Interrelated family-building behaviors: Cohabitation, marriage, and nonmarital conception
- 347 Downloads
Data from the National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972 are used to estimate a series of models of entry into marriage, entry into cohabitation, and nonmarital pregnancy. Our models account explicitly for the endogeneity of one outcome as a predictor of another by taking into account both heterogeneity across individuals due to unmeasured factors that may affect all these outcomes and the correlation in the unmeasured factors across processes. We find that these heterogeneity components are strongly and positively related across the outcomes. Women who are more likely to cohabit, marry, or become pregnant while unmarried are also more likely to do each of the others. Although black and white women differ in the likelihood of these behaviors, the interrelations of the behaviors are quite similar across groups.
KeywordsWhite Woman Black Woman Marriage Market Heterogeneity Component High School Class
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Becker, G.S. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Brien, M.J, L.A. Lillard, and S. Stern. 1999. Cohabitation, Marriage, and Divorce in a Model of Match Quality.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
- Hotz, V.J., J.A. Klerman, and R.J. Willis. 1997. “The Economics of Fertility in Developed Countries.” Pp. 275–347 in Handbook of Population Economics, Vol. 1A, edited by M.R. Rosenzweig and O. Stark. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Laumann, E.O., J.H. Gagnon, R.T. Michael, and S. Michaels. 1994. The Social Organization of Sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Lillard, L.A. and T. Cottet. 1998. “Some Monte-Carlo Results on the Impact of Heterogeneity Distributional Assumptions in Replicated Hazard Models.” Working paper, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1974. Educational Attainment in the United States. Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 274. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Ventura, S., J. Martin, T. Mathews, and S. Clarke. 1996. “Advance Report of Final Natality Statistics, 1994.” Monthly Vital Statistics Report 44(11):Supplement. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
- Waite, L.J. and K. Joyner. Forthcoming. “Emotional and Physical Satisfaction With Sex in Married, Cohabiting and Dating Sexual Unions: Do Men and Women Differ?” In Studies on Sex, edited by E. Laumann and R. Michael. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Willis, R. and R. Michael. 1994. “Innovation in Family Formation: Evidence on Cohabitation in the United States.” Pp. 119–45 in The Family, the Market and the State of Aging Societies, edited by J. Ermisch and N. Ogawa. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar