marital Disruption and the Employment of Married Women.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 52:657–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hannon, M.T., N.B. Tuma and L.P. Groeneveld. 1978. “Income and Independence Effects on Marital Dissolution: Results From the Seattle and Denver Income-Maintenance Projects.” American Journal of Sociology 84:611–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hauser, R. 1982. “Occupational Status in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” Historical Methods 15:111–26.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobson, P.H. 1959. American Marriage and Divorce. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
  13. Maddala, G.S. 1977. Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Martin, T.C., and L.L. Bumpass. 1989. “Recent Trends in Marital Disruption.” Demography 26:37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mare, R.D. and C. Winship. 1991. “Socioeconomic Change and the Decline of Marriage for Blacks and Whites.” Pp. 175–202 in The Urban Underclass, edited by C. Jencks and P.E. Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  16. May, E.T. 1980. Great Expectations: Marriage and Divorce in Post- Victorian America. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. McDaniel, A. 1990. “The Power of Culture: A Review of the Idea of Africa’s Influence on Family Structure in Antebellum America.” Journal of Family History 15:225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. —, 1994. “Historical Racial Differences in Living Arrangement of Children.” Journal of Family History 19:57–77Google Scholar
  19. McLanahan, S.S. 1991. “The Two Faces of Divorce: Women’s an Children’s Interests.” Pp. 193–207 in Macro-Micro Linkages in Sociology, edited by J. Huber. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Morgan, S.P., A. McDaniel, A.T. Miller, and S.H. Preston. 1993. “Racial Differences in Household Structure at the Tum of the Century.” American Journal of Sociology 98:798–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moulton, B.R. 1986. “Random Group Effects and the Precision of Regression Estimates.” Journal of Econometrics 32:385–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Norton, A.J. and L.F. Miller. 1992. Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage in the 1990 ’s. Current Population Reports. Series P-23, Special Studies 180. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  23. Oppenheimer, V.K. 1970. The Female Labor Force in the United States: Demographic and Economic Factors Determining its Growth and Changing Composition. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
  24. —, 1994. “Women’s Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial Societies.” Population and Development Review 20:293–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parsons, T. 1949. “The Social Structure of the Family.” Pp. 173–201 in The Family: Its Function and Destiny, edited by R. Anshen. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  26. Preston, S.H. and J. MacDonald. 1979. “The Incidence of Divorce Within Cohorts of American Marriages Contracted Since the Civil War.” Demography 16:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Riley, G. 1991. Divorce: An American Tradition. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Ross, H.L. and LV. Sawhill. 1975. Time of Transition: The Growth of Families Headed by Women. Washington DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Ruggles, S. 1994. “The Origins of African-American Family Structure.” American Sociological Review 59: 136–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruggles, S. and R.R. Menard. 1995. “The Minnesota Historical Census Projects.” Historical Methods 28: 1–78.Google Scholar
  31. Ruggles, S. and M. Sobek. 1995. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: User’s Guide. Minneapolis: Social History Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  32. Sobek, M. 1995. “Occupation and Income Scores.” Historical Methods 28:47–51.Google Scholar
  33. —, 1996. “Work Status and Income: Men in the American Occupational Structure Since the Late Nineteenth Century.” Social Science History 20:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sobek, M. 1997. “Work in America: Gender, Labor Force Participation, and Occupational Attainment, 1880–1990.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  35. Spitze, G. and S.J. South. 1985. “Women’s Employment, Time Expenditure, and Divorce.” Journal of Family Issues 6:307–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thornton, A. 1985. “Changing Attitudes Towards Separation and Divorce: Causes and Consequences.” American Journal of Sociology 90:856–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —, 1989. “Changing Attitudes Toward Family Issues in the United States.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:873–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Treiman, D. 1976. “A Standard Occupational Prestige Scale for Use with Historical Data.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7:283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1910. Instructions to Enumerators: Thirteenth Census of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, W.J. and K. Neckerman. 1987. “Poverty and Family Structure: The Widening Gap between Evidence and Public Policy.” Pp. 63–92 in The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. edited by W.J. Wilson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wright, E. and W. Hunt. 1900. The History and Growth of the United States Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations