, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 115–132 | Cite as

The validity of survey responses on abortion: Evidence from Estonia

  • Barbara A. Anderson
  • Kalev Katus
  • Allan Puur
  • Brian D. Silver
Measurement, Migration, Marriage, and Mortality


This paper presents results of a validation survey of abortion conducted in Tallinn, Estonia in April and May 1992. The sample was drawn from patient records in a maternity hospital. Women who had an abortion in that hospital in 1991 were asked about recent abortions as part of a survey about women’s health. More than 80% of the respondents reported having a recent abortion. Some respondents misreported their abortion as a miscarriage. Moreover, some variation in reporting was associated with respondents’ characteristics. Ethnic Estonians were less likely to report their abortion than were Russians, women over age 40 were less likely to report the abortion than younger women, and women who had the abortion late in the first trimester were less likely to report that abortion. There was some evidence that unmarried women were less likely than married women to report their abortion, and that women who had borne three or more children were less likely to report their abortion than women who had borne fewer children. These differences probably stem from the extent to which pregnancy or abortion is considered stigmatizing for women in different situations.


Live Birth Survey Response Maternity Hospital Unmarried Woman Response Validity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, Barbara A. and Brian D. Silver. 1986. “Measurement and Mismeasurement of the Validity of the Self-Reported Vote.” American Journal of Political Science 30:771–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. —. 1987. “The Validity of Survey Responses: Insights from Interviews of Married Couples in a Survey of Soviet Emigrants.” Social Forces 66:537–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bondarskaia, Galina and Leonid Darskii. 1988. “Etnicheskaia differentsiia rozhdaemosti v SSSR” [Ethnic differentiation of fertility in the USSR]. Vestnik statistiki 12:16–21.Google Scholar
  4. Bradburn, Norman M. 1983. “Response Effects.” pp. 289–328 in Handbook of Survey Research, editedby Peter H. Rossi, James D. Wright, and Andy B. Anderson. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bradburn, Norman M., Seymour Sudman, and associates. 1980. Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design: Response Effects to Threatening Questions in Survey Research. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Casterline, John B. and V. C. Chidambaram. 1984. “The Presence of Others during the Interview and the Reporting of Contraceptive Knowledge and Use.” pp. 267–98 in Survey Analysis for the Guidance of Family Planning Programs, edited by John A. Ross and Regina McNamara. Liège: ORDINA.Google Scholar
  7. Clausen, Aage R. 1968-1969. “Response Validity: Vote Report.” Public Opinion Quarterly 32:588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan, Greg J. and Nancy A. Mathiowitz. 1985. A Validation Study of Economic Survey Data. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  9. Haberman, Paul W. and Jack Elinson. 1967. “Family Income Reported in Surveys: Husbands versus Wives.” Journal of Marketing Research 4: 191–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henshaw, Stanley K. 1991. “Characteristics of U.S. Women Having Abortions, 1987.” Family Planning Perspectives 23 (2):75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, Elise and Jacqueline Forrest. 1992. “Underreporting of Abortion in Surveys of U.S. Women: 1976–1988.” Demography 29:113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koenig, M. A., G. B. Simmons and B. D. Misra. 1984. “Husband-Wife Inconsistencies in Contraceptive Use Responses.” Population Studies 38:281–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loftus, Elizabeth F., Kyle D. Smith, Mark R. Klinger, and Judith Fiedler. 1992. “Memory and Mismemory for Health Events.” Pp. 102–37 in Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, edited by Judith M. Tanur. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Schuman, Howard and Stanley Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Silver, Brian D., Paul R. Abramson, and Barbara A. Anderson. 1986. “The Presence of Others and Overreporting of Voting in American National Elections.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 228–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Silver, Brian D., Barbara A. Anderson, and Paul R. Abramson. 1986. “Who Overreports Voting?” American Political Science Review 80:613–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sudman, Seymour and Norman M. Bradburn. 1974. Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  18. Traugott, Michael W. and John P. Katosh. 1979. “Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43:359–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. USSR, Goskomstat. 1990. Demograficheskii ezhegodnik SSSR, 1990 [Demographic Yearbook of the USSR, 1990]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara A. Anderson
    • 1
  • Kalev Katus
    • 2
  • Allan Puur
    • 2
  • Brian D. Silver
    • 3
  1. 1.Population Studies CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  2. 2.Estonian Inter-University Population Research CenterTallinnEstonia
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing

Personalised recommendations