Brittonia

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 31–43 | Cite as

A biosystematic and evolutionary study of capsicum baccatum (Solanaceae)

  • W. Hardy Eshbaugh
Article

Abstract

Capsicum baccatum L. has frequently been treated as two distinct species,C. microcarpum Cav. andC. pendulum Willd. A biosystematic study reveals a quantitative and qualitative basis for morphological separation ofC. baccatum into two taxa, while cytological and genetic data indicate their close similarity. A resolution of this apparent contradiction can be found in a “gigas” effect imparted to all the organ systems of cultivatedC. baccatum while the fruit has been under intense subconscious and conscious artificial selective pressures for an increase in size. Few, if any, incipient genetic barriers have arisen to separateC. baccatum into distinct species. CultivatedC. baccatum has been isolated by man in a number of localities outside the range of wildC. baccatum. Where both cultivated and wildC. baccatum occur sympatrically, they are effectively isolated by an inbreeding mechanism and agricultural practices. On the basis of this investigationC. baccatum is treated as a wild variety,C. baccatum L. var.baccatum, and a cultivated variety,C. baccatum var.pendulum (Willd.) Eshbaugh.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, E. 1952. Plants, Man and Life. Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown & Co. 245 pp.Google Scholar
  2. — 1960. The evolution of domestication.2: 67–84.In: Tax, S. (Editor) Evolution after Darwin: the University of Chicago Centennial. 3 vols. Vol. 2. The Evolution of Man. Chicago, Illinois: Univ. Chicago Press. v + 473 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Emboden, W. A. 1961. A preliminary study of the crossing relationships ofCapsicum baccatum. Butler Univ. Bot. Studies14: 1–5.Google Scholar
  4. Eshbaugh, W. H. 1964. A numerical taxonomic and cytogenetic study of certain species of the genusCapsicum. Thesis: Ph.D. Indiana Univ., Bloomington. pp. 112.Google Scholar
  5. — 1968. A nomenclatural note on the genusCapsicum. Taxon17: 51–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hauser, E. J. P. &J. H. Morrison 1964. The cytochemical reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium as an index of pollen viability. Amer. Jour. Bot.51: 748–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heiser, C. B., Jr. 1964. Los chiles y ajiés (Capsicum) de Costa Rica y Ecuador. Ciencia y Naturaleza (Ecuador)7(2): 50–57.Google Scholar
  8. — 1969. Systematics and the origin of cultivated plants. Taxon18: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. — 1969. Names for the cultivatedCapsicum species (Solanaceae). Taxon18: 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. — &P. G. Smith 1953. The cultivatedCapsicum peppers. Econ. Bot.7: 214–227.Google Scholar
  11. Hunziker, A. T. 1950. Estudios sobre Solanaceae. I. Sinopsis de las especies silvestres deCapsicum de Argentina y Paraguay. Darwiniana (Buenos Aires)9: 225–247.Google Scholar
  12. — 1958. Synopsis of the genusCapsicum. VIII Congress Internat. Bot. (Paris) Rapp. & Comm. Sect.4(3): 73–74.Google Scholar
  13. — 1961. Noticia sobre el cultivo deCapsicum baccatum L. (Solanaceae) en Argentina. Kurtziana (Cordoba)1: 303.Google Scholar
  14. Hyde, B. B. &Catherine A. Gardella 1953. A mordanting fixation for intense staining of small chromosomes. Stain Tech.28: 305–308.Google Scholar
  15. Jenkins, J. A. 1948. The origin of the cultivated tomato. Econ. Bot.2: 379–392.Google Scholar
  16. Mangelsdorf, P. C., R. S. MacNeish, &W. C. Galinat 1964. Domestication of corn. Science143: 538–545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohta, Y. 1962. Karyotype analysis ofCapsicum species. Seiken ZihÔ13: 93–99.Google Scholar
  18. Pickersgill, Barbara 1969. The archeological record of chili peppers (Capsicum spp.) and the sequence of plant domestication in Peru. Amer. Antiquity34: 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. PPurseglove, J. W. 1965. The spread of tropical crops. pp. 375–386.In: Baker, H. G. & G. L. Stebbins, Jr. (Editors) The Genetics of Colonizing Species. New York & London: Academic Press. xv + 588 pp.Google Scholar
  20. — 1968. Tropical Crops. Dicotyledons 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. vii + 719 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Schwanitz, F. 1959. Selection and race formation in cultivated plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quantitative Biol.24: 107–114.Google Scholar
  22. — 1966. The Origin of Cultivated Plants. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Univ. Press. vi + 175 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, P. G. &C. B. Heiser, Jr. 1957a. Taxonomy ofCapsicum sinense Jacq. and the geographic distribution of the cultivatedCapsicum species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club84: 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. — 1957b. Breeding behavior of cultivated peppers. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.70: 286–290.Google Scholar
  25. —,C. M. Rick, &C. B. Heiser, Jr. 1951.Capsicum pendulum Willd., another cultivated pepper from South America. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.57: 339–342.Google Scholar
  26. Sokal, R. R. &C. D. Michener 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.38(2): 1409–1438.Google Scholar
  27. — &P. H. A. Sneath 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco, California: W. H. Freeman. xvi + 359 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Terpo, A. 1966. Kritische Revision der wildwachsenden Arten und der kultivierten Sorten der GattungCapsicum L. Repert. Sp. Nov.72: 155–191.Google Scholar
  29. Towle, Margaret A. 1961. The ethnobotany of pre-Columbian Peru. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, Inc. v + 180 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Hardy Eshbaugh
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of BotanyMiami UniversityOxfordOhio

Personalised recommendations