, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 385–404 | Cite as

Religion as a determinant of marital stability

  • Evelyn L. Lehrer
  • Carmel U. Chiswick
US Marriage Patterns


Using data from the 1987–1988 National Survey of Families and Households, this paper studies the role of the religious composition of unions as a determinant of marital stability. With the exceptions of Mormons and individuals with no religious identification, stability is found to be remarkably similar across the various types of homogamous unions. Consistent with the notion that religion is a complementary marital trait, interfaith unions have generally higher rates of dissolution than intrafaith unions. The destabilizing effect of out-marriage varies inversely with the similarity in beliefs and practices of the two religions as well as with the mutual tolerance embodied in their respective doctrines. The results also suggest that religious compatibility between spouses at the time of marriage has a large influence on marital stability, rivaling in magnitude that of age at marriage and, at least for Protestants and Catholics, dominating any adverse effects of differences in religious background.


Religious Affiliation Marital Satisfaction Marital Dissolution Marital Stability Protestant Denomination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bean, Frank and Linda Aiken. 1976. “Intermarriage and Unwanted Fertility in the United States,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 38(1):61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, Gary S. 1974. “A Theory of Marriage.” Pp. 299–344 in Economics of the Family, edited by T.W. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. — 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, Gary S., Elizabeth M. Landes, and Robert T. Michael. 1977. “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability.” Journal of Political Economy 85(6):1141–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billette, Andre. 1967. “Conversion and Consonance: A Sociology of White American Catholic Converts.” Review of Religious Research 8(2):100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, Francine D. and Adam J. Grossberg. 1992. “Maternal Labor Supply and Children’s Cognitive Development.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74:474–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bracher, Michael, Gigi Santow, and James Trussell. 1992. “Marital Dissolution in Australia.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Denver.Google Scholar
  8. Bumpass, Larry L. and James A. Sweet. 1972. “Differentials in Marital Stability: 1970.” American Sociological Review 37(6):754–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burchinal, Lee G. and Loren E. Chancellor. 1963. “Survival Rates among Religiously Homogamous and Interreligious Marriages.” Social Forces 41(4):353–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro-Martin, Teresa and Larry L. Bumpass. 1989. “Recent Trends in Marital Disruption.” Demography 26(1):37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiswick, Carmel U. and Evelyn L. Lehrer. 1990. “On Marriage-Specific Human Capital: Its Role as a Determinant of Remarriage.” Journal of Population Economics 3:193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —. 1991. “Religious Intermarriage: An Economic Perspective.” Contemporary Jewry 12:21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christensen, Harold T. and Kenneth E. Barber. 1967. “Interfaith versus Intrafaith Marriage in Indiana.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 29(3):461–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox, David R. 1972. “Regression Models and Life Tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B34:187–202.Google Scholar
  15. Desai, Sonalde, P. Lindsay Chase-Lansdale, and Robert T. Michael. 1989. “Mother or Market? Effects of Maternal Employment on the Intellectual Ability of 4-Year Old Children.” Demography 26(4):545–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foster, Lawrence. 1982. “Between Heaven and Earth.” Sunstone 7:7–15.Google Scholar
  17. Glenn, Norval D. 1982. “Interreligious Marriage in the United States: Patterns and Recent Trends.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 44:555–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana. 1993. On the Economics of Marriage: A Theory of Marriage, Labor and Divorce. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  19. Heaton, Tim B. 1984. “Religious Homogamy and Marital Satisfaction Reconsidered.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 46:729–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heaton, Tim B. and Edith L. Pratt. 1990. “The Effects of Religious Homogamy on Marital Satisfaction and Stability.” Journal of Family Issues 11(2): 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iannaccone, Laurence R. 1990. “Religious Practice: A Human Capital Approach.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 29(3):297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelley, Dean M. 1972. Why Conservative Churches Are Growing. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  23. Kobrin Goldscheider, Frances. 1986. “Family Patterns among the U.S. Yiddish-Mother-Tongue Subpopulation: 1970.” Pp. 172–83 in The Jewish Family: Myths and Reality, edited by Steven M. Cohen and Paula E. Hyman. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
  24. Lam, David 1988. “Marriage Markets and Assortative Mating with Household Public Goods.” Journal of Human Resources 23(4):462–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lehrer, Evelyn L. Forthcoming. “The Role of Marriage-Specific Human Capital as a Determinant of the Stability of First and Higher Order Marriages.” Research in Population Economics.Google Scholar
  26. Mayer, Egon and Amy Avgar. 1987. Conversion among the Intermarried: Choosing to Become Jewish. New York: American Jewish Committee.Google Scholar
  27. McCarthy, Justin. 1979. “Religious Commitment, Affiliation, and Marriage Dissolution.” Pp. 179–97 in The Religious Dimension: New Directions in Quantitative Research, edited by Robert Wuthnow. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. McLanahan, Sara and Larry Bumpass. 1988. “Intergenerational Consequences of Family Disruption.” American Journal of Sociology 94(1): 130–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Menken, Jane, James Trussell, Debra Stempel, and Ozer Babakol. 1981. “Proportional Hazards Life Table Models: An Illustrative Analysis of Socio-Demographic Influences on Marriage Dissolution in the United States.” Demography 18(2): 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Michael, Robert T. 1979. “Diterminants of Divorce.” Pp. 223–68 in Sociological Economics, edited by L. Levy-Garboua. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Mosher, William D., Linda B. Williams, and David P. Johnson. 1992. “Religion and Fertility in the United States: New Patterns.” Demography 29(2): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pope, H. and C.W. Mueller. 1976. “The Intergenerational Transmission of Marital Instability: Comparisons by Race and Sex.” Journal of Social Issues 32:49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schneider, Susan W. 1989. Intermarriage—The Challenge of Living with Differences between Christians and Jews. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schultz, T. Paul. 1991. “Economic Aspects of Marriage and Fertility in the U.S.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, James E. 1985. “A Familistic Religion in a Modern Society.” Pp. 273–98 in Contemporary Marriage, edited by Kingsley Davis in association with Amyra Grossbard-Shechtman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. Teachman, Jay D. 1986. “First and Second Marital Dissolution: A Decomposition Exercise for Whites and Blacks.” Sociological Quarterly 27(4):571–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tuma, Nancy B. and Robert Michael. 1986. “A Comparison of Statistical Models for Life Course Analysis with an Application to First Marriage.” Current Perspectives on Aging and the Life Cycle 2:107–46.Google Scholar
  38. Waite, inda J. and Lee A. Lillard. 1991. “Children and Martial Disruption.” American Journal of Socioloty 96(4):930–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. White, Lynn K. 1991. “Determinants of Divorce: A Review of Research in the Eighties.” Pp. 141–49 in Contemporary Families, edited by Alan Booth Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evelyn L. Lehrer
    • 1
  • Carmel U. Chiswick
    • 1
  1. 1.Fxonomics DepartmentUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations