Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 455–468 | Cite as

Geographic mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints

  • Kimberlee A. ShaumanEmail author
  • Yu Xie
Determinants and Consequences of Migration

Abstract

Women scientists are much more likely than men scientists to be in two-career marriages. This study examines the argument that the higher prevalence of two-career marriages among women scientists presents a significant impediment to their geographic mobility. Three hypotheses are developed and tested. First. scientists in two-career families are less likely to migrate than scientists in one-career families. Second, the effect of two-career marriages on the probability of migration differs with gender; women are affected more negatively. Third, the effect of children on the probability of migration differs with gender; women are affected more negatively. The empirical work uses a data set of doctoral scientists extracted from the 5% Public Use Microdata Sample from the 1990 census. The first two hypotheses are not confirmed by the empirical results. but we find evidence supporting the third. Family constraints on women scientists’ careers generally appear to be weak. but become acute when they have children.

Keywords

Family Migration Geographic Mobility Female Scientist Woman Scientist Academic Woman 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahem, N.C. and E.L. Scott. 1981. Career Outcomes in a Matched Sample ofMen and WomenPh.D.s: An Analytical Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akin, K. and Y. Xie. 1995. “Migration of Scientists: Roles of Gender and the Family.” Research Report 95-350, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  3. Astone, N.M. and S.S. McLanahan. 1994. “Family Structure, Residential Mobility, and School Dropout: A Research Note.” Demography 31:575–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayer, A.E. and H.S. Astin. 1975. “Sex Differentials in the Academic Reward System.” Science 188:796–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird, G.A. and G.W Bird. 1985. “Determinants of Mobility in Two-Earner Families: Does the Wife’s Income Count?” Journal of Marriage and the Family 47:753–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, F.D. 1984. “Occupational Segregation and Labor Market Discrimination.” Pp. 117–43 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies, edited by B.F. Reskin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, J.R. 1979. Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, 1.R. and H. Zuckerman. 1987. “Marriage, Motherhood and Research Performance in Science.” Scientific American 25: 119–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, J.S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capita1.” American Journal of Sociology 94:S94-S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DaVanzo, J. 1977. Why Families Move: A Model ofthe Geographic Mobility of Married Couples. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. Duncan, R.P. and c.c. Perrucci. 1976. “Dual Occupation Families and Migration.” American Sociological Review 41:252–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epstein, C.F. 1974. “Reconciliation of Women’s Roles.” Pp. 47–389 in The Family: Its Structures and Functions, edited by R.L. Coser. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  13. Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, M. Neuschatz, and B. Uzzi. 1994. “Barriers to Women’s Participation in Academic Science and Engineering.” Pp. 43–67 in Who Will Do Science? Educating the Next Generation, edited by W. Pearson Jr. and A. Fechter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fox, M.F. 1995. “Women and Scientific Careers.” Pp. 205–23 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Peterson, and T. Pinch. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Frank, R.H. 1978. “Family Location Constraints and the Geographic Distribution of Female Professionals.” Journal of Political Economy 86: 117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hargens, L.L., J.C. McCann, and B.F. Reskin. 1978. “Productivity and Reproductivity: Fertility and Professional Achievement among Research Scientists.” Social Forces 57:154–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haveman, R., B. Wolfe, and J. Spaulding. 1991. “Childhood Events and Circumstances Influencing High School Completion.” Demography 28: 133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hertz, R. 1986. More Equal Than Others: Women and Men in Dual-Career Marriages. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ladinsky, 1. 1967. “Occupational Determinants of Geographic Mobility among Professional Workers.” American Sociological Review 32:253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lichter, D.T. 1980. “Household Migration and the Labor Market Position of Married Women.” Social Science Research 9:83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. — 1982. “The Migration of Dual-Worker Families: Does the Wife’s Job Matter?” Social Science Quarterly 63:48–57.Google Scholar
  22. Long, J.S., P.O. Allison, and R. McGinnis. 1993. “Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity.” American Sociological Review 58:703–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Long, J.S. and M.F. Fox. 1995. “Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism.” Annual Review of Sociology 21:45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Long, L.H. 1972. “The Influence of Number and Ages of Children on Residential Mobility.” Demography 9:371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. — 1974. “Women’s Labor Force Participation and the Residential Mobility of Families.” Social Forces 52:343–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. — 1988. Migration and Residential Mobility in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Maret, E. and B. Finlay. 1984. “The Distribution of Household Labor among Women in Dual-Earner Families.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 46:357–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marini, M.M. 1989. “Sex Differences in Earnings in the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology 15:343–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markham, W.T. and J.H. PIeckl. 1986. “Sex and Willingness to Move for Occupational Advancement: Some National Sample Results.” Sociological Quarterly 27:121–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marwell, G., R.A. Rosenfeld, and S. Spilerman. 1979. “Geographic Constraints on Women’s Careers in Academia.” Science 205: 1225–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mincer, J. 1978. “Family Migration Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy 86:749–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peek, C.W, IV. 1995. “Sources of Gender and Race/Ethnic Stratification in Non-Academic Science and Engineering.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  33. Polachek, S.W. 1981. “Occupational Self-Selection: A Human Capital Approach to Sex Differences in Occupational Structure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 63:60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reskin, B.F., ed. 1984. Sex Segregation in the Workplace. Wash-ington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rosenfeld, R.A. 1991. “Outcomes Analysis of Academic Careers.” Review prepared for the Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, National Research Council.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenfeld, R.A. and J.A. Jones. 1987. “Patterns and Effects of Geographic Mobility for Academic Women and Men.” Journal of Higher Education 58:493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sandefur, G.D. 1985. “Variations in Interstate Migration of Men across the Early Stages of the Life Cycle.” Demography 22:353–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shihadeh, E.S. 1991. “The Prevalence of Husband-Centered Migration: Employment Consequences for Married Mothers.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:432–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sonnert, G. and G. Holton. 1996. “Career Patterns of Women and Men in the Sciences.” American Scientist 84:63–71.Google Scholar
  40. Sorensen, A. 1983. “Children and their Mother’s Career.” Social Science Research 12:26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Speare, A., Jr. 1970. “Home Ownership, Life Cycle Stage, and Residential Mobility.” Demography 7:449–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Speare, A., Jr. and F.K. Goldscheider. 1987. “Effects of Marital Sta-tus Change on Residential Mobility.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:455–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Speare, A., Jr., S. Goldstein, and W.H. Frey. 1975. Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  44. Spenner, K.I. and R.A. Rosenfeld. 1990. “Women, Work, and Identities.” Social Science Research 19:266–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stockard, J. and M.M. Johnson. 1980. Sex Roles: Sex Inequality and Sex Role Development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  46. Turner, R.H. 1964. “Some Aspects of Women’s Ambition.” American Journal of Sociology 70:271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xie, Y. 1989. “The Process of Becoming a Scientist.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  48. Xie, Y. and K. Akin. 1994. “Sex Differences in Research Productivity.” Research Report 94-322, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  49. Zuckerman, H. 1991. “The Careers of Men and Women Scientists: A Review of Current Research.” Pp. 27–56 in The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, edited by H. Zuckerman, J.R. Cole, and J.T. Bruer. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Population Studies Center and Department of SociologyUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations