Quality, accessibility, and contraceptive use in rural tanzania
- 158 Downloads
We examine how informants’reports on community perceptions of the quality and accessibility offamily planningfacilities relate to the use of modern contraceptives by individuals in rural Tanzania. Using information on individual-level contraceptive use in conjunction with community-level information on the accessibility and quality of family planning facilities, we employ two distinct statistical procedures to illustrate the impacts of accessibility and quality on contraceptive use. Both procedures treat the community-level variables as imperfect indicators of characteristics of the facilities, and they yield nearly identical implications. Wefind that a communitylevel, subjective perception of a family planning facility s quality has a significant impact on community members’ contraceptive use whereas other community measures such as time, distance, and subjective perception of accessibility have trivial and insignificant direct impacts, net of the control variables. Future research that uncovers the determinants of perceptions of both community-level and individual-level quality could provide key insights for developing effective and efficientfamily planning programs.
KeywordsFamily Planning Travel Time Family Planning Service Family Plan Informant Report
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adeokun, L.A. 1994. “Service Quality and Family Planning Outreach in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Pp. 235–49 inThe Onset of Fertility Transition in Sub-Saharan Africa, edited by T. Locoh and V. Hetrich. Liege: Derouaux Ordina Editions.Google Scholar
- —. 1998b. “Targeted Program Placement and the Estimation of the Impact of Family Planning Programs on Fertility in Peru.” Working paper, The EVALUATION Project, Carolina Population Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.Google Scholar
- Bollen, K.A., I.S. Speizer, T.A. Mroz, and S.A.M. Ngallaba. 1996. “Subjective and Objective Measures of Distance to Family Planning Facilities in Rural Tanzania.” Revision of paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans.Google Scholar
- Efron, B. and R.J. Tibshirani. 1993.An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- Feyisetan, B.J. and M. Ainsworth. 1994. “Contraceptive Use and the Quality, Price, and Availability of Family Planning in Nigeria.” LSMS Working Paper No.108, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Oliver, R. 1995. “Contraceptive Use in Ghana: The Role of Service Availability, Quality, and Price.” LSMS Working Paper No. 111, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Pullum, T. 1991. “Community Level Data Collection and Analysis.” Pp. 807–26 inDemographic and Health Surveys World Conference, August 5–7, 1991, Washington, D.C.; Proceedings, Vol. 2. Columbia, MD: IRD/Macro International.Google Scholar
- Rodríguez, G. 1977. “Assessing the Availability of Fertility Regulation Methods: Report on a Methodological Study.”World Fertility Survey Scientific Reports, No. 1.Google Scholar
- Thomas, D. and J. Maluccio, 1995. “Contraceptive Choice, Fertility, and Public Policy in Zimbabwe.” LSMS Working Paper No. 109, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Tsui, A.D. and L.R. Ochoa. 1992. “Service Proximity as a Determinant of Contraceptive Behaviour: Evidence from Cross-National Studies of Survey Data.” Pp. 222–56 inFamily Planning Programmes and Fertility, edited by J.F. Phillips and J.A. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar