Demography

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 617–637 | Cite as

Recent trends in the process of stratification

  • David B. Grusky
  • Thomas A. DiPrete
Redistribution and Stratification

Abstract

Using the 14 annual cross-sections from the General Social Survey, we specify a “basic model” of attainment and describe the year-by-year fluctuations in its parameters. The results are partially consistent with theories describing the gradual growth of universalistic patterns of stratification and mobility. Under a linear model of educational achievement, we find that the direct effects of race are weakening and the returns to class-based advantages are declining in tandem. The contours of the socioeconomic “gender gap” are also changing in important ways, with the male intercept declining at a rapid pace and the female term registering small and insignificant yearby-year gains. At the same time, the returns to experience and schooling are increasing for men, whereas the corresponding returns for women have remained stable over the 15-year period. This pattern of interaction effects implies that the size of the gender gap varies over time and across different population groups.

Keywords

Labor Force Trend Line American Sociological Review General Social Survey Occupational Attainment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acker, J. (1980). “Women and Stratification: A Review of Recent Literature.” Contemporary Sociology, 9, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, R. A. (1966). Social Indicators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1971). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bensman, D., & Lynch, R. (1987). Rusted Dreams: Hard Times in a Steel Community. New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
  5. Berk, R. A. (1983). “An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data.” American Sociological Review, 48, 386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, F. D. (1988). “Discussion.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 4, 547–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blau, F. D., & Beller, A. H. (1988). “Trends in Earnings Differentials by Gender, 1971–1981.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 4, 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, P., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Blumberg, P. (1980). Inequality in an Age of Decline. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bose, C. E. (1985). Jobs and Gender: A Study of Occupational Prestige. New York: Pracger.Google Scholar
  11. Burstein, P. (1985). Discrimination, Jobs and Politics: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity in the United States Since the New Deal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burtless, G. (1990). A Futureof Lousy Jobs? The Changing Structure of U.S. Wages, ed. G. Burtless. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  13. Carlson, L. A. (1988). “Discussion.” Industrial and LaborRelations Review, 4, 549–552.Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, L. A., & Swartz, C. (1988). “The Earnings of Women and Ethnic Minorities, 1959–79.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 4, 530–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clogg, C. C. (1979). Measuring Unemployment: Demographic Indicators for the United States. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, S. S., & Zysman, J. (1987). Manufacturing Matters. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Corcoran, M., Duncan, G. J., & Ponza, M. (1983). “A Longitudinal Analysisof White Women’s Wages.” Journal of Human Resources, 18, 497- 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, J. A., & Smith, T W. (1987). General Social Surveys, 1972–1987: CumulativeCodebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  19. DiPrete, T. A., & Grusky, D. B. (1990a). “The Multilevel Analysis of Trends With Repeated Cross-sectional Data.” In Sociological Methodology 1990, ed. C. Clogg. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, pp. 337–368.Google Scholar
  20. — (1990b). “Structure and Trend in the Process of Stratification for American Men and Women.” American Journal of Sociology, 96, 107–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunlop, J. (1976). “The Limits of Legal Compulsion.” Labor Law Journal, 27, 67–74.Google Scholar
  22. England, P. (1982). “The Failure of Human Capital Theory to Explain Occupational Sex Segregation.” Journal of Human Resources, 17, 358–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farley, R. (1988). “After the Starting Line: Blacks and Women in an Uphill Race.” Demography, 25, 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Featherman, D. L., & Hauser, R. M. (1976). “Sexual Inequalities and Socioeconomic Achievement in the U.S., 1962–1973.” American Sociological Review, 41, 462–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. — (1978). Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Featherman, D. L., & Stevens, G. (1982). “A Revised Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status: Application in Analysis of Sex Differences in Attainment.” In Social Structure and Behavior: Essays in Honor of William Hamilton Sewell, eds. R. M. Hauser, D. Mechanic, A. O. Haller, & T S. Hauser. New York: Academic Press, pp. 141–181.Google Scholar
  27. Fligstein, N., & Wolf, W. (1978). “Sex Similarities in Occupational Status Attainment: Are the Results Due to the Restriction of the Sample to Employed Women?” Social Science Research, 7, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freeman, R. B. (1976). The Overeducated American. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goldthorpe, J. (1980). Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Greer, W. R. (1986, March 19). “Women Now the Majority in Professions.” New York Times, pp. C1, C10.Google Scholar
  31. Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1973). “Status Attainment Processes.” Sociology of Education, 46, 51–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hauser, R. M. (1971). Socioeconomic Background and Educational Performance. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  33. Hauser, R. M. (1987). “Trends in Socioeconomic Achievement Across the Life Course.” Unpublished grant proposal, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Sociology.Google Scholar
  34. Hauser, R. M., & Featherman, D. L. (1977). “Commonalities in Social Stratification and Assumptions About Status Mobility in the United States.” In The Process of Stratification, eds. R. M. Hauser & D. L. Featherman. New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–50.Google Scholar
  35. Heckman, J. J. (1974). “Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor Supply.” Econometrica, 42, 679–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. — (1979). “Sample Selection Biasas a Specification Error.” In Female LaborSupply: Theory and Estimation, ed. J. P. Smith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 206–248.Google Scholar
  37. Hollingshead, A. B. (1952). “Trends in Social Stratification: A Case Study.” American Sociological Review, 17, 679–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hout, M. (1988). “More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s.” American Journal of Sociology, 93, 1358–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jacobs, J., & Powell, B. (1987). “On Comparing the Socio-Economic Status of Men and Women.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Dept. of Sociology.Google Scholar
  40. Jones, F. L., & Kelley, J. (1984). “Decomposing Differences Between Groups.” Sociological Methods and Research, 12, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1986). Lisrel VI. Uppsala, Sweden: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  42. Judge, G., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. C., & Lee, T (1985). The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Kasarda, J. D. (1985). “Urban Change and Minority Opportunities.” In The NewUrban Reality, ed. P. E. Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar
  44. Kerr, C., Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. H., & Myers, C. A. (1960). Industrialism and Industrial Man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kochan, T A., Katz, H. C., & McKersie, R. B. (1986). The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Lipset, S. M., & Bendix, R. (1964). Social Mobilityin Industrial Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mare, R. D. (1980). “Social Background and School Continuation Decisions.” Journal of theAmerican Statistical Association, 75, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. — (1981). “Change and Stability in Educational Stratification.” American Sociological Review, 46, 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mare, R. D., & Chen, M. D. (1986). “Further Evidence on Sibship Size and Educational Stratification.” American Sociological Review, 51,403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marini, M. M. (1980). “Sex Differencesin the Process of Occupational Attainment: A Closer Look.” Social Science Research, 9, 307–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mason, W. M., Wong, G. Y.,& Entwisle, B. (1983). “Contextual Analysis Through the Multilevel Linear Model.” In Sociological Methodology 1983–1984, ed. S. Leinhardt. New York: Jossey-Bass, pp. 72–103.Google Scholar
  52. McClendon, M. J. (1976). “The Occupational Status Attainment Processes of Males and Females.” American Sociological Review, 4, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. Peterson, I. (1983, September 3). “Women Far Surpass Men in Gains in Employment Over the Recession.” New York Times, p. C9.Google Scholar
  55. Sewell, W. H., Hauser, R. M., & Wolf, W. C. (1980). “Sex, Schooling, and Occupational Status.” American Journal of Sociology, 86, 551–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sibley, E. (1942). “Some Demographic Clues to Stratification.” American Sociological Review, 7, 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, H. L. (1986). “Overeducation and Underemployment: An Agnostic Review.” Sociology of Education, 59, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, J. P., & Ward, M. P. (1984). Women’s Wages and Work in the Twentieth Century. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, T. W. (1989). An Analysis of Missing Data in the Study of Intergenerational Mobility, General Social Survey Methodological Report 67. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  60. Sorokin, P. A. (1927). Social and Cultural Mobility. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  61. Treiman, D. J. (1970). “Industrialization and Social Stratification.” In Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970s, ed. E. O. Laumann. New York: Babbs-Merrill, pp. 207–234.Google Scholar
  62. Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  63. Trieman, D. J., & Terrell, K. (1975). “Sex and the Process of Status Attainment: A Comparison of Working Women and Men.” American Sociological Review, 40, 174–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. U.S. Dept. of Labor. (1988). Employment and Earnings. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  65. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • David B. Grusky
    • 1
  • Thomas A. DiPrete
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyStanford UniversityStanford
  2. 2.Department of SociologyDuke UniversityDurham

Personalised recommendations