, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 575–584 | Cite as

Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: A research note

  • Nan Marie Astone
  • Sara S. McLanahan
Migration and Adjustment


This paper examines the hypothesis that high levels of residential mobility among nonintact families account for part of the well-known association between living in a nonintact family and dropping out of high school. Children from single-parent families and stepfamilies are more likely than children from two-parent families to move during the school year. As much as 30% of the difference in the risk of dropping out between children from stepfamilies and children from intact families can be explained by differences in residential mobility. Previously, mechanisms explaining school failure on the part of children in nonintact families were more plausible for children in single-parent families than for children in stepfamilies; high levels of residential mobility apply to both groups of children. In addition, residential mobility lends itself to manipulation by public policy, with potentially remedial effects for vulnerable children. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 1990 meetings of the American Sociological Association, held in Washington DC, and at the 1991 meetings of the Eastern Sociological Society held in Providence. We are grateful to Andrew Cherlin, Melvin Kohn, Gary Sandefur, and several anonymous referees for their valuable comments, to Robert Davis for his computational assistance, and to Tobey H. Sohn and Teresa A. Withers for secretarial help. Support to the senior author was provided by the National Institute on Aging under Grant HD 19375-03 and by the W.T. Grant Faculty Scholars Award. Support for computing facilities was provided by a grant to the Hopkins Population Center (PD30 H006268-19). 1994 Population Association of America


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astone, N.M. and S.S. McLanahan. 1991. “Family Structure, Parental Practices and High School Completion.” American Sociological Review 56:309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cameron, S.V. and J.J. Heckman. 1993. “The Nonequivalence of High School Equivalents.” Journal of Labor Economics II:1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman, J.S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94:S94-S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haveman, R., B.L. Wolfe, and J. Spaulding. 1991. “Educational Achievement and Childhood Events and Circumstances.” Demography 28:133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Krein, S.F. and A.H. Beller. 1988. “Educational Attainment of Children from Single-Parent Families: Differences by Exposure, Gender and Race.” Demography 25:221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Long, L. 1992. “International Perspectives on the Residential Mobility of America’s Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54:861–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Manski, C.F., G.D. Sandefur, S.S. McLanahan, and D. Powers. 1992. “Alternative Estimates of the Effects of Family Structure during Childhood on High School Graduation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McLanahan, S.S. 1983. “Family Structure and Stress: A Longitudinal Comparison of Male and Female-Headed Families.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 45:347–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McLanahan, S.S. 1985. “Family Structure and the Intergenerational Transmission of Poverty.” American Journal of Sociology 90:873–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McLanahan, S.S. and G.D. Sandefur. 1994. Growing Up with a Single Parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Robbins, P.K. and K.P. Dickenson. 1985. “Child Support and Welfare Dependence: A Multinomial Logit Analysis.” Demography 22:367–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sandefur, G.D., S.S. McLanahan, and R.A. Wojtkiewicz. 1993. “The Effects of Parental Marital Status during Adolescence on High School Graduation.” Social Forces 71:103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Speare, A., Jr. and F.K. Goldscheider. 1987. “Effects of Marital Status Change on Residential Mobility.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:455–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomson, E., T. L. Hanson, and S.S. McLanahan. Forthcoming. “Family Structure and Child Well-Being: Economic Resources versus Parental Socialization.” Social Forces.Google Scholar
  16. Winship, C. and R.D. Mare. 1992. “Models for Sample Selection Bias.” Annual Review of Sociology 18:327–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wojtkiewicz, R.A. 1993. “Simplicity and Complexity in the Effects of Family Structure on High School Graduation.” Demography 30:701–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nan Marie Astone
    • 1
  • Sara S. McLanahan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Population DynamicsJohns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public HealthBaltimore
  2. 2.Office of Population ResearchPrinceton UniversityPrinceton

Personalised recommendations