, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 339–350 | Cite as

You can go home again: Evidence from longitudinal data

  • Patricia B. ReaganEmail author
  • Randall J. Olsen


In this paper we analyze the economic and demographic factors that influence return migration, focusing on generation 1.5 immigrants. Using longitudinal data from the 1979 youth cohort of the National Longitudinal Surveys (NLSY79), we track residential histories of young immigrants to the United States and analyze the covariates associated with return migration to their home country. Overall, return migration appears to respond to economic incentives, as well as to cultural and linguistic ties to the United States and the home country. We find no role for welfare magnets in the decision to return, but we learn that welfare participation leads to lower probability of return migration. Finally, we see no evidence of a skill bias in return migration, where skill is measured by performance on the Armed Forces Qualifying Test.


Home Country Return Migration National Longitudinal Survey Welfare Participation Potential Wage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borjas, G.J. 1987. “Self Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants.” American Economic Review 77:531–53.Google Scholar
  2. —. 1991. “Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market: 1940–80.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 81:287–91.Google Scholar
  3. —. 1994. “The Economics of Immigration.” Journal of Economic Literature 32:1667–717.Google Scholar
  4. Borjas, G.J.. 1997. “Immigration and Welfare Magnets.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  5. Borjas, G.J. and B. Bratsberg. 1996. “Who Leaves? The Emigration of the Foreign-Born.” Review of Economics and Statistics 78(1):165–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borjas, G.J. and L. Hilton. 1996. “Immigration and the Welfare State: Immigrant Participation in Means-Tested Entitlement Programs.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111:575–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borjas, G.J. and S.J. Trejo. 1991. “Immigrant Participation in the Welfare System.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 44(1):195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiswick, B.R. 1978. “The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-Born Men.” Journal of Political Economy 86:897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. —. 1986. “Is the New Immigrant Less Skilled Than the Old?” Journal of Labor Economics 4(2):168–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobb-Clark, D.A. 1993. “Immigrant Selectivity and Wages: The Evidence for Women.” American Economic Review 83:986–93.Google Scholar
  11. Currie, J. 1996. “Do Children of Immigrants Make Differential Use of Public Health Insurance?” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, UCLA.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, P. 1919. “Is the New Immigrant More Unskilled Than the Old?” Journal of the American Statistical Association 16:393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duleep, H.O. 1994. “Social Security and the Emigration of Immigrants.” Social Security Bulletin 57(1):37–52.Google Scholar
  14. Jasso, G. and M.R. Rosenzweig. 1982. “Estimating the Emigration Rates of Legal Immigrants Using Administrative and Survey Data: The 1971 Cohort of Immigrants to the United States.” Demography 19:279–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindstrom, D.P. 1996. “Economic Opportunity in Mexico and Return Migration From the United States.” Demography 33:357–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Margrabe, W. 1978. “The Value of an Option to Exchange the Option for Another.” Journal of Finance 33(3):177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin, J. 1995. “Immigration Contributes Over Half to U.S. Population Growth.” Immigration Review 23(3):10–20.Google Scholar
  18. Neal, D. and W. Johnson. 1996. “The Role of Premarket Factors in Black-White Wage Differences.” Journal of Political Economy 104:869–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Walker, J. 1993. “Migration Among Low-Income Households: Helping the Witch Doctors Reach Consensus.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Center for Human Resource Research, 921 Chatham LaneOhio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations