Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 205–217 | Cite as

Life course transitions of American children: Parental cohabitation, marriage, and single motherhood

  • Deborah Roempke GraefeEmail author
  • Daniel T. Lichter
Marital Patterns, Living Arrangements, and Intergenerational Relations

Abstract

We examine the life course transitions into and from families headed by unmarried cohabiting couples for a recent cohort of American children. Life table estimates, based on data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth mother-child files, indicate about one in four children will live in a family headed by a cohabiting couple sometime during childhood. Economic uncertainty is an important factor determining whether children in single-parent families subsequently share a residence with a mother’s unmarried partner. Moreover, virtually all children in cohabiting-couple families will experience rapid subsequent changes in family status. Our estimates provide a point of departure for future work on children’s exposure to parental cohabitation and its social and economic implications.

Keywords

Single Mother American Child Unmarried Partner Couple Family Life Table Estimate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison, P.D. 1982. “Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories.” Pp. 61–98 in Sociological Methodology, edited by S. Leinhardt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, P.C., C.K. Keck, F.L. Mott, and S.V. Quinlan. 1993. NLSY Child Handbook, A Guide to the 1986–1990 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, Child Data. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, Center for Human Resource Research.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, J., L. Youngblade, M. Rovine, and B. Volling. 1991. “Patterns of Marital Change and Parent-Child Interaction.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:487–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blossfeld, H., A. Hamerle, and K. Ulrich-Mayer. 1989. Event History Analysis, Statistical Theory and Application in the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Bumpass, L.L. and H.-H. Lu. 1998. “Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children’s Family Contexts.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Bumpass, L. L., R.K. Raley, and J.A. Sweet. 1995. “The Changing Character of Stepfamilies: Implications of Cohabitation and Nonmarital Childbearing.” Demography 32:425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bumpass, L.L. and J.A. Sweet. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.” Demography 26:615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bumpass, L., J. Sweet, and A. Cherlin. 1991. “The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:913–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edin, K. and L. Lein. 1997. Making Ends Meet: How Single Moth-ers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Eggebeen, D.J. and D.T. Lichter. 1991. “Race, Family Structure, and Changing Poverty Among American Children.” American Sociological Review 56:801–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldscheider, F.K and L.J. Waite. 1986. “Sex Differences in the Entry Into Marriage.” American Journal of Sociology 92:91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guilkey, D.K. and R.R. Rindfuss. 1987. “Logistic Regression Multivariate Life Tables: A Communicable Approach.” Sociological Methods & Research 16:276–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haaga, J. and R.A. Moffitt, eds. 1998. Welfare, the Family, and Reproductive Behavior, Report of a Meeting.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Landale, N.S. and R. Forste. 1991. “Patterns of Entry Into Cohabitation and Marriage Among Mainland Puerto Rican Women.” Demography 28:587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landale, N.S. and S. Hauan. 1992. “The Family Life Course of Puerto Rican Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54:912–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lichter, D.T. 1997. “Poverty and Inequality Among Children.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:121–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lichter, D.T, F. LeClere, and D.K. McLaughlin. 1991. “Local Marriage Markets and the Marital Behavior of Black and White Women.” American Journal of Sociology 96:843–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLanahan, S. and G. Sandefur. 1994. Growing up With a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Manning, W. D. 1993. “Marriage and Cohabitation Following Premarital Conception.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 55:839–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manning, W.D. and N.S. Landale. 1996. “Racial and Ethnic Differ-ences in the Role of Cohabitation in Premarital Childbearing.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manning, W.D. and D.T. Lichter. 1996. “Parental Cohabitation and Children’s Economic Well-Being.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:998–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manning, W.D. and P.J. Smock. 1995. “Why Marry? Race and the Transition to Marriage Among Cohabitors.” Demography 32:509–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martinson, B.C. and L.L. Wu. 1992. “Parent Histories: Patterns of Change in Early Life.” Journal of Family Issues 13:351–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Conner, T.G., N. Hawkins, J. Dunn, K. Thorpe, J. Golding, and the ASDPAC Study Team. 1998. “Family Type and Depression in Pregnancy: Factors Mediating Risk in a Community Sample.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 60:757–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oropesa, R.S. 1996. “Normative Beliefs About Marriage and Cohabitation: A Comparison of Non-Latino Whites, Mexican Americans, and Puerto Ricans.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rindfuss, R.R. and A. VandenHeuvel. 1990. “Cohabitation: A Precursor to Marriage or an Alternative to Being Single?” Population and Development Review 16:703–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saluter, A.F. 1994. Marital Status and Living Arrangements: March 1993. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P20-478. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  28. Smock, P.J. and W.D. Manning. 1997. “Cohabiting Partners’ Economic Circumstances and Marriage.” Demography 34:331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. South, S.J. and K.M. Lloyd. 1992. “Marriage Opportunities and Family Formation: Further Implications of unbalanced Sex Ratios.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54:440–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stets, J.E. 1991. “Cohabiting and Marital Aggression: The Role of Social Isolation.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:669–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomson, E., T.L. Hanson, and S.S. McLanahan. 1994. “Family Structure and Child Well-being: Economic Resources Versus Parental Behaviors.” Social Forces 73(l):221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thornton, A. 1991. “Influence of the Marital History of Parents on the Marriage and Cohabitation Experiences of Children.” American Journal of Sociology 96:868–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waite, L.J. and L.A. Lillard. 1991. “Children and Marital Disruption.” American Journal of Sociology 96:930–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu, L.L. and B.C. Martinson. 1993. “Family Structure and the Risk of a Premarital Birth.” American Sociological Review 58:210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu, Z. 1995. “The Stability of Cohabitation Relationships: The Role of Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 5:231–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wu, Z. and T.R. Balakrishnan. 1995. “Dissolution of Premarital Cohabitation in Canada.” Demography 32:521–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zill, N., K.A. Moore, E.W. Smith, T. Stief, and M.J. Coiro. 1995. “The Life Circumstances and Development of Children in Welfare Families: A Profile Based on National Survey Data.” Pp. 38–59 in Escape From Poverty: What Makes a Difference for Children?, edited by P.L. Chase-Lansdale and J. Brooks-Gunn. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Population Research InstitutePennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations