Demography

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 83–96

A dynamic analysis of turnover in employment and child care

Mothers and Children

Abstract

The causes of turnover in child-care arrangements and maternal employment are analyzed using panel data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, supplemented with state-level information on child-care markets. The results indicate that turnover in child care is quite high and that child and family characteristics help explain turnover. Important factors include the mother’s wage, the cost of child care, age of the child, and previous child-care decisions. The reduced-form nature of the analysis makes it difficult to determine whether these factors are important because they are associated with unstable child-care supply or because they affect family decisions, conditional on supply factors. The results provide no direct evidence that child-care turnover is higher in states with more unstable child-care markets.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Averett, S., H.E. Peters, and D. Waldman. 1997. “Tax Credits, Labor Supply, and Child Care.” Review of Economics and Statistics 79(2):125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blau, D.M. 1992. “The Child Care Labor Market.” Journal of Human Resources 27:9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. 1993. “The Supply of Child Care Labor.” Journal of Labor Economics 11:324–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, D.M. and A.P. Hagy. 1998. “The Demand for Quality in Child Care.” Journal of Political Economy 106:104–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, D.M. and P. Robins. 1988. “Child Care Costs and Family Labor Supply.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 70:374–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. —. 1989. “Fertility, Employment and Child Care Costs.” Demography 26:287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. —. 1991a. “Child Care Demand and Labor Supply of Young Mothers over Time.” Demography 28:333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. —. 1991b. “Turnover in Child Care Arrangements.” Review of Economics and Statistics 73:152–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connelly, R. 1992. “The Effect of Child Care Costs on Married Women’s Labor Force Participation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74:83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ermisch, J.F. 1989. “Purchased Child Care, Optimal Family Size, and Mother’s Employment.” Journal of Population Economics 2:79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraker, T., R. Moffitt, and D. Wolf. 1985. “Effective Tax Rates and Guarantees in the AFDC Program, 1967-1982.” Journal of Human Resources 20:251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geronimus, A. and S. Korenman. 1992. “The Socioeconomic Consequences of Teen Childbearing Reconsidered.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:1187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, C.D., J.L. Palmer, and M.J. Zaslow (Eds.). 1990. Who Cares for America’s Children? Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Heckman, J.J. 1981. “The incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating a Discrete Time-Discrete Data Stochastic Process.” Pp. 179–96 in Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, edited by C. Manski and D. McFadden. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Heckman, J.J. and B. Singer. 1984. “A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data.” Econometrica 58:1411–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofferth, S.L., A. Brayfield, S. Deich, and P. Holcomb. 1991. National Child Care Survey, 1990. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Hofferth, S.L. and D.A. Wissoker. 1992. “Price, Quality, and Income in Child Care Choice.” Journal of Human Resources 27:70–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hotz, v.J, and M.R. Kilburn. 1991. “The Demand for Child Care and Child Care Costs: Should We Ignore Families With Non-Working Mothers?” NORC Working Paper #91-11, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  19. Hotz, v.J, and M.R. Kilburn. 1994. “Regulating Child Care: The Effects of State Regulations on Child Care Demand and Its Cost.” Working Paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Kimmel, J. Forthcoming. “Child Care and the Employment Behavior of Single and Married Mothers.” Review of Economics and Statistics.Google Scholar
  21. Michalopoulos, C., P.K. Robins, and I. Garfinkel. 1992. “A Structural Model of Labor Supply and Child Care Demand.” Journal of Human Resources 27:166–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Association for the Education of Young Children. 1985. In Whose Hands? A Demographic Fact Sheet on Child Care Providers. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, D. and M. Whitebook. 1986. “Who are Child Care Workers? The Search for Answers.” Young Children Vol. 41:14–20.Google Scholar
  24. Ribar, D.C. 1992. “Child Care and the Labor Supply of Married Women: Structural Evidence.” Journal of Human Resources 27:166–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ribar, D.C. 1994. “The Socioeconomic Consequences of Young Women’s Childbearing: Reconciling Disparate Estimates.” Working Paper No. 4-94-1, Department of Economics, Penn State University.Google Scholar
  26. —. 1995. “A Structural Model of Child Care and the Labor Supply of Married Women.” Journal of Labor Economics 13:558–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Whitebook, M., D. Phillips, and C. Howes. 1989. Who Cares? Child Care Teachers and the Quality of Care in America. Final Report of the National Child Care Staffing Study. Oakland, CA: Child Care Employee Project.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Gardner HallUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations