Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 277–290 | Cite as

Education and the changing age pattern of American fertility: 1963–1989

  • Ronald R. RindfussEmail author
  • S. Philip Morgan
  • Kate Offutt
Fertility and Contraception

Abstract

Using pooled data from the 1980, 1985, and 1990 Current Population Surveys, we describe fertility trends by age and education for the period 1963–1989. Interest focuses on whether the effects of education have changed across this period. We show that women with college degrees experienced dramatic shifts toward later ages of childbearing. This shift is consistent with arguments we develop about the increased opportunity for women to pursue careers and about changes in the availability of child care

Keywords

Total Fertility Rate Current Population Survey Development Review Vital Registration Current Population Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bean, F.D. and M. Tienda. 1987. The Hispanic Population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bianchi, S.M. and D. Spain. 1986. American Women in Transition. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, J. 1972. “Coercive Pronatalism and American Population Policy.” Pp. 81–109 in Aspects of Population Growth, edited by R. Parke and C.F. Westoff. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, F. and M.A. Ferber. 1986. The Economics of Women, Men and Work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bumpass, L.L. 1973. “Is Low Fertility Here to Stay?” Family Planning Perspectives 5:67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bumpass, L.L, J.A. Sweet, and A.J. Cherlin. 1991. “The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:913–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bumpass, L.L. and J.A. Sweet. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.” Demography 26:615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, R. and S.P. Morgan. 1991. “Recent Trends in the Timing of First Births in the United States.” Demography 28:513–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheriin, A.J. 1992. Marriage, Divorce and Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, K. and P. van den Oever. 1982. “Demographic Foundations of New Sex Roles.” Population and Development Review 8:495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. England, P. and G. Farkas. 1986. Households, Employment and Gender: A Social, Economic and Demographic View. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  12. Goldin, C. 1992. “The Meaning of College in the Lives of American Women: The Past One-Hundred Years.” Working Paper 4099, National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  13. Hochschild, A. 1989. The Second Shift. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, J. 1989. Revolving Doors. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobsen, J.P. 1994. The Economics of Gender. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Johansen, A.S., A. Leibowitz, and L.J. Waite. 1994. “Parents’ Demand for Child Care.” Working Paper 94-13, RAND Labor and Population. Santa Monica: RAND.Google Scholar
  17. Karoly, L.A. 1996. “Anatomy of the U.S. Income Distribution Two Decades of Change.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12:7796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, C. and S. Ventura. 1990. “Birth and Fertility Rates by Education: 1980 and 1985.” Vital and Health Statistics 21(49), Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  19. Mare, R. 1995a. “Demography and the Evolution of Educational Inequality.” CDE Working Paper 95-10. Madison: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  20. — 1995b. “Changes in Educational Attainment and School Enrollment.” Pp. 155–213 in The State of the Union: America in the I990s, edited by R. Farley. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Mare, R.D. and M. Tzeng. 1989. “Fathers’ Ages and the Social Stratification of Sons.” American Journal of Sociology 95: 108–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marini, M.M. 1978. “The Transition to Adulthood: Sex Differences in Educational Attainment and Age at Marriage.“ American Sociological Review 43:483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Monnier, A. and C. de Guibert-Lantoine. 1993. “The Demographic Situation of Europe and the Developed Countries Overseas: An Annual Report.” Population: An English Selection 5:249–72.Google Scholar
  24. Morgan, S.P. 1991. “Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Childlessness in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 97:779–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morgan, S. P. Forthcoming. “Characteristic Features of Modem American Fertility: A Description of Late Twentieth Century U.S. Fer-tility Trends and Differentials.” Population and Development Review (Supplement).Google Scholar
  26. Morgan, S.P., N. Botev, R. Chen, and J. Huang. 1994. “White and Nonwhite Trends in Fertility Timing: Comparisons Using Vital Registration and Current Population Surveys.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Miami.Google Scholar
  27. Oppenheimer, Y.K. 1994. “Women’s Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial Societies.” Population and Development Review 20:293–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pagnini, D.L. and R.R. Rindfuss. 1993. “The Divorce of Marriage and Childbearing: Changing Attitudes and Behavior in the United States.” Population and Development Review 19:331–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parnell, A.M., G. Swicegood, and G. Stevens. 1994. “Nonmarital Pregnancies and Marriage in the United States.” Social Forces 73:263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raftery, A.E. 1986. “Choosing Models for Cross-Classifications.” America Sociological Review 51: 145–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. — 1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.” Sociological Methodology 25: 111–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reskin, B. and P. Roos. 1990. Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Womens Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rindfuss, R.R. 1991. “The Young Adult Years: Diversity, Structural Change and Fertility.” Demography 28:493–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rindfuss, R.R., K.L. Brewster, and A.A. Kavee. 1994. “Women, Work, and Children: Behavioral and Ideational Change in the United States.” Presented at the International Union of the Scientific Study of Population Conference: “Seminar on Values and Fertility Change,” Sion, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  35. Rindfuss, R.R., L.L. Bumpass, and C. St. John. 1980. “Education and Fertility: Implications for the Roles Women Occupy.” American Sociological Review 45:431–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rindfuss, R.R., S.P. Morgan, and G. Swicegood. 1988. First Births in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rindfuss, R.R. and A. Parnell. 1989. “The Varying Connection Between Marital Status and Childbearing in the United States.” Population and Development Review 15:447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rindfuss, R.R. and J.A. Sweet. 1977. Postwar Fertility Trends and Differentials in the United States. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rindfuss, R.R. and A. van den Heuvel, 1990. “Cohabitation: A Precursor to Marriage or an Alternative to Being Single?” Population and Development Review 16:703–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenfeld, R.A. 1994. “Women’s Work Histories.” Prepared for the workshop “Expanding Frameworks for Fertility Research in Industrialized Countries,” Woods Hole, MA.Google Scholar
  41. Ryder, N.B. 1973. “Recent Trends and Group Differences in Fertility.” Pp. 57–68 in Toward the End of Growth: Population in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, H.L., S.P. Morgan, and T. Koropeckyj-Cox. 1996. “A Decomposition of Trends in the Nonmarital Fertility Ratios of Blacks and Whites in the United States, 1960-1992.” Demography 33:141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swicegood, C.G., S.P. Morgan, and R.R. Rindfuss. 1984. “Measurement and Replication: Evaluating the Consistency of Eight U.S. Fertility Surveys.” Demography 21:19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thornton, A. 1989. “Changing Attitudes Toward Family Issues in the United States.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:873–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Upchurch, D.M., J. McCarthy, and L.R. Ferguson. 1993. “Childbearing and Schooling: Disentangling Temporal and Causal Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review 58:738–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1982. Trends in Childcare Arrangements of Working Mothers. Current Population Reports, Series P-23, No. 117. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  47. —. 1992a. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  48. —. 1992b. Who s Minding the Kids? Childcare Arrangements: Fall 1988. Current Population Reports, Series P-70, No. 30. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  49. —. 1992c. Educational Attainment in the U.S., March 1991 and 1992. Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 462. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  50. Westoff, C.F. 1978. “Marriage and Fertility in Developed Countries.” Scientific American 239:51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilkie, J.R. 1981. “The Trend Toward Delayed Parenthood.“ Journal of Marriage and the Family 43:583–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald R. Rindfuss
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Philip Morgan
    • 2
  • Kate Offutt
    • 2
  1. 1.Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North Carolina, CB# 8120 University SquareChapel Hill
  2. 2.Population Studies CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations