Demography

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 459–479

Five decades of missing females in China

Mortality, Race, and the Family

Abstract

This paper seeks to explain the dearth of females in the population of China in cohorts born from the late 1930s to the present. We demonstrate that in virtually all cohorts. the shortage of females in comparison with males is revealed when the cohort is first enumerated in a census. Subsequently it barely changes, an indication that female losses occur very early in life. Using the high-quality data from the censuses and fertility surveys in China, we show that many of the births of the girls missing in the censuses were not reported in the surveys because they died very young. The incidence of excess early female mortality (probably infanticide) declined precipitously in the Communist period, but not to zero. The recent escalation in the proportion of young females missing in China has been caused largely by rapidly escalating sex-selective abortion.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coale, A.J. 1984. “Rapid Population Change in China, 1952–1982.” Report No. 27, National Research Council, Committee on Population and Demography.Google Scholar
  2. Coale, A.J. 1993. “Mortality Schedules in China Derived from Data in the 1982 and 1990 Censuses.” Working Paper 93-7, Office of Population Research.Google Scholar
  3. Coale, A.J. and P. Demeny. 1983. Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations. 2nd Ed., New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Coale, A.J. and S. Li. 1991. “The Effect of Age Misreporting in China on the Calculation of Mortality Rates at Very High Ages.” Demography 28:293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Japan. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 1991. Vital Statistics of Japan, 1991. Vol. 1. Tokyo: Statistics and Information Department.Google Scholar
  6. Johanssen, S. and O. Nygren. 1991. “The Missing Girls in China: A New Demographic Account.” Population and Development Review 17(1):35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lavely, W.R. 1986. “Age Patterns of Chinese Marital Fertility, 1950-1981.” Demography 23:419–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Muhuri, P.K. and S.H. Preston. 1991. “Effects of Family Composition on Mortality Differentials by Sex Among Children in Matlab, Bangladesh.” Population and Development Review 17(3):415–34,564–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Republic of Korea. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). 1988. Recent Changes in Vital Statistics and New Population Projection. Seoul: National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  10. Shim, Y.H., S.M. Park, H.S. Kim, and W.S. Pack. 1991. An Empirical Study on Abortion in Korea (in Korean with English abstract). Seoul: Korean Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  11. State Family Planning Commission of China (SFPC). 1990. Data of China Fertility and Contraception Survey (Whole Country) (in Chinese). Beijing: China Population Press.Google Scholar
  12. State Statistical Bureau of China (SSB). 1991. 10 Percent Sampling Tabulation on the 1990 Population Census of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese). Beijing: China Statistical Press.Google Scholar
  13. Teitelbaum, M.S., N. Mantel, and C.R. Stark. 1971. “Limited Dependence of the Human Sex Ratio on Birth Order.” American Journal of Human Genetics 23(3):271–280.Google Scholar
  14. Wolf, A.P. and C. Huang. 1980. Marriages and Adoption in China, 1845–1945. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Yi, Z., P. Tu, B. Gu, Y. Xu, B. Li, and Y. Li. 1992. “An Analysis of the Causes and Implications of the Recent Increase in the Sex Ratio at Birth in China.” Presented at the International Seminar on China’s 1990 Population Census, Beijing.Google Scholar
  16. Yi, Z., P. Tu, B. Gu, Y. Xu, B. Li, and Y. Li. 1993. “Causes and Implications of the Recent Increase in the Reported Sex Ratio at Birth in China.” Population and Development Review 19(2):283–302, 425,427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office of Population ResearchPrinceton UniversityPrinceton
  2. 2.Center for International ResearchBureau of the CensusWashington

Personalised recommendations