Demography

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 249–270 | Cite as

Neighborhood Context and Residential Mobility

  • Barrett A. Lee
  • R. S. Oropesa
  • James W. Kanan
Neighborhoods

Abstract

This paper extends the search for neighborhood contextual effects to residential mobility. We propose that neighborhood consists of subjective and objective domains, both of which are crosscut by substantive (social/physical) and temporal (current/change) dimensions. Measures of neighborhood characteristics consistent with our conceptualization are used to estimate the impact of context on mobility thoughts and on actual mobility in a sample of Nashville residents. Although individual statuses such as age and tenure remain important antecedents of mobility, subjective features of neighborhood context also play a role—albeit limited and indirect—in the decision to move or to stay.

Keywords

American Sociological Review Residential Mobility Subjective Context Neighborhood Context Actual Mobility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, R.L. and J. Smith. 1977. “Community Satisfaction, Expectations of Moving, and Migration.” Demography 14:147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billy, J.O.G., W.R. Grady, M.D Hayward, T.W Pullum, K.L Brewster, D.E Moore, D.H Klepinger, and B.A Rader. 1989. Effects of Contextual Factors on Fertility Regulation and Fertility, Vol.1. Seattle: Battelle Human Affairs Research Centers.Google Scholar
  3. Billy, J.O.G. and D.E. Moore. 1992. “A Multilevel Analysis of Marital and Nonmarital Fertility in the U.S.” Social Forces 70:977–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blalock, H.M., Jr. 1984. “Contextual-Effects Models: Theoretical and Methodological Issues.” Annual Review of Sociology 10:353–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehm, T.P. and K.R. Ihlanfeldt. 1986. “Residential Mobility and Neighborhood Quality.” Journal of Regional Science 26:411–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewster, K.L., J.O.G. Billy, and W.R. Grady. 1993. “Social Context and Adolescent Behavior: The Impact of Community on the Transition to Sexual Activity.” Social Forces 71:713–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks-Gunn, J., G.J. Duncan, P.K. Klebanov, and N. Sealand. 1993. “Do Neighborhoods Influence Child and Adolescent Development?” American Journal of Sociology 99:353–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, L.A. and D.B. Longbrake. 1970. “Migration Flows in Intra-Urban Space: Place Utility Considerations.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 60:368–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, L.A. and E.G. Moore. 1970. “The Intra-Urban Migration Process: A Perspective.” Geografiska Annaler (Series B) 52:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, E.W., F.S. Chapin Jr., G.C. Hemmens, E.J. Kaiser, M.A. Stegman, and S.F. Weiss. 1969. Moving Behavior and Residential Choice: A National Survey. Washington, DC: Highway Research Board, National Research Council.Google Scholar
  11. Casterline, J.B., Ed. 1985. The Collection and Analysis of Community Data. Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Clogg, C.C. and S.R. Eliason. 1987. “Some Common Problems in Log-Linear Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 16:8–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, R.P. Undated. “Attitudes toward Neighborhoods: How Americans Choose to Live.” Working Paper No. 49, Joint Center for Urban Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University.Google Scholar
  14. Coleman, R.P. and B. Neugarten. 1972. Social Status in the City. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Converse, J.M. and S. Presser. 1986. Survey Questions: Handcrafting the Standardized Questionnaire. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Covington, J. and R.B. Taylor. 1991. “Fear of Crime in Urban Residential Neighborhoods: Implications of Between- and Within-Neighborhood Sources for Current Models.” Sociological Quarterly 32:231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crane, J. 1991. “The Epidemic Theory of Ghettos and Neighborhood Effects on Dropping Out and Teenage Childbearing.” American Journal of Sociology 96:1226–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Datcher, L. 1982. “Effects of Community and Family Background on Achievement.” Review of Economics and Statistics 64:32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deane, G.D. 1990. “Mobility and Adjustments: Paths to the Resolution of Residential Stress.” Demography 27:65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan, G.L. and S. Newman. 1974. “People as Planners: The Fulfillment of Residential Mobility Expectations.” pp. 279–318 in Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress, Vol. 3, edited by G.J. Duncan and J.N. Morgan. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  21. Duzak, W. 1988. “Home Sales Downturn May Be Long Term.” The Tennessean, January 24, p. 4.Google Scholar
  22. Felson, M. 1978. “Invidious Distinctions among Cars, Clothes, and Suburbs.” Public Opinion Quarterly 42:49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fernandez, R.M. and J.E. Kulik. 1981. “A Multilevel Model of Life Satisfaction: Effects of Individual Characteristics and Neighborhood Composition.” American Sociological Review 46:840–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giles, M.W. and M.K. Dantico. 1982. “Political Participation and Neighborhood Social Context Revisited.” American Journal of Political Science 26:144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodman, J. 1974. “Local Residential Mobility and Family Housing Adjustments.” pp. 79–105 in Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress, Vol. 2, edited by L.N. Morgan. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  26. — 1978. Urban Residential Mobility: Places, People, and Policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Greenberg, M.R. and T.D. Boswell. 1972. “Neighborhood Deterioration as a Factor in Intraurban Migration: A Case Study in New York City.” Professional Geographer 24:11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenwood, M.J. 1985. “Human Migration: Theory, Models, and Empirical Studies.” Journal of Regional Science 25:521–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guest, A.M. and B.A. Lee. 1984. “How Urbanites Define Their Neighborhoods.” Population and Environment 7:32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hagan, D.E. and C.M. Collier. 1983. “Must Respondent Selection Procedures for Telephone Surveys Be Invasive?” Public Opinion Quarterly 47:547–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haney, W.G. and E.S. Knowles. 1978. “Perceptions of Neighborhoods by City and Suburban Residents.” Human Ecology 6:201–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hogan, D.P. and E.M. Kitagawa. 1985. “The Impact of Social Status, Family Structure, and Neighborhood on the Fertility of Black Adolescents.” American Journal of Sociology 90:825–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huckfeldt, R. 1986. Politics in Context: Assimilation and Conflict in Urban Neighborhoods. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  34. Hunter, A. 1974. Symbolic Communities: The Persistence and Change of Chicago’s Local Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jencks, C. and S.E. Mayer. 1990. “The Social Consequences of Growing Up in a Poor Neighborhood.” pp. 111–86 in Inner-City Poverty in the United States, edited by L.E. Lynn Jr. and M.G.H. McGeary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  36. Landale, N.S. and A.M. Guest. 1985. “Constraints, Satisfaction, and Residential Mobility: Speare’s Model Reconsidered.” Demography 22:199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, B.A. 1978. “Residential Mobility on Skid Row: Disaffiliation, Powerlessness, and Decision Making.” Demography 22:199–222.Google Scholar
  38. — 1981. “The Urban Unease Revisited: Perceptions of Local Safety and Neighborhood Satisfaction among Metropolitan Residents.” Social Science Quarterly 62:611–29.Google Scholar
  39. — 1987. Urban Growth and the Quality of Life: Findings from a Survey of Nashville Residents. Nashville: Metropolitan Planning Commission of Nashville-Davidson County.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, B.A. and K.E. Campbell. 1990. “Common Ground? Urban Neighborhoods as Survey Respondents See Them.” Paper presented at annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  41. Lee, T. 1968. “Urban Neighborhood as a Socio-Spatial Schema.” Human Relations 21: 241–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leslie, G.R. and A.H. Richardson. 1961. “Life-Cycle, Career Pattern, and the Decision to Move.” American Sociological Review 26:894–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lichter, D.T. and G.F. Dejong. 1990. “The United States.” pp. 391–417 in International Handbook on Internal Migration, edited by C.B. Nam, W.J. Serow, and D.F. Sly. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  44. Logan, J.R. and O.A. Collver. 1983. “Residents’ Perceptions of Suburban Community Differences.” American Sociological Review 48:428–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Logan, J.R. and H.L. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Long, L. 1988. Migration and Residential Mobility in the United States. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  47. McHugh, K., P. Gober, and N. Reid. 1990. “Determinants of Short- and Long-Term Mobility Expectations for Home Owners and Renters.” Demography 27:81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Metropolitan Planning Commission. 1985. Preliminary Population. Employment, and Housing Forecasts to 2010: Nashville and the Metropolitan Area. Nashville: Research Division, Metropolitan Planning Commission of Nashville-Davidson County.Google Scholar
  49. Michelson, W. 1977. Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. — 1980. “Residential Mobility and Urban Policy: Some Sociological Considerations.” pp. 79–99 in Residential Mobility and Public Policy, edited by W.A.V. Clark and E.G. Moore. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Moore, E.G. 1986. “Mobility Intention and Subsequent Relocation.” Urban Geography 7: 497–514.Google Scholar
  52. Moore, E.G. and W.A.V. Clark. 1986. “Stable Structure and Local Variation: A Comparison of Household Flows in Four Metropolitan Areas.” Urban Studies 23:185–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mosher, W.D. and J.W. McNally. 1991. “Contraceptive Use at First Premarital Intercourse.” Family Planning Perspectives 23:108–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Newman, S.J. and G.J. Duncan. 1979. “Residential Problems, Dissatisfaction, and Mobility.” Journal of the American Planning Association 45:154–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oropesa, R.S. 1989. “Neighborhood Associations, Political Repertoires, and Neighborhood Exits.” Sociological Perspectives 32:435–52.Google Scholar
  56. Parcel, T.L. and C.W. Mueller. 1983. Ascription and Labor Markets: Race and Sex Differences in Earnings. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  57. Quigley, J.M. and D.H. Weinberg. 1977. “Intra-Urban Residential Mobility: A Review and Synthesis.” International Regional Science Review 2:41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rossi, P.H. 1955. Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Sabagh, G., M.D. Van Arsdol Jr., and E.W. Butler. 1969. “Some Determinants of Intrametropolitan Residential Mobility: Conceptual Considerations.” Social Forces 48:88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Semyonov, M. 1981. “Effects of Community on Status Attainment.” Sociological Quarterly 22:359–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Semyonov, M. and V. Kraus. 1982. “The Social Hierarchies of Communities and Neighborhoods.” Social Science Quarterly 63:780–89.Google Scholar
  62. Shefer, D. and N. Promo. 1985. “The Determinants of Household Migration Into and Out of Distressed Neighborhoods.” Urban Studies 22:339–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simmons, A.B. 1985. “Recent Studies on Place Utility and Intention to Migrate: An International Comparison.” Population and Environment 8:120–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Skogan, W.G. 1990. Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, D.A. and G.R. Jarjoura. 1989. “Household Characteristics, Neighborhood Composition, and Victimization Risk.” Social Forces 68:621–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. South, S.J. and G.D. Deane. 1993. “Race and Residential Mobility: Individual Determinants and Structural Constraints.” Social Forces 72:147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Speare, A., Jr. 1974. “Residential Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility.” Demography 11:173–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Speare, A., Jr., S. Goldstein, and W.H. Frey. 1975. Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  69. Stouffer, S.A. 1940. “Intervening Opportunities: A Theory Relating Mobility and Distance.” American Sociological Review 5:845–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taub, R.P., D.G. Taylor, and J.D. Dunham. 1984. Paths of Neighborhood Change: Race and Crime in Urban America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. White, M.J. 1987. American Neighborhoods and Residential Differentiation. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Whitney, V.H. and C.M. Grigg. 1958. “Patterns of Mobility among a Group of Families of College Students.” American Sociological Review 23:643–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wolpert, J. 1966. “Migration as an Adjustment to Environmental Stress.” Journal of Social Issues 22:92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zimmer, B.G. 1973. “Residential Mobility and Housing.” Land Economics 49:344–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barrett A. Lee
    • 1
  • R. S. Oropesa
    • 1
  • James W. Kanan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Population Research InstituteThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations