The validity of survey responses on abortion: Evidence from Estonia
- 52 Downloads
This paper presents results of a validation survey of abortion conducted in Tallinn, Estonia in April and May 1992. The sample was drawn from patient records in a maternity hospital. Women who had an abortion in that hospital in 1991 were asked about recent abortions as part of a survey about women’s health. More than 80% of the respondents reported having a recent abortion. Some respondents misreported their abortion as a miscarriage. Moreover, some variation in reporting was associated with respondents’ characteristics. Ethnic Estonians were less likely to report their abortion than were Russians, women over age 40 were less likely to report the abortion than younger women, and women who had the abortion late in the first trimester were less likely to report that abortion. There was some evidence that unmarried women were less likely than married women to report their abortion, and that women who had borne three or more children were less likely to report their abortion than women who had borne fewer children. These differences probably stem from the extent to which pregnancy or abortion is considered stigmatizing for women in different situations.
KeywordsLive Birth Survey Response Maternity Hospital Unmarried Woman Response Validity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bondarskaia, Galina and Leonid Darskii. 1988. “Etnicheskaia differentsiia rozhdaemosti v SSSR” [Ethnic differentiation of fertility in the USSR]. Vestnik statistiki 12:16–21.Google Scholar
- Bradburn, Norman M. 1983. “Response Effects.” pp. 289–328 in Handbook of Survey Research, editedby Peter H. Rossi, James D. Wright, and Andy B. Anderson. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Bradburn, Norman M., Seymour Sudman, and associates. 1980. Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design: Response Effects to Threatening Questions in Survey Research. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Casterline, John B. and V. C. Chidambaram. 1984. “The Presence of Others during the Interview and the Reporting of Contraceptive Knowledge and Use.” pp. 267–98 in Survey Analysis for the Guidance of Family Planning Programs, edited by John A. Ross and Regina McNamara. Liège: ORDINA.Google Scholar
- Duncan, Greg J. and Nancy A. Mathiowitz. 1985. A Validation Study of Economic Survey Data. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Loftus, Elizabeth F., Kyle D. Smith, Mark R. Klinger, and Judith Fiedler. 1992. “Memory and Mismemory for Health Events.” Pp. 102–37 in Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, edited by Judith M. Tanur. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Schuman, Howard and Stanley Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Sudman, Seymour and Norman M. Bradburn. 1974. Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- USSR, Goskomstat. 1990. Demograficheskii ezhegodnik SSSR, 1990 [Demographic Yearbook of the USSR, 1990]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika.Google Scholar