Advertisement

Brittonia

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Plant collecting along the lower Orinoco, Venezuela: H. H. Rusby and R. W. Squires (1896)

  • Laurence J. Dorr
Articles

Abstract

The plant collecting trip by H. H. Rusby and R. W. Squires in early 1896 to the lower Río Orinoco, Venezuela, was sponsored by The Orinoco Company Limited, which was promoted by many residents of Faribault, Rice Co., Minnesota, U.S.A. In February 1896, the company formed an exploring party in order to map a large concession of approximately 10,000,000 acres that they had received from the Venezuelan government and to prospect the mineral deposits, study the vegetation, and ascertain the conditions affecting colonization of the concession. The botanical work was entrusted to Rusby, who with the assistance of Squires and an unnamed laborer from Trinidad, collected almost 500 numbers of vascular plants in sets as large as thirty-two. Rusby indicated that he spent only 51 days in the field and lost a week of that time to an accident that befell the explorers. He was less constrained than the Minnesotans (who were promoting development), and he wrote that botanical exploration was hampered also by the inundation of the forests and savannahs with each tide, the lack of trails, and the large numbers of annoying insects and poisonous snakes. An annotated catalog of 43 new taxa of vascular plants based on Rusby and Squires's collection is provided. Lectotypes are designated forTachigalia rusbyi Harms (Fabaceae),Cupania semidentata Radlk. (Sapindaceae), andSolanum sacupanense Rusby (Solanaceae). A gazetteer of the localities cited in Rusby's field book and in publications pertaining to the Orinoco trip is appended.

Key words

Henry Hurd Rusby (1855–1940) Roy White Squires (fl. 1896–1932) Vanezuela Río Orinoco 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. American Geographical Society. 1945. Index to map of Hispanic America 1∶1,000,000. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. 1869. The Orinoco Exploring and Mining Company. State of Guayana, South America. Privately published, [Philadelphia].Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 1895a. The truth concering [sic] Venezuela. Donald Grant punctures some journalastic [sic] wind bags, and gives some inside facts. The Faribault Republican [10 Apr], p. 1, col. 8.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. 1895b. The Venezuelan syndicate. A gigantic project of territorial development, in which Minnesota capitalists are engaged. The Faribault Republican [22 May], p. 2, col. 1.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous. 1895c. Venezuela. The faribault Republican [21 Aug], p. 3, col. 3.Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous. 1895d. “Articles of incorporation of the Orinoco company…” The Faribault Republican [25 Sep], p. 3, col. 1.Google Scholar
  7. Anonymous. 1895e. England, Venezuela and the Monroe Doctrine. The Faribault Republican [30 Oct], p. 2, col. 2.Google Scholar
  8. Anonymous. 1896a. Orinoco Mining Company. The Faribault Republican [12 Feb], p. 3, col. 3.Google Scholar
  9. Anonymous. 1896b. The Orinoco Company. The expedition for Venezuela will start in a few days. The Faribault Republican [19 Feb], p. 3, col. 4.Google Scholar
  10. Anonymous. 1896c. The Venezuela party. The Faribault Republican [26 Feb], p. 3, col. 3.Google Scholar
  11. Anonymous. 1896d. Botanical exploration. Ariel 19(20): 3. [29 Feb]Google Scholar
  12. Anonymous. 1896e. Venezuela explorers. Further concerning the expedition. The Faribault Republican [4 MarXXX], p. 3, col. 4.Google Scholar
  13. Anonymous. 1896f. Venezuela. Return of Dr. Rogers of the Orinoco Company. The Faribault Republican [5 Aug], p. 3, col. 4.Google Scholar
  14. Anonymous. 1897a. “S. A. Thompson…” The Faribault Republican [10 Feb], p. 3, col. 2.Google Scholar
  15. Anonymous. 1897b. Home from Venezuela. The Faribault Republican [11 Aug], p. 3, col. 3.Google Scholar
  16. Anonymous. 1898. From Venezuela. The Faribault Republican [11 May], p. 5, cols. 3, 4.Google Scholar
  17. Anonymous. 1911. John Hinchley Hart. Bull. Misc. Inform. 1911: 162–163.Google Scholar
  18. Austin, D. F. 1973. The American Erycibeae (Convolvulaceae):Maripa, Dicranostyles, andLysiostyles I. Systematics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 60: 306–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Barnhart, J. H. 1965. Biographical notes upon botanists. 3 vols. G. K. Hall, Boston.Google Scholar
  20. [Britten, J.]. 1911. John H. Hart. J. Bot. 11: 176.Google Scholar
  21. Cherrie, G. K. 1916. New birds from the collection of the Collins-Day expedition to South America. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 35: 391–397.Google Scholar
  22. [Clement, H. O.]. 1896. From Venezuela. The Faribault Republican [15 Apr], p. 3, col. 3.Google Scholar
  23. [Dart, L. O.]. 1896. Roger's party in Venezuela. They are welcomed “Americano Good Fellow.” The Faribault Republican [29 Apr], p. 2, col. 5.Google Scholar
  24. Desmond, R. 1977. Dictionary of British and Irish botanists and horticulturists. Taylor & Frances, London.Google Scholar
  25. Dorr, L. J. 1991 [1992]. The vascular plant collections of R. S. Williams from Bolivia and Peru (1901–1902). Brittonia 43: 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. — 1994. The vascular plant collections of R. S. Williams from Bolivia and Peru (1901–1902): Addenda et corrigenda. Brittonia 46: 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Epling, C. 1937. Synopsis of South American Labiatae. 4. Teil. Fedde Rep. Spec. Nov. Biehefte 85: 289–341.Google Scholar
  28. Fries, R. E. 1931. Revision der Arten einiger Anonaceen-Gattungen. II. Acta Horti Berg. 10(2): 129–341.Google Scholar
  29. — 1934. Revision der Arten einiger Anonaceen-Gattungen. III. Acta Horti Berg. 12(1): 1–220.Google Scholar
  30. Gagnepain, F. 1944. Flore générale de l'Indo-Chine. Tome Préliminaire. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
  31. Gilbert, B. D. 1896. A newGymnogramme [sic] from Venezuela, with remarks on some other Venezuelan ferns. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 23: 448–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Greuter, W., Chairman Editorial Committee. 1988. International code of botanical nomenclature. Regnum Veg. 118.Google Scholar
  33. Hambridge, G. 1933. “Bad boy” to scientist. New York Herald Tribune Magazine [5 Feb], sect. XI, pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
  34. Hekking, W. H. A. 1988. Violaceae. Part I—Rinorea andRinoreocarpus. Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 46: 1–208.Google Scholar
  35. Henderson, A. 1990. Arecaceae. Part I. Introduction to the Iriarteinae. Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 53: 1–101.Google Scholar
  36. Holmgren, P. K., D. Johnson, J. A. Kallunki, S. Keller, N. Murray, J. F. Pruski &M. A. Wetter (compilers). 1985. Index to specimens filed in The New York Botanical Garden Vascular Plant Type Herbarium. Meckler Publishing, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  37. Knuth, R. [1926-] 1928. Initiae florae Venezuelensis. Dahlem, Berlin.Google Scholar
  38. Kreuter, G. 1973. Empire on the Orinoco. Minnesota concession in Venezuela. Minnesota Hist. 43(6): 198–212.Google Scholar
  39. LaFeber, W. 1963. The new empire. An interpretation of American expansion 1860–1898. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Leeuwenberg, A. J. M. 1994. A revision ofTabernaemontana Two. The New World species andStemmadenia. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  41. Lipp, F. J. 1974. One of the giants. Henry Hurd Rusby (1855–1940). Garden J. New York Bot. Gard. 24: 70–74.Google Scholar
  42. López-Palacios, S. 1977. Flora de Venezuela. Verbenaceae. Universidad de Los Andes, Consejo de Publicaciónes, Facultad de Farmacia, Mérida, Venezuela.Google Scholar
  43. Maas, P. J. M. 1977.Renealmia (Zingiberaceae-Zingiberoideae). Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 18: 1–161.Google Scholar
  44. — 1982. Zingiberaceae. Pages 205–206.In: T. Lasser, editor. Flora de Venezuela 11(2). Instituto Nacional de Parques, Dirección de Investigaciones Biológicas, Caracas.Google Scholar
  45. —,E. A. Mennega &L. Y. Th. Westra. 1987. Index to neotropical taxa of Annonaceae. Institute of Systematic Botany, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  46. Merrill, E. D. 1938. New or noteworthy Indo-Chinese plants. J. Arnold Arbor. 19(1): 21–70.Google Scholar
  47. Meurer-Grimes, B. 1989. Index to collectors of the Piperaceae represented in the T. G. Yuncker Herbarium of DePauw University. Brittonia 41: 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moldenke, H. N. 1934. A monograph of the genusAegiphila. Brittonia 1: 245–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. — 1942a. Henry Hurd Rusby. Chron. Bot. 7(5): 230–231.Google Scholar
  50. — 1942b. A list showing the location of the principal collections of Verbenaceae and Avicenniacae. Privately published, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Paynter, R. A., Jr. 1982. Ornithological gazetteer of Venezuela. Bird Department, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  52. Pennington, T. D. 1981. Meliaceae. Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 28: 1–470.Google Scholar
  53. Perkens, D. 1955. A history of the Monroe Doctrine. Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  54. Phelps, W. H. 1944 [1945]. Resumen de las colecciones ornitológicas hechas en Venezuela. Bol. Soc. Venez. Ci. Nat. 9(61): 325–444.Google Scholar
  55. Pittier, H. 1920. La evolución de las ciencias naturales y las exploraciones botánicas en Venezuela. Cultura Venezolana, 14(Suppl.): 1–28.Google Scholar
  56. Pittier, H. 1931. El estado actual de nuestros conocimientos acerca de la flora de Venezuela. Caracas, Sociedad Venezolana de Ciencias Naturales (2 Sep 1931): 1–20.Google Scholar
  57. Prance, G. T. 1971. An index of plant collectors in Brazilian Amazonia. Acta Amazonica 1: 25–65.Google Scholar
  58. — 1972. Chrysobalanaceae. Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 9: 1–410.Google Scholar
  59. — 1982. Chrysobalanaceae. Pages 325–487.In: T. Lasser, editor. Flora de Venezuela 4(2). Instituto Nacional de Parques, Dirección de Investigaciones Biológicas, Caracas.Google Scholar
  60. Robinson, B. L. 1898 Diagnoses and notes relating to tropical American Eupatorieae. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 54: 235–263.Google Scholar
  61. [Rogers, A. C.]. 1896. From Venezuela. Extract from private letter by Dr. A. C. Rogers. The Faribault Republican [29 Apr], p. 3, col. 4.Google Scholar
  62. Rossi-Wilcox, S. M. 1993. Henry Hurd Rusby: a biographical sketch and selectively annotated bibliography. Harvard Papers Bot. 4: 1–30.Google Scholar
  63. Rusby, H. H. 1896. Concerning exploration upon the Lower Orinoco. Alum. J. College Pharm. New York 3(8): 185–191.Google Scholar
  64. — 1902. A new timber for railroad ties. Torreya 2: 6–7.Google Scholar
  65. — 1918. Recent botanical collecting in the Republic of Colombia. Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 17: 39–47.Google Scholar
  66. — 1920. Descriptions of three hundred new species of South American plants. Privately published, New York.Google Scholar
  67. — 1933. Jungle memories. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, A. C. 1940. The American species of Hippocrateaceae. Brittonia 3: 341–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stafleu, F. A. & R. S. Cowan. 1983. Taxonomic literature II. Vol. 4: P-Sak. Regnum Veg. 110.Google Scholar
  70. Stafleu, F. A. & R. S. Cowan. 1985. Taxonomic literature II. Vol. 5: Sal-Ste. Regnum Veg. 112.Google Scholar
  71. Steyermark, J. A. 1965. Rubiaceae. Pages 198–211.In: B. Maguire et al. The botany of the Guayana Highland—Part VI. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 12(3): 1–285.Google Scholar
  72. Stieber, M. T. 1982. Register of plant collectors' field notes held in North American institutions. Huntia 4: 151–202.Google Scholar
  73. Swart, J. J. 1942. A monograph of the genusProtium and some allied genera (Burseraceae). Recueil Trav. Bot. Néerl. 39: 212–446.Google Scholar
  74. Texera Arnal, Y. 1991. La exploración botánica en Venezuela (1754–1950). Fondo Editorial Acta Cientifica Venezolana, Caracas.Google Scholar
  75. Trelease, W. &T. G. Yuncker. 1950. The Piperaceae of northern South America. 2 vols. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
  76. U. S. Department of the Interior. 1961. Gazetteer No. 56. Venezuela. Official standard names approyed by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  77. Vegter, I. H. 1983. Index herbariorum. Part II(5). Collectors N-R. Regnum Veg. 109.Google Scholar
  78. Vegter, I. H. 1986. Index herbariorum. Part II(6). Collectors S. Regnum Veg. 114.Google Scholar
  79. Vila, M.-A. 1976. Diccionario de tierras y aguas de Venezuela. Ministerio de Obras Publicas, Direción de Cartografia Nacional, Caracas.Google Scholar
  80. Weeks, W. C. 1897. Engineering in South America. Univ. Minnesota Engineers' Year Book 1897: 8–16.Google Scholar
  81. Weil, T. E. et al. 1971. Area handbook for Venezuela. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  82. Williams, D. E. &S. M. Fraser. 1992. Henry Hurd Rusby: the father of economic botany at The New York Botanical Garden. Brittonia 44: 273–279.Google Scholar
  83. Woodward, C. H. 1941. Henry Hurd Rusby—explorer, professor, reformer, botanist. J. New York Bot. Gard. 42: 43–46.Google Scholar
  84. Zarucchi, J. L. &J. H. Kirkbride, Jr. 1990. A necessary new combination inDuroia (Rubiaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 77: 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurence J. Dorr
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanySmithsonian InstitutionWashington, DCU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations