Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 653–681 | Cite as

A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption

  • Lee A. Lillard
  • Linda J. Waite
Families and Households

Abstract

Married couples with children appear to be less likely to end their marriages than childless couples, especially when the children are young. Although this suggests that children affect the chances that their parents will divorce, the process may not be so simple: the chances that the marriage will last also may affect couples’ willingness to make the commitment to the marriage implied by having children. This paper uses data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) to test the hypothesis that the risk of disruption faced by a married woman affects the chances that she will conceive and bear a child. The model used takes into account the simultaneous relationships between marital dissolution and marital fertility by including the hazard of disruption as a predictor of timing and likelihood of marital conception, and by including the results of previous fertility decisions as predictors of disruption of the marriage. We find that the hazard of disruption has strong negative effects on the hazard of marital childbearing, lengthening the intervals between births and decreasing the chances that a child will be born. This effect appears to be strongest for women who have had at least one child, either before or during the current marriage, although it is also large for childless women. Explicitly including the hazard of disruption in models of marital childbearing has sizable and important effects on many predictors of fertility.

Keywords

Birth Interval Divorce Rate Marital Fertility Marital Dissolution Duration Dependence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, Gary S. 1986. A Treatise on the Family Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, Gary S., Elizabeth Landes, and Robert T. Michael. 1977. “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability.” Journal of Political Economy 85:1141–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Porath, Yoram. 1975. “First-Generation Effects on Second-Generation Fertility.” Demography 12:397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherlin, Andrew. 1977. “The Effect of Children on Marital Dissolution.” Demography 14:265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. —. 1978. “Remarriage as an Incomplete Institution.” American Journal of Sociology 84:634–5.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chester, Robert. 1974. “Is There a Relationship between Childlessness and Marriage Breakdown?” pp. 114–26 in Pronatalism: The Myth of Mom and Apple Pie, edited by E. Peck and J. Senderowitz. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Falaris, Evangelos M. 1987. “An Empirical Study of the Timing and Spacing of Childbearing.” Southern Economic Journal 54:287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glick, Paul C. and Arthur J. Norton. 1977. “Frequency, Duration, and Probability of Marriage and Divorce.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 33:307–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hannan, Michael T., Nancy Brandon Tuma, and Lyle P. Groeneveld. 1977. “Income and Marital Events: Evidence from an Income-Maintenance Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (6):1186–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacob, Herbert. 1988. The Silent Revolution: The Transformation of Divorce Law in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Koo, Helen P. and Barbara K. Janowitz. 1983. “Interrelationships between Fertility and Marital Dissolution: Results of a Simultaneous Logit Model.” Demography 20:129–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lillard, Lee A. 1993. “Simultaneous Equations for Hazards.” Journal of Econometrics 56:189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lillard, Lee A. and Linda J. Waite. 1990. “Panel Versus Retrospective Data on Marital Histories: Lessons from the PSID.” Individuals and Families in Transition: Understanding Change through Longitudinal Data. Edited by H. V. Beaton, D. A. Ganni, and D. T. Frankel. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  14. McCarthy, James. 1979. “Religious Commitment, Affiliation, and Marriage Dissolution.” Pp. 179–97 in The Religious Dimension: New Directions in Quantitative Research, edited by Robert Wuthnow. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Michael, Robert T. and Nancy Brandon Tuma. 1985. “Entry into Marriage and Parenthood by Young Men and Women: The Influence of Family Background.” Demography 22:515–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morgan, S. Philip and Ronald R. Rindfuss. 1985. “Marital Disruption: Structural and Temporal Dimensions.” American Journal of Sociology 90:1055–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mott, Frank L. and Sylvia F. Moore. 1979. “The Causes of Marital Disruption among Young American Women: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 41 (2):355–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakada, Michael and Michael P. Ward. 1982. “A Dynamic Model of Marital Dissolution: A Note.” Paper presented at the meetings of the Population Association of America, San Diego.Google Scholar
  19. Peters, H. Elizabeth. 1986. “Marriage and Divorce: Informational Constraints and Private Contracting.” American Economic Review 76:437–54.Google Scholar
  20. Rindfuss, Ronald R., S. P. Morgan, and C. Gray Swicegood. 1984. “The Transitions to Motherhood: The Intersection of Structural and Temporal Dimensions.” American Sociological Review 45:431–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. —. 1988. First Births in America: Changes in the Timing of Parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Schoen, Robert. 1975. “California Divorce Rates by Age at First Marriage and Duration of First Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 37:548–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seiver, Daniel A. 1978. “Which Couples at Given Parities Have Additional Births.” Pp. 309–19 in Research in Population Economics. Vol. 1, edited by Julian Simon. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  24. South, Scott J. and Glenna Spitze. 1986. “Determinants of Divorce over the Marital Life Course.” American Sociological Review 51:583–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Teachman, Jay D. and Karen Polonko. 1985. “Timing of the Transition to Parenthood: A Multidimensional Birth-Interval Approach.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 47:867–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Udry, J. Richard. 1983. “Do Couples Make Fertility Plans One Birth at a Time?” Demography 20:117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waite, Linda J., Gus W. Haggstrom, and David E. Kanouse. 1985. “Parenthood and Marital Stability.” American Sociological Review 50:850–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Waite, Linda J. and Lee A. Lillard. 1991. “Children and Marital Disruption.” American Journal of Sociology 96:930–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Willis, Robert J. 1974. “Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior.” pp. 25–75 in Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital, edited by Theodore W. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee A. Lillard
    • 1
  • Linda J. Waite
    • 2
  1. 1.The RAND CorporationSanta Monica
  2. 2.Population Research CenterNORC and the University of ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations