, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 215–226 | Cite as

Taxes and the Family: The impact of the tax exemption for dependents on marital fertility

  • Leslie A. Whittington
U.S. Fertility


In this paper I use data from the Panel Study on Income Dynamics to examine the relationship between the dependent exemption feature of the United States federal income tax (an unambiguous subsidy to dependents) and the fertility behavior of married couples over the period 1979–1983. The exemption decreases the price of a child to a household, thus having a direct relationship to the timing and/or number of children observed in a family. Conditional logit results support this hypothesis by showing that the exemption has a positive and significant impact on the likelihood of having a birth during the period under study.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aaron, Henry J. and Joseph A. Pechman (eds.). 1981. How Taxes Affect Economic Behavior. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  2. Averett, Susan L. 1991. “Child Care Costs and Female Labor Supply: An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of the Child Care Tax Credit on Female Labor Supply and Demand for Child Care.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, Gary. 1960. “An Economic Analysis of Fertility.” Pp. 209–31 in Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, edited by Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, Gary S. and H. Gregg Lewis. 1976. “On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Pp. 195–204, in The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, edited by Gary S. Becker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becketti, Sean, William Gould, Lee Lillard, and Finis Welch. 1988. “The Panel Study of Income Dynamics after Fourteen Years: An Evaluation.” Journal of Labor Economics 6(4):472–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, David M. and Philip K. Robins. 1989. “Fertility, Employment and Child-Care Costs.” Demography 26(4):287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. —. 1991. “Child Care Demand and Labor Supply of Young Mothers over Time.” Demography 28(3):333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloom, David E. 1982. “What’s Happening to the Age at First Birth in the United States? A Study of Recent Cohorts.” Demography 19(3):351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borg, Mary O’Malley. 1989. “The Income-Fertility Relationship: Effect of the Net Price of a Child.” Demography 26(2):301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buttner, Thomas and Wolfgang Lutz. 1990. “Estimating Fertility Responses to Policy Measures in the German Democratic Republic.” Population and Development Review 16(1):539–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cain, Glen C. and Martin D. Dooley. 1976. “Estimation of a Model of Labor Supply, Fertility and Wages of Married Women.” Journal of Political Economy 84(4):S179–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chamberlain, Gary. 1980. “Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data.” Review of Economic Studies 47:225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clotfelter, C. T. and C. E. Steurle. 1981. “Charitable Contributions.” pp. 403–46 in How Taxes Affect Economic Behavior, edited by Henry J. Aaron and Joseph A. Pechman. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  14. Cogan, John. 1981. “Fixed Costs and Labor Supply.” Econometrica 49:945–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Espenshade, Thomas J. and Joseph J. Minarik. 1987. “Demographic Implications of the 1986 U.S. Tax Reform.” Population and Development Review 13:115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greene, William H. 1990. Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Hanoch, Giora. 1980. “A Multivariate Model of Labor Supply: Methodology and Estimation.” Pp. 249–326 in Female Labor Supply, edited by James P. Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Happel, S. K., J. K. Hill, and S. A. Low. 1984. “An Economic Analysis of the Timing of Childbirth.” Population Studies 38:299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hausman, Jerry A. and James Poterba. 1987. “Household Behavior and the Tax Reform Act of 1986.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1:110–19.Google Scholar
  20. Heckman, James. 1980. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error with an Application to the Estimation of Labor Supply Functions.” Pp. 206–48 in Female Labor Supply, edited by James P. Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heckman, James J., V. Joseph Hotz, and James R. Walker. 1985. “New Evidence on the Timing and Spacing of Births.” American Economic Review 75(2): 179–84.Google Scholar
  22. Kelly, Cindy. 1991. “Tax Changes May Spawn New Baby Boom.” The Margin 7 (Fall):50.Google Scholar
  23. Lindert, Peter H. 1978. Fertility and Scarcity in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Michael, Robert T. 1985. “Consequences of the Rise in Female Labor Force Participation Rates: Questions and Probes.” Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1):S117–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moynihan, Daniel P. 1986. Fertility and Nation: The God kin Lectures, Harvard University. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  26. Olsen, Randall J. and Kenneth I. Wolpin. 1983. “The Impact of Exogenous Child Mortality on Fertility: A Waiting Time Regression with Dynamic Regressors.” Econometrica 51 (3):731–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pitt, Mark M. and Mark R. Rosenzweig. 1990. “Estimating the Intrahousehold Incidence of Illness: Child Health and Gender-Inequality in the Allocation of Time.” International Economic Review 31(4):969–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schultz, T. Paul. 1973. “A Preliminary Survey of Economic Analyses of Fertility.” American Economic Review 63:71–87.Google Scholar
  29. —. 1981. Economics of Population. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. “That Sinking Feeling.” 1991. Newsweek. November 4. pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
  31. Whittington, Leslie. 1989. “Taxes and the Family: The Personal Exemption and Fertility in the United States.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  32. Whittington. Leslie, James Aim, and H. Elizabeth Peters. 1990. “The Personal Exemption and Fertility: Implicit Pronatalist Policy in the U.S.” American Economic Review 80(2):545–56.Google Scholar
  33. Willis, Robert J. 1974. “Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior.” Pp. 25–75 in Economics of the Family, edited by Theodore W. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie A. Whittington
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Consumer Economics and Center on Population, Gender and SociallnequalityUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations