A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption
- 182 Downloads
Married couples with children appear to be less likely to end their marriages than childless couples, especially when the children are young. Although this suggests that children affect the chances that their parents will divorce, the process may not be so simple: the chances that the marriage will last also may affect couples’ willingness to make the commitment to the marriage implied by having children. This paper uses data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) to test the hypothesis that the risk of disruption faced by a married woman affects the chances that she will conceive and bear a child. The model used takes into account the simultaneous relationships between marital dissolution and marital fertility by including the hazard of disruption as a predictor of timing and likelihood of marital conception, and by including the results of previous fertility decisions as predictors of disruption of the marriage. We find that the hazard of disruption has strong negative effects on the hazard of marital childbearing, lengthening the intervals between births and decreasing the chances that a child will be born. This effect appears to be strongest for women who have had at least one child, either before or during the current marriage, although it is also large for childless women. Explicitly including the hazard of disruption in models of marital childbearing has sizable and important effects on many predictors of fertility.
KeywordsBirth Interval Divorce Rate Marital Fertility Marital Dissolution Duration Dependence
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Becker, Gary S. 1986. A Treatise on the Family Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Chester, Robert. 1974. “Is There a Relationship between Childlessness and Marriage Breakdown?” pp. 114–26 in Pronatalism: The Myth of Mom and Apple Pie, edited by E. Peck and J. Senderowitz. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Jacob, Herbert. 1988. The Silent Revolution: The Transformation of Divorce Law in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Lillard, Lee A. and Linda J. Waite. 1990. “Panel Versus Retrospective Data on Marital Histories: Lessons from the PSID.” Individuals and Families in Transition: Understanding Change through Longitudinal Data. Edited by H. V. Beaton, D. A. Ganni, and D. T. Frankel. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, James. 1979. “Religious Commitment, Affiliation, and Marriage Dissolution.” Pp. 179–97 in The Religious Dimension: New Directions in Quantitative Research, edited by Robert Wuthnow. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Nakada, Michael and Michael P. Ward. 1982. “A Dynamic Model of Marital Dissolution: A Note.” Paper presented at the meetings of the Population Association of America, San Diego.Google Scholar
- Peters, H. Elizabeth. 1986. “Marriage and Divorce: Informational Constraints and Private Contracting.” American Economic Review 76:437–54.Google Scholar
- —. 1988. First Births in America: Changes in the Timing of Parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Seiver, Daniel A. 1978. “Which Couples at Given Parities Have Additional Births.” Pp. 309–19 in Research in Population Economics. Vol. 1, edited by Julian Simon. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
- Willis, Robert J. 1974. “Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior.” pp. 25–75 in Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital, edited by Theodore W. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar