Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 259–278 | Cite as

Beyond single mothers: Cohabitation and marriage in the AFDC program

  • Robert A. MoffittEmail author
  • Robert Reville
  • Anne E. Winkler
Living Arrangements, Families, and Fertility in the United States and Europe

Abstract

We investigate the extent and implications of cohabitation and marriage among U.S. welfare recipients. An analysis of four data sets (the Current Population Survey, the National Survey of Families and Households, the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, and the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth) shows significant numbers of cohabitors among recipients of AFDC. An even more surprising finding is the large number of married women on welfare. We also report the results of a telephone survey of state AFDC agencies conducted to determine state rules governing cohabitation and marriage. The survey results indicate that, in a number of respects, AFDC rules encourage cohabitation. Finally, we conduct an analysis of the impact of AFDC rules on cohabitation, marriage, and single motherhood and find weak evidence in support of incentives to cohabit.

Keywords

Single Mother Current Population Survey Food Stamp Marriage Rate Welfare Recipient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, N., A. Blanc, and D. Bloom. 1988. “Commitment and the Modern Union: Assessing the Link Between Premarital Cohabitation and Subsequent Marital Stability.” American Sociological Review 53: 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, J. 1980. “Jobs, Cash Transfers and Marital Instability.” Journal of Human Resources 15:301–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bumpass, L., R.K. Raley, and J. Sweet. 1995. “The Changing Character of Stepfamilies: Implications of Cohabitation and Nonmarital Childbearing.” Demography 32:425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bumpass, L. and J. Sweet. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.” Demography 26:615–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bumpass, L., J. Sweet, and A. Cherlin. 1991. “The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:913–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cain, G. and D. Wissoker. 1990. “A Reanalysis of Marital Stability in the Seattle-Denver Income-Maintenance Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 95:1235–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherlin, A. 1992. Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Danziger, S., G. Jakubson, S. Schwartz, and E. Smolensky. 1982. “Work and Welfare as Determinants of Female Poverty and Household Headship.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 77:519–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edin, K. 1991. “Surviving the Welfare System: How AFDC Recipients Make Ends Meet.” Social Problems 38:462–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellwood, D. and M.J. Bane. 1985. “The Impact of AFDC on Family Structure and Living Arrangements.” Pp. 137–207 in Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 7, edited by R. Ehrenberg. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gabe, T. 1992. “Demographic Trends Affecting AFDC Caseload Growth.” CRS Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  12. Hannan, M. and N. Tuma. 1990. “A Reassessment of the Effect of Income Maintenance on Marital Dissolution in the Seattle-Denver Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 95: 1270–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilton, L. and J. Shelton. 1996. “The Impact of AFDC on Living Arrangements.” Mimeographed document, Department of Economics, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffman, S. and G. Duncan. 1988. “Multinomial and Conditional Logit Discrete-Choice Models in Demography.” Demography 25:415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutchens, R., G. Jakubson, and S. Schwartz. 1989. “AFDC and the Formation of Subfamilies.” Journal of Human Resources 24:599–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landale, N. and R. Forste. 1991. “Patterns of Entry Into Cohabitation and Marriage Among Mainland Puerto Rican Women.” Demography 28:587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lichter, D., F. LeClere, and D. McLaughlin. 1991. “Local Marriage Markets and the Marital Behavior of Black and White Women.” American Journal of Sociology 96:843–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lichter, D., D. McLaughlin, G. Kephart, and D. Landry. 1992. “Race and the Retreat From Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?” American Sociological Review 57:781–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lillard, L., Moo Brien, and L. Waite. 1995. “Premarital Cohabitation and Subsequent Marital Dissolution: Is it Self-Selection?” Demography 32:437–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. London, R. 1996. “Single Mothers’ Living Arrangements: The Effect of Household Composition on AFDC Participation.” Mimeographed document, Department of Economics, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  21. McLanahan, S. and L. Casper. 1995. “Growing Diversity and Inequality in the American Family.” Pp. 1–46 in State of the Union: America in the 1990s, edited by R. Farley. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Mare, R. and C. Winship. 1991. “Socioeconomic Change and the Decline of Marriage for Blacks and Whites.” Pp. 175–202 in The Urban Underclass, edited by C. Jencks and P. Peterson. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  23. Minarik, J. and R. Goldfarb. 1976. “AFDC Income, Recipient Rates, and Family Dissolution: A Comment.” Journal of Human Resources 11:243–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moffitt, R. 1990. “The Effect of the U.S. Welfare System on Marital Status.” Journal of Public Economics 41: 101–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. — 1992. “Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System.” Journal of Economic Literature 30:1–61.Google Scholar
  26. Moffitt, R., R. Reville, and A. Winkler. 1995. “State AFDC Rules Regarding the Treatment of Cohabitors: 1993.” Social Security Bulletin 57:26–33.Google Scholar
  27. Raley, R.K. 1994. “An Exploration of Economic and Cultural Explanations for Black-White Differences in Union Formation.” Paper Presented at annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Miami.Google Scholar
  28. Raley, R.K. 1995. “Why Cohabit? Why Marry? Some Determinants of First Union Type.” Paper Presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  29. Schram, S. and M. Wiseman. 1988, “Should Families Be Protected From AFDC-UP?” Discussion Paper, #860-88, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  30. Schultz, T.P. 1994. “Marital Status and Fertility in the United States.” Journal of Human Resources 29:637–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sweet, J., L. Bumpass, and V. Call. 1988. “The Design and Content of the National Survey of Families and Households.” NSFH Working Paper No.1., Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  32. Teachman, J. and K. Polonko. 1990. “Cohabitation and Marital Stability in the United States.” Social Forces 69:207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thornton, A. 1988. “Cohabitation and Marriage in the 1980s.” Demography 25:497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thornton, A., W. Axinn, and D. Hill. 1992. “Reciprocal Effects of Religiosity, Cohabitation, and Marriage.” American Journal of Sociology 98:628–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means. 1988. Background Material and Data on Programs Within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  36. — 1994. Background Material and Data on Programs Within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. Willis, R. and J. Haaga. 1996. “Economic Approaches to Understanding Nonmarital Fertility.” Pp. 67–86 in Fertility in the United States, edited by J. Casterline, R. Lee, and K. Foote. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  38. Winkler, A.E. 1994. “The Determinants of a Mother’s Choice of Family Structure: Labor Market Conditions, AFDC Policy, or Community Mores?” Population Research and Policy Review 13:283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. — 1995. “Does AFDC-UP Encourage Two-Parent Families?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14:4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Moffitt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Reville
    • 2
  • Anne E. Winkler
    • 3
  1. 1.Economics DepartmentJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore
  2. 2.RANDSanta MonicaUSA
  3. 3.Economics DepartmentUniversity of Missouri-St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations