Demography

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 617–628

Unintended consequences of Immigration Reform: Discrimination and hispanic employment

  • B. Lindsay Lowell
  • Jay Teachman
  • Zhongren Jing
Immigration

Abstract

The record-keeping requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act(IRCA), and fines for illegal employment, may induce employers to discriminate against foreign-appearing workers. The General Accounting Office (GAO) reported widespread IRCA-related discrimination but did not link reported discriminatory practices to discriminatory employment behavior. We analyze the GAO’s random survey and, controlling for selectivity effects, demonstrate that employers who report discriminatory practices actually employ fewer Hispanics. Although the measured reduction of Hispanic employment due to IRCA is fairly small, this finding parallels research alerting us to adverse consequences of a law that so far has achieved few of its intended effects.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashenfelter, O. and R. Oaxaca. 1987. “The Economics of Discrimination: Economists Enter the Courtroom.” American Economic Review 77:321–25.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, R. and H. Brill. 1991. “Impact of IRCA on the US Labor Market and Economy: Final Report to the US Department of Labor.” Working Paper 11, U.S. Department of Labor, Immigration Policy and Research.Google Scholar
  3. Bean, F.D., B. Edmonston, and J.S. Passel. 1990. Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bean, F.D., E.E. Telles, and B.L. Lowell. 1987. “Undocumented Migration to the United States: Perceptions and Evidence.” Population and Development Review 13:671–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, P.M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Calavita, K. 1990. “Employer Sanctions Violations: Toward a Dialectical Model of White-Collar Crime.” Law and Society Review 24:1041–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, D.T. and J.C. Stanley. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally Company.Google Scholar
  8. Cross, H., G. Kenney, J. Mell, and W. Zimmermann. 1990. Employer Hiring Practices: Differential Treatment of Hispanic and Anglo Job Seekers. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Donato, K.M., J. Durand, and D.S. Massey. 1992a. “Changing Conditions in the U.S. Labor Market: Effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.” Population Research and Policy Review 11:93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ——. 1992b. “Stemming the Tide? Assessing the Deterrent Effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act.” Demography 29:139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donato, K.M. and D.S. Massey. 1993. “Effect of the Immigration Reform and Control Act on the Wages of Mexican Migrants.” Social Science Quarterly 74:523–41.Google Scholar
  12. Federal Publications. 1992. “Round Two: Senate Subcommittee Continues Employer Sanctions Hearings.” Interpreter Releases 69:477–79.Google Scholar
  13. Fix, M. and P.T. Hill. 1990. Enforcing Employer Sanctions: Challenges and Strategies. Santa Monica: RAND; Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Fry, R., B.L. Lowell, and E. Haghighat. 1995. “The Impact of Employer Sanctions on Metropolitan Wage Rates.” Industrial Relations. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  15. GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). 1990. Immigration Reform: Employer Sanctions and the Question of Discrimination. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
  16. Greene, W.H. 1991. LIMDEP: User’s Manual and Reference Guide, Version 6.0. Castle Hill, Australia: Econometric Software.Google Scholar
  17. Lowell, B.L. and Z. Jing. 1994. “Reporting the Unreportable: Employers’ Estimates of Unauthorized Workers.” International Migration Review 28:427–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Papademetriou, D.G., R.L. Bach, D.A. Cobb-Clark, R.G. Kramer, B.L. Lowell, S.J. Smith, and M. Shea. 1991. Employer Sanctions and U.S. Labor Markets: First Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  20. Scheirer, M.A. and E.L. Rezmovic. 1983. “Measuring the Degree of Program Implementation: A Methodological Review.” Evaluation Review 7:599–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sorensen, E. and F.D. Bean. 1994. “The Immigration Reform and Control Act and the Wages of Mexican Origin Workers: Evidence from Current Population Surveys.” Social Science Quarterly 75:1–17.Google Scholar
  22. Task Force on IRCA-Related Discrimination. 1990. Report and Recommendations of the Task Force on IRCA-Related Discrimination. Report to Congress Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1324a(k). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Congress. 1986. “Immigration Reform and Control Act.” Public Law 99-603, November 6. U.S. Department of Labor. 1990. Geographic Profile of Employment and Unemployment, 1989. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  24. Woodrow, K.A. and J.S. Passel. 1990. “Post-IRCA Undocumented Immigration to the United States: An Assessment Based on the June 1988 CPS.” Pp. 33–76 in Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s, edited by Bean, F.D., B. Edmonston, and J.S. Passel. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Lindsay Lowell
    • 1
  • Jay Teachman
    • 2
  • Zhongren Jing
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Department of LaborUSA
  2. 2.Washington State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.University of MarylandUSA

Personalised recommendations