Demography

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 139–154 | Cite as

Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources

  • Dan Black
  • Gary Gates
  • Seth Sanders
  • Lowell Taylor
Gay and Lesbian Populations

Abstract

This work provides an overview of standard social science data sources that now allow some systematic study of the gay and lesbian population in the United States. For each data source, we consider how sexual orientation can be defined, and we note the potential sample sizes. We give special attention to the important problem of measurement error, especially the extent to which individuals recorded as gay and lesbian are indeed recorded correctly. Our concern is that because gays and lesbians constitute a relatively small fraction of the population, modest measurement problems could lead to serious errors in inference. In examining gays and lesbians in multiple data sets we also achieve a second objective: We provide a set of statistics about this population that is relevant to several current policy debates.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badgett, M.V.L. 1995. “The Wage Effects of Sexual Orientation Discrimination.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48: 726–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G.S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Black, D.A., G. Gates, S. Sanders, and L. Taylor. 1997. “The Effects of Sexual Orientation on the Wages of Men.” Working paper, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  4. Black, D.A. 1999. “Why Do Gay Men Live in San Francisco?” Working paper, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  5. Black, D.A., H. Makar, S. Sanders, and L. Taylor. 1998. “The Effects of Sexual Orientation on Earnings.” Working paper, Heinz School, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  6. Bumpass, L.L. and J. Sweet. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.” Demography 26:615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jepsen, L. 1998. Essays on the Economics of Marriage: An Empirical Study of Same-Sex and Opposite-Sex Couples. PhD dissertation, Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  8. Jepsen, L. and C. Jepsen. 1999. “An Empirical Analysis of Same Sex and Opposite-Sex Couples: Do ‘Likes’ Still Like ‘Likes’ in the ’90s?” Working paper, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  9. Kinsey, A.C., W.B. Pomeroy, C.E. Martin, and P.H. Gebhard. 1948. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  10. Klawitter, M.M. 1997. “The Effects of Sexual Orientation on the Determinants of Earnings for Women.” Working paper, Graduate School of Public Affairs, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  11. Klawitter, M.M. and V. Flatt. 1998. “The Effects of State and Local Antidiscrimination Policies on Earnings for Gays and Lesbians.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17:658–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krieger, L.M. 1993. “S.F. Remains a Mecca for Gay Couples: Census Data Reveal Same-Sex Households Abound in the City.” San Francisco Examiner, September 12, pp. A1, A10.Google Scholar
  13. Laumann, E.O., J.H. Gagnon, R.T. Michael, and S. Michaels. 1994. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Michael, R.T., J.H. Gagnon, E.O. Laumann, and G. Kolata. 1994. Sex in America: A Definitive Study. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  15. “S.F. Seeks Equal Treatment.” 1996. San Jose Mercury News, December 29, p. 3b.Google Scholar
  16. U.S. Census Bureau. 1975. “Accuracy of Data for Selected Population Characteristics as Measured by the 1970 CPS-Census Match.” 1970 Census of Population and Housing, Evaluation and Research Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1993. “Content Reinterview Survey: Accuracy of Data for Selected Population and Housing Characteristics as Measured by Reinterview.” 1990 Census of Population and Housing, Research and Evaluation Report, CPH-E-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Black
    • 1
  • Gary Gates
    • 2
  • Seth Sanders
    • 3
  • Lowell Taylor
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Policy ResearchSyracuse UniversitySyracuse
  2. 2.Heinz School of Public Policy and ManagementCarnegie Mellon UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MarylandUSA
  4. 4.Heinz School of Public Policy and ManagementCarnegie Mellon UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations