Advertisement

Brittonia

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 334–355 | Cite as

Fossil forms of Amentiferae

  • Jack A. Wolfe
Article

Abstract

Review of the procedures used in determining fossil plant organs indicates that the many Cretaceous records of extant genera of “Amentiferae” based on leaves should be rejected as theoretically unreliable. Palynological data, in combination with some valid megafossil data, indicate that most recognizable members of “Amentiferae” are no older than the later part of the Late Cretaceous. Juglandales appear to be derivatives of the ancient Normapolles complex and unrelated to other “Amentiferae.” A preliminary account of some of the comparative foliar morphology of extant “Amentiferae” indicates that some—particularly Betulaceae and Fagaceae—are closely related to Hamamelidales but that other families—notably Rhoipteleaceae, Juglandaceae, Didymelaceae, and Leitneriaceae—are unrelated to this order.

Keywords

Pollen Type Secondary Vein Extant Genus Venation Pattern Atlantic Coastal Plain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Axelrod, D. I. 1952. A theory of angiosperm evolution. Evolution6: 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. — 1970. Mesozoic paleogeography and early angiosperm history. Bot. Rev.36: 277–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, I. W. &C. G. Nast 1945. Morphology and relationships of Trochodendron and Tetracentron, I. Stem, root, and leaf. J. Arnold Arbor.26: 143–154.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, W. A. 1957. Flora of the Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Mem. Geol. Surv. Canada293, 84 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, E. W. 1916. The lower Eocene floras of southeastern North America. Profess. Pap. U.S. Geol. Surv.91. 481 pp.Google Scholar
  6. - 1925. The flora of the Ripley formation. Profess. Pap. U. S. Geol. Surv.136. 94 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, R. W. 1933. A Cretaceous sweet gum. Bot. Gaz.94: 611–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. — 1939. Fossil leaves, fruits, and seeds ofCercidiphyllum. J. Paleontol.13: 485–499.Google Scholar
  9. -— 1946. Walnuts from the late Tertiary of Ecuador. Amer. J. Sci.244: 554–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. — 1960. Corkwood in the Eocene flora of the southeastern United States. J. Paleontol.34: 429–432.Google Scholar
  11. - 1962. Paleocene flora of the Rocky Mountains and Great Plains. Profess. Pap. U.S. Geol. Surv.375. 119 pp., 69 plates.Google Scholar
  12. Chandler, M. E. J. 1961. The lower Tertiary floras of southern England, I. London: British Museum (Natural History). 354 pp., 34 plates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. — 1964. The lower Tertiary floras of southern England, IV. London: British Museum (Natural History). 151 pp., 4 plates.Google Scholar
  14. Couper, R. A. 1960. New Zealand Mesozoic and Cainozoic plant microfossils. Paleontol. Bull. New Zealand Geol. Surv.32. 87 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Cronquist, Arthur 1968. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 396 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Dorofeyev, P. I. 1963. Tretichnyye Flory Zapodnoy Sibiri [Tertiary Floras of Western Siberia]. Moscow & Leningrad: Akad. Nauk SSSR. 346 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Doyle, J. A. 1969. Cretaceous angiosperm pollen of the Atlantic Coastal Plain and its evolutionary significance. J. Arnold Arbor.50: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Endress, P. K. 1967. Systematisch Studie über die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Hamamelidaceen und Betulaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.87: 431–525.Google Scholar
  19. Erdtman, Gunnar 1943. An Introduction to Pollen Analysis. Waltham: Chronica Botanica Co., 239 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Evernden, J. F. &G. T. James 1964. Potassium-argon dates and the Tertiary floras of North America. Amer. J. Sci.262: 945–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fontaine, W. M. 1889. The Potomac or younger Mesozoic flora. Monogr. U.S. Geol. Surv.15. 377 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Góczán, F., J. J. Groot, W. Krutzsch &B. Pacltova 1967. Die Gattungen des “Stemma Normapolles Pflug 1953b” (Angiospermae). PalÄontol. Abh., Abh. B, PalÄobot.2: 429–539 + 19 plates.Google Scholar
  23. Hickey, L. J. 1971. Evolutionary significance of leaf architectural features in the woody dicots [abstract]. Amer. J. Bot.58: 469.Google Scholar
  24. — 1973. Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Amer. J. Bot.60: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. - In press. The stratigraphy and paleobotany of the Golden Valley Formation. Mem. Geol. Soc. Amer.Google Scholar
  26. Huzioka, Kazuo 1961. A new Palaeogene species of the genusEucommia from Hokkaido, Japan. Trans. & Proc. Palaeontol. Soc. Japo. n.s.10: 9–12.Google Scholar
  27. Klucking, E. P. 1959. The fossil Betulaceae of western North America. Thesis: M.A., University of California, Berkeley. 166 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Koch, B. E. 1963. Fossil plants from the lower Paleocene of the Agatdalen (Angmartussut) area, central Nugssuaq Peninsula, northwest Greenland. Meddel. GrØnland172(5): 1–120 + 55 plates.Google Scholar
  29. Lange, R. T. 1970. The Maslin Bay flora, South Australia. 2. The assemblage of fossils. Neues Jahrb. Geol. PalÄontol., Monatsh.1970 (Heft 8): 486–490.Google Scholar
  30. Leopold, E. B. &H. D. MacGinitie 1972. Development and affinities of Tertiary floras in the Rocky Mountains, pp. 147–200.In: Alan Graham (Ed.), Floristics and Paleofloristics of Asia and eastern North America. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  31. MacGinitie, H. D. 1941. A middle Eocene flora from the central Sierra Nevada. Publ. Carnegie Inst. Wash.543. 178 pp., 47 plates.Google Scholar
  32. - 1953. Fossil plants of the Florissant beds, Colorado. Publ. Carnegie Inst. Wash.599. 198 pp., 75 plates.Google Scholar
  33. Mathiesen, Fr. J. 1932. Notes on some fossil plants from East Greenland. Meddel. GrØnland85(4): 1–62.Google Scholar
  34. Mathur, Y. K. 1966. On the microflora in the Supra Trappeans of western Kutch, India. Quart. J. Geol. Mining Metallurg. Soc. India38: 33–51.Google Scholar
  35. Muller, Jan 1969. Palynological evidence on early differentiation of angiosperms. Abstr. XI Int. Bot. Cong. (Seattle) p. 154.Google Scholar
  36. — 1970. Palynological evidence on early differentiation of angiosperms. Biol. Rev. (London)45: 417–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Page, V. M. 1968. Angiosperm wood from the Upper Cretaceous of central California, II. Amer. J. Bot.55: 165–172.Google Scholar
  38. — 1970. Angiosperm wood from the Upper Cretaceous of central California, III. Amer. J. Bot.57: 1139–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pflug, H. D. 1953. Zur Entstehung und Entwicklung des angiospermiden Pollens in der Erdgeschichte. Palaeontographica, Abt. B, PalÄophytol.95: 60–171.Google Scholar
  40. Read, R. W. &L. J. Hickey 1972. A revised classification of fossil palm and palm-like leaves. Taxon21: 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scott, R. A. 1954. Fossil fruits and seeds from the Eocene Clarno formation of Oregon. Palaeontographica, Abt. B, PalÄophytol.96: 66–97 + plates 15, 16.Google Scholar
  42. & E. S. Barghoorn 1955. The occurrence ofEuptelea in the Cenozoic of western North America. J. Arnold Arbor.36: 259–265 + 3 plates.Google Scholar
  43. & E. B. Leopold 1960. How old are the angiosperms? Amer. J. Sci.258A: 284–299.Google Scholar
  44. Scott, R. A., P. L. Williams, L. C. Craig, E. S. Barghoorn, L. J. Hickey &H. D. MacGinitie 1972. “Pre-Cretaceous” angiosperms from Utah: Evidence for Tertiary age of the palm woods. Amer. J. Bot.59: 886–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering Plants: Origin and Dispersal (translated by C. Jeffrey). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. 310 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Tanai, T. 1972. Tertiary history of vegetation in Japan, pp. 235–255. In: Alan Graham (Ed.), Floristics and Paleofloristics of Asia and Eastern North America. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  47. Tidwell, W. D., S. R. Rushforth, J. L. Reveal &Homer Behunin 1969.Palmoxylon simperi andPalmoxylon pristina: two pre-Cretaceous angiosperms from Utah. Science168: 835–840.Google Scholar
  48. Tschudy, B. D. 1971. Two new fossil pollen genera from upper Campanian (Cretaceous) rocks of Montana. Profess. Pap. U.S. Geol. Surv.750-B. pp. B53-B61.Google Scholar
  49. Willis, J. C. 1966. A Dictionary of the Flowering Plants and Ferns (revised by H. K. Airy Shaw). Cambridge: University Press. 1214 pp.Google Scholar
  50. Wolfe, J. A. 1959. Tertiary Juglandaceae of western North America. Thesis: M.A., University of California, Berkeley. 110 pp.Google Scholar
  51. — 1966. Tertiary plants from the Cook Inlet region, Alaska. Profess. Pap. U.S. Geol. Surv.398-B. pp. B1-B32, 8 plates.Google Scholar
  52. - 1968. Paleogene biostratigraphy of nonmarine rocks in King County, Washington. Profess. Pap. U.S. Geol. Surv.571. 33 pp., 7 plates.Google Scholar
  53. — 1971. Tertiary climatic fluctuations and methods of analysis of Tertiary floras. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.9: 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. — 1972a. An interpretation of Alaskan Tertiary floras, pp. 201–233. In: Alan Graham (Ed.), Floristics and Paleofloristics of Asia and Eastern North America. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  55. — 1972b. Phyletic significance of Lower Cretaceous dicotyledonous leaves from the Patuxent Formation. Amer. J. Bot.59: 664.Google Scholar
  56. & H. M. Pakiser 1971. Stratigraphic interpretations of some Cretaceous microfossil floras of the middle Atlantic States. Profess. Pap. U.S. Geol. Surv.750-B. pp. B35-B47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack A. Wolfe
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyMenlo Park

Personalised recommendations