Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 315–332 | Cite as

Gender preference and birth spacing in matlab, Bangladesh

  • Mizanur Rahman
  • Julie DaVanzo
Asian Fertility

Abstract

Gender preference, particularly son preference, is believed to sustain high fertility in many Asian countries, but previous research shows unclear effects. We examine and compare gender-preference effects on fertility in two otherwise comparable populations in Bangladesh that differ markedly in their access to and use of contraception. We expect, and find, stronger effects of gender preference in the population that has more access to contraception and higher levels of contraceptive use. Thus gender preference may emerge as a significant barrier to further national family planning efforts in Bangladesh. We find that if a woman has at least one daughter, the risk of a subsequent birth is related negatively to the number of sons. Women with no daughters also experience a higher risk of having a subsequent birth; this finding suggests that there is also some preference for daughters. Son preference is strong in both the early and later stages of family formation, but women also want to have at least one daughter after having several sons.

Keywords

Family Planning Treatment Area Gender Composition Gender Preference Comparison Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, Nilufer R. 1981. “Family Size and Sex Preferences among Women in Rural Bangladesh.” Studies in Family Planning 12:100–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, Paul. 1982. “Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories.” Pp. 61–98 in Sociological Methodology 1982, edited by S. Linhardt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, Ruhul and A. G. Mariam. 1987. “Son Preference in Bangladesh: An Emerging Barrier to Fertility Regulation.” Journal of Biosocial Science 19:221–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold, Fred. 1985. “Measuring the Effect of Sex Preference on Fertility: The Case of Korea.” Demography 22:280–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. —. 1987. “The Effect of Sex Preference on Fertility and Family Planning: Empirical Evidence.” Population Bulletin of the United Nations 23/24–1987:44–55.Google Scholar
  6. —. 1991. “Sex Preference for Children and Its Demographic and Health Implications.” Pp. 249–73 in Proceedings of the Demographic and Health Surveys World Conference, Vol. 1. Columbia, MD: IRD/Macro International, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Bairagi, Radheshyam. 1987. “A Comment on Fred Arnold’s “Measuring the Effect of Sex Preference on Fertility’.” Demography 24:137–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bairagi, Radheshyam and Ray L. Längsten. 1986. “Sex Preference for Children and Its Implications for Fertility in Rural Bangladesh.” Studies in Family Planning 17:302–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatia, Shushum, W. Henry Mosley, Abu S. G. Faruque, and Jotsnamoy Chakraborty. 1980. “The Matlab Family Planning-Health Services Project.” Studies in Family Planning 11:202–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, Kenneth H., Robert E. Black, Stan Becker, Shamsun Nahar, and J. Sawyer. 1982. “Consumption of Foods and Nutrients by Weanlings in Rural Bangladesh.” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 36:878–89.Google Scholar
  11. Chowdhury, Aminul I. and James F. Phillips. 1985. “Socio-economic Status Differentials among Currently Married Women of Reproductive Age: FP Services Project, 1974 Matlab Census.” Journal of Family Welfare 31:3–11.Google Scholar
  12. Chowdhury, Mridul K. and Radheshyam Bairagi. 1991. “Son Preference and Fertility in Bangladesh.” Population and Development Review 16:749–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cleland, John, Jane Verrall, and Martin Vaessen. 1983. “Preferences for the Sex of Children and Their Influence on Reproductive Behavior.” World Fertility Survey Comparative Studies: Cross-National Summaries No. 27. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Coale, Ansley J. 1973. “The Demographic Transition.” Pp. 53–72 in International Population Conference 1973, Vol. 1. Liege: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
  15. Coombs, Lologene C. 1979. “Prospective Fertility and Underlying Preferences: A Longitudinal Study in Taiwan.” Population Studies 33:447–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coombs, Lologene C. and Te-Hsiung Sun. 1978. “Family Composition Preferences in a Developing Culture: The Case of Taiwan.” Population Studies 32:43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cox, D.R. 1972. “Regression Models and Life Tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B34:187–202.Google Scholar
  18. Das, Narayan. 1987. “Sex Preference and Fertility Behavior: A Study of Recent Indian Data.” Demography 24:517–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DaVanzo, Julie and Ellen H. Starbird. 1991. “Correlates of Short Interbirth Intervals in Peninsular Malaysia: Their Pathways of Influence through Breastfeeding and Contraceptive Use.” Studies in Family Planning 22:241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Tray, Dennis. 1984. “Son Preference in Pakistan: An Analysis of Intentions versus Behavior.” Research in Population Economics 5:185–200.Google Scholar
  21. Gadalla, Saad, James McCarthy, and Oona Campbell. 1985. “How the Number of Sons Influences Contraceptive Use in Menoufia Governorate, Egypt.” Studies in Family Planning 16:164–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guilkey, David K., Ronald R. Rindfuss, Barry M. Popkin, John S. Akin, and Vincent Paqueo. 1988. “Child Spacing in the Philippines: The Effect of Current Characteristics and Rural Development.” Population Studies 42:259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huffman, Sandra L., Kathleen Ford, Hubert A. Allen, and P. Streble 1987. “Nutrition and Fertility in Bangladesh: Breastfeeding and Post Partum Amenorrhoea.” Population Studies 41:447–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaplan, E. and P. Meier. 1958. “Non-Parametric Estimation from Incomplete Observation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 53:457–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karki, Yagya B. 1988. “Sex Preference and the Value of Sons and Daughters in Nepal.” Studies in Family Planning 19:169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan, M. Ali and Ismail Sirageldin. 1977. “Son Preference and Demand for Additional Children in Pakistan.” Demography 14:481–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan, M. E., R. Anker, S. K. G. Dastidar, and S. Bairathi. 1989 “Inequalities between Men and Women in Nutrition and Family Welfare Services: An In-Depth Enquiry in an Indian Village.” Pp. 175–99 in Selected Readings in the Cultural, Social, and Behavioral Determinants of Health, edited by J. C. Caldwell and G. Santow. Canberra: Highland Press.Google Scholar
  28. Koenig, Michael A., Ubaidur Rob, Mehrab A. Khan, Jotsnamoy Chakraborty, Gillian H. C. Foo, and Vincent Fauveau. 1991. Contraceptive Use in Matlab, Bangladesh in 1990: Levels, Trends, and Explanations. MCH-FP Extension Project Working Paper 65. Dhaka: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  29. Lawless, J.F. 1982. Statistical Models and Methods for Life Time Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Leung, Siu F. 1988. “On the Test of Sex Preference.” Journal of Population Economics 1:95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McClelland, Gary H. 1979. “Determining the Impact of Sex Preferences on Fertility: A Consideration of Parity Progression Ratio, Dominance, and Stopping Rule Measures.” Demography 16:377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merrill, Deborah. 1989. “Children’s Gender and Marital Dissolution: Evidence from Developing Countries.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  33. Mukherji, S. 1977. “Desire for Children and Observed Fertility.” Journal of Family Welfare 24:16–22.Google Scholar
  34. Nag, Moni. 1991. “Sex Preference in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan, and Its Effect on Fertility.” Working Paper 27. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  35. National Research Council. 1989. Contraception and Reproduction: Health Consequences for Women and Children in the Developing World. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  36. Park, Chai Bin. 1978. “The Fourth Korean Child: The Effect of Son Preference on Subsequent Fertility.” Journal of Biosocial Science 10:95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —. 1983. “Preference for Sons, Family Size, and Sex Ratio: An Empirical Study in Korea.” Demography 20:333–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillips, James F., Ruth Simmons, Jotsnamoy Chakraborty, and Aminul I. Chowdhury. 1984. “Integrating Health Services into an MCH-FP Program: Lessons from Matlab, Bangladesh.” Studies in Family Planning 14:153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phillips, James F., Ruth Simmons, Michael A. Koenig, and Jotsnamoy Chakraborty. 1988. “Determinants of Reproductive Change in a Traditional Society: Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh.” Studies in Family Planning 19:313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips, James F., Wayne Stinson, Shushum Bhatia, and Jotsnamoy Chakraborty. 1982. “The Demographic Impact of the Family Planning Health Services Project in Matlab, Bangladesh.” Studies in Family Planning 15:62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rahman, Mizanur. 1990. “Gender Preference, Fertility Behavior, and Excess Female Child Mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh.” Doctoral dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  42. Rahman, Mizanur, Jalaluddin Akbar, James F. Phillips, and Stan Becker. 1992. “Sex Composition of Children and Contraceptive Use in Matlab, Bangladesh.” Studies in Family Planning 23:229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Repetto, Robert. 1972. “Son Preference and Fertility Behavior in Developing Countries.” Studies in Family Planning 3:70–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williamson, Nancy E. 1976. Sons or Daughters: A Cross Cultural Survey of Parental Preferences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mizanur Rahman
    • 1
  • Julie DaVanzo
    • 2
  1. 1.International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease ResearchDhakaBangladesh
  2. 2.RANDSanta Monica

Personalised recommendations