Advertisement

Brittonia

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 406–424 | Cite as

A cladistic approach to the phylogeny of the “Bryophytes”

  • Brendt D. Mishler
  • Steven P. Churchill
Article

Abstract

The importance of a cladistic approach in reconstructing the phylogeny of bryophytes is discussed and illustrated by an analysis of the major groups of bryophytes with respect to the tracheophytes and the green algae. The cladistic analysis, using 51 characters taken from the literature, gives the following tentative results: (1) the embryophytes as a whole are monophyletic; (2) the bryophytes (sensu lato) are paraphyletic; (3) the mosses share a more recent common ancestor with the tracheophytes than do the liverworts or hornworts; (4) the hornworts appear to share a more recent common ancestor with the moss-tracheophyte lineage than with the liverworts; however, the existence of several homoplasies makes this placement more problematical; (5) the origin of alternation of generations in the embryophytes, based on out-group comparison with their oogamous, haplontic, algal sister groups, was by progressive elaboration of the primitively epiphytic sporophyte generation; and (6) the presence of vascular tissue (xylem and phloem) can best be interpreted as a synapomorphy of the moss-tracheophyte clade, and tracheids (xylem with ornamented walls) as a synapomorphy of the tracheophytes; therefore, the prevailing designation of “vascular plants” for the tracheophytes alone is inaccurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Basile, D. V. & M. R. Basile. 1983. Desuppression of leaf primordia ofPlagiochila arctica (Hepaticae) by ethylene antagonist. Science 220: 1051–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. —. 1984. Probing the evolutionary history of bryophytes experimentally. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 55: 173–185.Google Scholar
  3. Bold, H. C., C. J. Alexopoulos & T. Delevoryas. 1980. Morphology of plants and fungi. Ed. 4. Harper & Row. New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bower, F. O. 1908. The origin of a land flora. Macmillan & Co., London.Google Scholar
  5. — 1935. Primitive land plants. Macmillan & Co., London.Google Scholar
  6. Bremer, B. 1981. A taxonomic revision ofSchistidium (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) 3. Lindbergia 7: 73–90.Google Scholar
  7. Bremer, K. & H.-E. Wanntorp. 1978. Phylogenetic systematics in botany. Taxon 27: 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. — &-—. 1981a. The cladistic approach to plant classification. Pages 87–94.In: V. A. Funk & D. R. Brooks, editors. Advances in cladistics, Vol. 1. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  9. — &-—. 1981b. A cladistic classification of green plants. Nord. J. Bot. 1: 1–3.Google Scholar
  10. Buck, W. R. 1980. A generic revision of the Entodontaceae. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 48: 71–159.Google Scholar
  11. Churchill, S. P. 1981. A phylogenetic analysis, classification and synopsis of the genera of the Grimmiaceae (Musci). Pages 127–144.In: V. A. Funk & D. R. Brooks, editors. Advances in cladistics, Vol. 1, New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  12. —, E. O. Wiley & L. Hauser. 1984. A critique of Wagner groundplan-divergent studies and a comparison with other methods of phylogenetic analysis. Taxon 33: 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, G. C. S. & J. G. Duckett, editors. 1979. Bryophyte systematics. Systematics Association Special Volume no. 14. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  14. Crandall-Stotler, B. 1980. Morphogenetic designs and a theory of bryophyte origins and divergence. BioScience 30: 580–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crosby, M. R. 1980. The diversity and relationships of mosses. Pages 115–129.In: R. J. Taylor & A. E. Leviton, editors. The mosses of North America. Pacific Division, AAAS, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  16. Crum, H. 1976. Mosses of the Great Lakes Forest. Univ. of Michigan Herbarium, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  17. — & L. E. Anderson. 1981. Mosses of Eastern North America. 2 vols. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Donoghue, M. J. 1983. The phylogenetic relationships ofViburnum. Pages 143–166.In: N. I. Platnick & V. A. Funk, editors. Advances in cladistics, Vol. 2. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Duckett, J. D., Z. B. Carothers & C. C. J. Miller. 1982. Comparative spermatology and bryophyte phylogeny. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 53: 107–125.Google Scholar
  20. Farris, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Pages 7–36.In: N. I. Platnick & V. A. Funk, editors. Advances in cladistics, Vol. 2. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Frederick, S. E., P. J. Gruber & N. E. Tolbert. 1973. The occurrence of glycolate dehydrogenase and glycolate oxidase in green plants: an evolutionary survey. Pl. Physiol. 52: 318–323.Google Scholar
  22. Funk, V. A. & W. H. Wagner, Jr. 1982. A bibliography of botanical cladistics: 1. 1981. Brittonia 34: 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geissler, P. & S. W. Greene, editors. 1982. Bryophyte taxonomy. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 71: 1–558.Google Scholar
  24. Gorham, J. 1977. Lunularic acid and related compounds in liverworts, algae andHydrangea. Phytochemistry 16: 249–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, L. E. 1982. The occurrence, evolution, and phylogenetic significance of parenchyma inColeochaete Breb. Amer. J. Bot. 69: 447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. — 1983.Coleochaete: advanced green alga or primitive embryophyte? (Abstract) Amer. J. Bot. 70 (5, Part 2): 5.Google Scholar
  27. — 1984.Coleochaete and the origin of land plants. Amer. J. Bot. 71: 603–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. — & G. E. McBride. 1979. The occurrence and phylogenetic significance of a multilayered structure inColeochaete spermatozoids. Amer. J. Bot. 66: 887–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. — & L. W. Wilcox. 1983. The occurrence and phylogenetic significance of putative placental transfer cells in the green algaColeochaete. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hébant, C. 1977. The conducting tissues of bryophytes. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca. Vol. 10. J. Cramer, Vaduz.Google Scholar
  31. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  32. Jeffrey, C. 1962. The origin and differentiation of the archegoniate land-plants. Bot. Not. 115: 446–454.Google Scholar
  33. Koponen, T. 1968. Generic revision of Mniaceae Mitt. (Bryophyta). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5: 117–151.Google Scholar
  34. — 1973.Rhizomnium (Mniaceae) in North America. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 10: 1–26.Google Scholar
  35. — 1982. Generic and family concepts in the Mniaceae. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 71: 249–259.Google Scholar
  36. Lovejoy, A. O. 1936. The great chain of being. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  37. Lugardon, B. 1978. Comparison between pollen and pteridophyte spore walls. IV Int. Palynol. Conf. Lucknow (1976–77) 1: 199–206.Google Scholar
  38. Maddison, W. P., M. J. Donoghue & D. R. Maddison. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33: 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markham, K. R. & L. J. Porter. 1978. Chemical constituents of the bryophytes. Progr. in Phytochem. 5: 181–272.Google Scholar
  40. Melkonian, M. 1982. Structural and evolutionary aspects of the flagellar apparatus in green algae and land plants. Taxon 31: 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, H. A. 1982. Bryophyte evoluton and geography. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 18: 145–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mishler, B. D. & S. P. Churchill. 1983. On the application of Hennigian cladistics to the phylogeny of the bryophytes. (Abstract) Amer. J. Bot. 70 (5, Part 2): 6.Google Scholar
  43. Mueller, D. M. J. 1974. Spore wall formation and chloroplast development during sporogenesis in the mossFissidens limbatus. Amer. J. Bot. 61: 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neidhart, H. V. 1979. Comparative studies of sporogenesis in bryophytes. Pages 251–280.In: G. C. S. Clarke & J. G. Duckett, editors. Bryophyte systematics, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  45. Nishida, Y. 1978. Studies on the sporeling types in mosses. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 44: 371–454.Google Scholar
  46. Paolillo, D. J. 1981. The swimming sperms of land plants. Bio Science 31: 367–373.Google Scholar
  47. Parenti, L. R. 1980. A phylogenetic analysis of the land plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 13: 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. — 1982. Cladistics and conventions. Taxon 31: 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Patterson, C. 1981. Significance of fossils in determining evolutionary relationships. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. — 1982. Morphological characters and homology. Pages 21–74.In: K. A. Joysey & A. E. Friday, editors. Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Pickett-Heaps, J. D. 1976. Cell division in eukaryotic algae. BioScience 26: 445–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. — 1979. Electron microscopy and the phylogeny of green algae and land plants. Amer. Zool. 19: 545–554.Google Scholar
  53. — 1982. New light on the green algae. Carolina Biology Reader 115. Carolina Biological Supply Company. Burlington, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  54. Proskauer, J. 1960. Studies on Anthocerotales VI. Phytomorphology 10: 1–19.Google Scholar
  55. Renzaglia, K. S. 1978. A comparative morphology and developmental anatomy of the Anthocerophyta. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 44: 31–90.Google Scholar
  56. Richardson, P. M. & D. A. Young. 1982. The phylogenetic content of flavonoid point scores. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 10: 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scagel, R. T., R. J. Bandoni, J. R. Maze, C. E. Rouse, W. B. Schofield & J. R. Stein. 1982. Nonvascular plants: an evolutionary survey. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.Google Scholar
  58. Scheirer, D. C. 1980. Differentiation of bryophyte conducting tissues: structure and histo-chemistry. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 107: 298–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schuster, R. M. 1966. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America. Vol. 1. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  60. — 1979. The phylogeny of the Hepaticae. Pages 41–82.In: G. C. S. Clarke & J. G. Duckett, editors. Bryophyte systematics. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, G. L. 1971. A conspectus of the genera of Polytrichaceae. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 21: 1–83.Google Scholar
  62. Smoot, E. L., R. K. Jansen & T. N. Taylor. 1981. A phylogenetic analysis of the land plants: a botanical commentary. Taxon 30: 65–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stevens, P. F. 1980. Evolutionary polarity of character states. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stevens, P. F. In press. Homology and phylogeny: morphology and systematics. Syst. Bot.Google Scholar
  65. Stewart, K. D. & K. R. Mattox. 1975. Comparative cytology, evolution and classification of the green algae with some consideration of the origin of other organisms with chlorophylls a and b. Bot. Rev. 41: 104–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Suire, C. & Y. Asakawa. 1979. Chemotaxonomy of bryophytes: a survey. Pages 447–477.In: G. C. S. Clarke & J. G. Duckett, editors. Bryophyte systematics. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  67. Swain, T. & G. Cooper-Driver. 1981. Biochemical evolution in early land plants. Pages 103–134.In: K. Niklas, editor. Paleobotany, paleoecology, and evolution, Vol. 1, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Taylor, T. N. 1982. The origin of land plants: a paleobotanical perspective. Taxon 31: 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vitt, D. H. 1971. The infrageneric evolution, phylogeny, and taxonomy of the genusOrthotrichum (Musci) in North America. Nova Hedwigia 21: 683–711.Google Scholar
  70. — 1983. The New Zealand species of the pantropical genusMacromitrium (Orthotrichaceae: Musci): taxonomy, phylogeny and phytogeography. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 54: 1–94.Google Scholar
  71. Wagner, W. H., Jr. 1980. Origin and philosophy of the ground plan-divergence method of cladistics. Syst. Bot. 5: 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Watson, E. V. 1971. The structure and life of bryophytes. Ed. 3. Hutchinson & Co., London.Google Scholar
  73. Wiley, E. O. 1980. Phylogenetic systematics and vicariance biogeography. Syst. Bot. 5: 194–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. — 1981. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. J. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  75. Young, D. A. & P. M. Richardson. 1982. A phylogenetic analysis of extant seed plants: the need to utilize homologous characters. Taxon 31: 250–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zimmermann, W. 1932. Phylogenie. Pages 433–464.In: F. Verdoorn, editor. Manual of bryology. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© the New York Botanical Garden 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brendt D. Mishler
    • 1
  • Steven P. Churchill
    • 2
  1. 1.Farlow HerbarjumHarvard UniversityCambridge
  2. 2.New York Botanical GardenBronx

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options