Demography

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 83–94 | Cite as

The effect of pregnancy intention on child development

  • Theodore J. Joyce
  • Robert Kaestner
  • Sanders Korenman
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we use data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth to investigate the empirical link between unintended pregnancy and child health and development. An important contribution of our study is the use of information on siblings to control for unmeasured factors that may confound estimates of the effect of pregnancy intentions on infant and child outcomes. Results from our study indicate that unwanted pregnancy is associated with prenatal and postpartum maternal behaviors that adversely affect infant and child health, but that unwanted pregnancy has little association with birth weight and child cognitive outcomes. Estimates of the association between unwanted pregnancy and maternal behaviors were greatly reduced after controls for unmeasured family background were included in the model. Our results also indicate that there are no significant differences in maternal behaviors or child outcomes between mistimed and wanted pregnancies.

References

  1. Baker, P.C., C.K. Keck, F.L. Mott, and S.V. Quinlan. 1993. NLSY Child Handbook. Columbus, OH: Center for Human Resource Research.Google Scholar
  2. Baydar, N. 1995. “Consequences for Children of Their Birth Planning Status.” Family Planning Perspectives 27:228–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G.S. and H.G. Lewis. 1973. “On the Interaction Between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy 81:S279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ]Brown, S.S. and L. Eisenberg, eds. 1995. The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-being of Children and Families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bustan, M.N. and A.L. Coker. 1994. “Maternal Attitude Toward Pregnancy and the Risk of Neonatal Death.” American Journal of Public Health 84:411–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron, P. and J.C. Titchenor. 1976. “The Swedish ‘Children Born to Women Denied Abortion’ Study: A Radical Criticism.” Psychological Reports 39:391–94.Google Scholar
  7. Center for Human Resources. 1994. NLS Handbook. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Center for Human Resources.Google Scholar
  8. Chamberlin, G. 1980. “Analysis of Covariance With Qualitative Data.” Review of Economic Studies 47:225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. David, H.P. 1981. “Unwantedness: Longitudinal Studies of Prague Children Born to Women Twice Denied Abortion for the Same Pregnancy and Matched Controls. Pp. 81–102 in Coping With Medical Issues: Pregnancy, Childbirth and Parenthood. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. David, H.P., Z. Matejcek, Z. Dytrych, V. Schuller, H.L. Friedman. 1977. “Developmental Consequences of Unwanted Pregnancies: Studies From Sweden and Czechoslovakia. Pp. 184–89 in Basic Problems in Cross-Cultural Psychology, edited by Y.H. Poortinga. Amstermdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  11. David, H.P., Z. Dytrych, Z. Matejcek, and V. Schuller. 1988. Born Unwanted: Developmental Effects of Denied Abortion. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Duncan, G. and J. Brooks-Gunn. 1997. Consequences of Growing Up Poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Forrest, J.D. 1994. “Preventing Unwanted Pregnancy: The Role of Hormonal Contraceptives.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 170(5, part 2):1485–89.Google Scholar
  14. Forssman, H. and I. Thuwe. 1988. “The Goteberg Cohort, 1939–77.” Pp. 37–45 in Born Unwanted: Developmental Effects of Denied Abortion, edited by H.P. David, Z. Dytrich, Z. Matejcek, and V. Schuller. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Geronimus, A.T. and S. Korenman. 1993. “Maternal Youth or Family Background? On the Health Disadvantages of Infants With Teenage Mothers.” American Journal of Epidemiology 137: 213–26.Google Scholar
  16. Geronimus, A.T., S. Korenman, and M.M. Hillemeier. 1994. “Does Young Maternal Age Adversely Affect Child Development? Evidence From Cousin Comparisons.” Population and Development Review 20:585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffman, S.D., E.M. Foster, and F. Furstenberg. 1993. “Re-Evaluating the Costs of Teenage Childbearing.” Demography 30:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hook, K. 1975. “The Unwanted Child—Effects on Mothers and Children of Refused Application for Abortion.” Pp. 187–92 in Society, Stress and Disease, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Hotz, J., S. McElroy, and S. Sanders. 1995. “The Costs and Consequences of Teenage Childbearing for Mothers.” Pp. 1–130 in Kids Having Kids: The Consequences of Teenage Childbearing in the United States. New York: Robin Hood Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Huber, P.J. 1967. “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Non-Standard Conditions.” Pp. 221–33 in Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Klerman, L.V. and J.F. Jekel. 1984. “Unwanted Pregnancy.” Pp. 283–300 in Perinatal Epidemiology, edited by M.B. Bracken. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kost, K., J. Forrest, and S. Singh. “The Impact of Pregnancy Intention Status on Women’s Behavior During Pregnancy and on Birth Outcomes.” New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Kubicka, L., Z. Matejcek, H.P. David, Z. Dytrych, W.B. Miller, and Z. Roth. 1995. “Children From Unwanted Pregnancies in Prague, Czech Republic Revisited at Age Thirty.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 91:361–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marsiglio, W. and F.L. Mott. 1988. “Does Wanting to Become Pregnant With a First Child Affect Subsequent Maternal Behaviors and Infant Birth Weight?” Journal of Marriage and the Family 50:1023–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Michael, R.T. and R.J. Willis. 1975. “Contraception and Fertility: Household Production Under Uncertainty.” Pp. 27–98 in Household Production and Consumption, edited by N.E. Terleckyj. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Miller, W. 1974. “Relationship Between the Intendedness of Con ception and the Wantedness of Pregnancy.” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 159:396–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Myhrman, A., P. Olsen, P. Rantakallio, and E. Laara. 1995. “Does the Wantedness of a Pregnancy Predict a Child’s Educational Attainment?” Family Planning Perspectives 27(3):116–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. — 1993. “Maternal Expectations and Ex Post Realizations.” Journal of Human Resources 28:205–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sable, M.R., J.C. Spencer, J.W. Stockbauer, W. Schramm, V. Howell, and A.A. Herman. 1997. “Pregnancy Wantedness and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Differences by Race and Medicaid Status.” Family Planning Perspectives 29(2):76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schoen, R., N.M. Astone, Y.J. Kim, C.A. Nathanson, J.M. Fields, and N. Murray. 1999. “Linking Intentions and Behavior.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Population and Family Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  31. StataCorp. 1997. Stata Statistical Software: Release 5.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
  32. Weller, R.H., I.W. Eberstein, and M. Bailey. 1987. “Pregnancy Wantedness and Maternal Behavior During Pregnancy.” Demography 24:407–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Westoff, C.F. and N.B. Ryder. 1977. “The Predictive Validity of Reproductive Intentions.” Demography 14:431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore J. Joyce
    • 1
  • Robert Kaestner
    • 1
  • Sanders Korenman
    • 1
  1. 1.Baruch College and NBERUSA

Personalised recommendations