Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 135–146 | Cite as

Father by law: Effects of joint legal custody on nonresident fathers’ involvement with children

  • Judith A. SeltzerEmail author
Men’s involvement in parenting in the united states

Abstract

Family membership and household composition do not always coincide. Joint legal custody after divorce formalizes the relationship between fathers and children who live apart. Policymakers hope that explicit acknowledgment of nonresident fathers’ rights and responsibilities will increase their involvement with their children. I use prospective data from the National Survey of Families and Households to examine the association between joint legal custody and two aspects of nonresident fathers’ contributions to their children—the frequency of visits between fathers and children and child-support payments. The analysis examines approximately 160 families in which parents divorced between interviews conducted for Wave 1 (1987–1988) and Wave 2 (1992–1994) of the survey. I investigate the effects of joint legal custody holding constant physical custody or placement by restricting the analysis to children who live with their mothers most of the year. Controlling for socioeconomic status and the quality of family relationships before separation, fathers with joint legal custody see their children more frequently and have more overnight visits than do other fathers. The positive effect of joint legal custody on frequency of visits persists once unobserved differences among families are taken into account. Although fathers with joint legal custody pay more child support than those without joint legal custody, this difference lacks statistical significance when other family characteristics are taken into account. These findings support the view that joint legal custody may encourage some aspects of paternal involvement after divorce.

Keywords

Child Support Nonresident Father Paternal Involvement Joint Custody Marital Happiness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arditti, J.A. 1992. “Differences Between Fathers With Joint Custody and Noncustodial Fathers.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 62:186–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, J., J.H. Block, and P.F. Gjerde. 1988. “Parental Functioning and the Home Environment in Families of Divorce: Prospective and Concurrent Analyses.” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 27:207–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S. 1984. “Changes in Laws Governing Divorce: An Evaluation of Joint Custody Presumptions.” Journal of Family Issues 5:200–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, C.M., E.E. Maccoby, and S.M. Dornbusch. 1991. “Caught Between Parents: Adolescents’ Experience in Divorced Homes.” Child Development 62: 1008–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Case, A. Forthcoming. “The Effects of Stronger Child Support Enforcement on Non-Marital Fertility.” In Fathers Under Fire: The Revolution in Child Support Enforcement, edited by I. Garfinkel, S. McLanahan, D.R. Meyer, and J.A. Seltzer. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Cherlin, A.J., F.F. Furstenberg, Jr., P.L. Chase-Lansdale, K.E. Kiernan, P.K. Robins, D.R. Morrison, and J.O. Teitler. 1991. “Longitudinal Studies of Effects of Divorce on Children in Great Britain and the United States.” Science 252:1386–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, S.C., R.A. Whitney, and J.C. Beck. 1988. “Discrepancies Between Custodial Awards and Custodial Practices: De Jure and De Facto Custody.” Journal of Divorce 11:219–28.Google Scholar
  8. Cummings, E.M. and P. Davies. 1994. Children and Marital Conflict: The Impact of Family Dispute and Resolution. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Emery, R.E. 1988. Marriage, Divorce, and Children’s Adjustment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. — 1994. Renegotiating Family Relationships: Divorce, Child Custody, and Mediation. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Felner, R.D. and L. Terre. 1987. “Child Custody Dispositions and Children’s Adaptation Following Divorce.” Pp. 106–53 Psychology and Child Custody Determinations: Knowledge, Roles and Expertise, edited by L.A. Weithorn. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gottman, J.M. 1994. What Predicts Divorcer: The Relationship Between Marital Processes and Marital Outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Gunnoe, M.L. and S.L. Braver. 1996. “The Effects of Joint Legal Custody on Family Functioning, Controlling for Factors That Predispose a Joint Award.” Unpublished manuscript, Child Trends, Inc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Hanson, T.L. 1996. “Does Parental Conflict Explain Why Divorce is Negatively Associated With Child Welfare?” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Child and Family Studies, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  15. Hetherington, E.M. 1993. “An Overview of the Virginia Longitudinal Study of Divorce and Remarriage with a Focus on Early Adolescence.” Journal of Family Psychology 7:39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hillery, A., II. 1993. “The Case for Joint Custody.” Pp. 29–55 in The Best Parent Is Both Parents: A Guide to Shared Parenting in the 21st Century, edited by D.L. Levy. Norfolk, VA: Hampton Roads.Google Scholar
  17. Isaacs, M.B. 1988. “The Visitation Schedule and Child Adjustment: A Three-Year Study.” Family Process 27:251–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jekielek, S. Forthcoming. “Parental Conflict, Marital Disruption and Children’s Emotional Well-Being.” Social Forces.Google Scholar
  19. Koel, A., S.C. Clark, W.P.C. Phear, and B.B. Hauser. 1988. “A Comparison of Joint and Sole Legal Custody Agreements.” Pp. 73–90 in Impact of Divorce, Single Parenting, and Stepparenting on Children, edited by E.M. Hetherington and J.D. Arasteh. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,Google Scholar
  20. Koch, M.A.P. and C. Lowery. 1984. “Visitation and the Noncustodial Father.” Journal of Divorce 8:47–65.Google Scholar
  21. Kurdek, L.A. 1988. “A 1-Year Follow-up Study of Children’s Adjustment to Divorce, Custodial Mother’s Divorce Adjustment and Postdivorce Parenting.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 9:315–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lowery, C.R. 1986. “Maternal and Joint Custody: Differences in the Decision Process.” Law and Human Behavior 10:303–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maccoby, E.E. and R.H. Mnookin. 1992. Dividing the Child: Social and Legal Dilemmas of Custody. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. McCahey, J.P., M. Kaufman, C. Kraut, and J. Zett. 1994. Child Custody and Visitation Law and Practice, Release 20. New York: Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
  25. Mnookin, R.H., E.E. Maccoby, C.R. Albiston, and C. Depner. 1990. “Private Ordering Revisited: What Custodial Arrangements Are Parents Negotiating?” Pp. 37–74 in Divorce Reform at the Crossroads, edited by S.D. Sugarman and H.H. Kay. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nord, C.W. and N. Zill. 1996. Non-Custodial Parents’ Participation in Their Children’s Lives: Evidence From the Survey of In come and Program Participation, Vol. I. Final report prepared for the Office of Human Services Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  27. Pearson, J.P. and N. Thoennes. 1988. “Supporting Children After Divorce: The Influence of Custody on Support Levels and Payments.” Family Law Quarterly 22:319–39.Google Scholar
  28. Schaeffer, N.C., J.A. Seltzer, and M. Klawitter. 1991. “Estimating Nonresponse and Response Bias: Resident and Nonresident Parents’ Reports About Child Support.” Sociological Methods and Research 20:30–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seltzer, J.A. 1990. “Legal, and Physical Custody Arrangements in Recent Divorces.” Social Science Quarterly 71:250–66.Google Scholar
  30. — 1991a. “Legal Custody Arrangements and Children’s Economic Welfare.” American Journal of Sociology 96:895–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. — 1991b. “Relationships Between Fathers and Children Who Live Apart: The Father’s Role After Separation.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stephens, L.S. 1996. “Will Johnny See Daddy this Week? An Empirical Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives of Postdivorce Contact.” Journal of Family Issues 17:466–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sweet, J.A. and L.L. Bumpass. 1996. The National Survey of Families and Households — Waves 1 and 2: Data Description and Documentation. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison (http//ssc.wisc.edu/nsth/home.htm).Google Scholar
  34. Sweet, J.A., L.L. Bumpass, and V. Call. 1988. “The Design and Content of the National Survey of Families and Households.” National Survey of Families and Households Working Paper No. 1. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  35. Tuschen, K.L. 1994. “When Parents ‘Live’ With Their Children.” Unpublished senior honors thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  36. U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1991. Child Support and Alimony: 1989. Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 173. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. Wallerstein, J.S. and S. Blakeslee. 1989. Second Chances: Men, Women, and Children a Decade After Divorce. New York: Ticknor & Fields.Google Scholar
  38. Wallerstein, J.S. and J.B. Kelly. 1980. “Effects of Divorce on the Visiting Father-Child Relationship.” American Journal of Psychiatry 137:1534–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations