Demography

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 467–479 | Cite as

Fertility decline in Taiwan: A study using parity progression ratios

  • Griffith Feeney
Measurement

Abstract

Taiwan’s decline in fertility is studied by using period parity progression ratios. Levels of marriage and motherhood are found to have been high and essentially constant though the late 1980s, suggesting that the decline has been due almost entirely to declines in second and higher order-births. Families with three or more children play an important role in maintaining the current level of fertility. The level of fertility would be even lower without these families. They contributed more than one-half child per woman to the total fertility rate during most of the 1980s. Total fertility rates computed from the period parity progression ratios indicate a substantially higher level of fertility than the conventional total fertility rate; they remained above or at replacement level through 1988. A formal demographic analysis suggests that the conventional total fertility rate has been depressed by shifts in age at childbearing.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barclay, George W. 1954. Colonial Development and Population in Taiwan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, David and Anne R. Pebley. 1982. “Voluntary Childlessness: A Review of the Evidence and Implications.” Population Research and Policy Review 1(3): 203–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, Ming-Cheng, Ronald Freedman, and Te-Hsiung Sun. 1987. “Trends in Fertility, Family Size Preferences, and Family Planning Practice: Taiwan, 1961–85.” Studies in Family Planning 18(6): 320–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiang, Chin Long and B.J. van den Berg. 1982. “A Fertility Table for the Analysis of Human Reproduction.” Mathematical Biosciences 62: 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho, Lee-Jay, Robert D. Retherford, and Minja Kim Choe. 1986. The Own-Children Method of Fertility Estimation. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, Kingsley, Mikhail S. Bernstam, and Rita Ricardo-Cambell. 1986. Below-Replacement Fertility in Industrial Societies: Causes, Consequences, Policies. Supplement to Population and Development Review 12.Google Scholar
  7. Dixon, Ruth B. 1971. “Explaining Cross-Cultural Variations in Age at Marriage and Proportions Never Marrying.” Population Studies 25: 215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eaton, Joseph W. and Albert J. Mayer. 1954. Man’s Capacity to Reproduce. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Feeney, Griffith. 1985. “Parity Progression Projection.” In International Population Conference, Florence 1985, Volume 4. Liége, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
  10. Feeney, Griffith. 1986. “Period Parity Progression Measures of Fertility in Japan.” NUPRI Research Paper No. 35. Tokyo: Nihon University Population Research Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Feeney, Griffith. 1990. “The Demography of Aging in Japan.” NUPRI Research Paper No. 55. Tokyo: Nihon University Population Research Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Feeney, Griffith and Wolfgang Lutz. 1990. “Distributional Analysis of Period Fertility.” Pp. 169–95 and 271–78 in Future Demographic Trends in Europe and North America: What Can We Assume Today?, edited by Wolfgang Lutz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Feeney, Griffith and Yasuhiko Saito. 1985. “Progression to First Marriage in Japan: 1870–1980.” NUPRI Research Paper Series No. 24. Tokyo: Nihon University Population Research Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Feeney, Griffith, Feng Wang, Mingkun Zhou and Baoyu Xiao. 1989. “Recent Fertility Dynamics in China: Results from the 1987 One Percent Population Survey.” Population and Development Review 15(2): 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feeney, Griffith and Jingyuan Yu. 1987. “Period Parity Progression Measures of Fertility in China.” Population Studies 41: 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feichtinger, G. and Wolfgang Lutz. 1983. “Eine Fruchtbarkeitstafel auf Paritätsbasis.” Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 9(3): 363–77.Google Scholar
  17. Foster, Andrew. 1990. “Cohort Analysis and Demographic Translation: A Comparative Study of Recent Trends in Age Specific Fertility Rates from Europe and North America.” Population Studies 44(2): 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freedman, Ronald. 1986a. “Policy Options After the Demographic Transition: The Case of Taiwan.” Population and Development Review 12(1): 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —. 1986b. “On Underestimating the Rate of Social Change: A Cautionary Note.” Population and Development Review 12(3): 529–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freedman, Ronald, Ming-Cheng Chang, and Te-Hsiung Sun. 1982. “Household Composition, Extended Kinship and Reproduction in Taiwan: 1973–1980.” Population Studies 36(3): 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hajnal, J. 1947. “The Analysis of Birth Statistics in the Light of the Recent International Recovery of the Birthrate.” Population Studies 1: 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henry, Louis. (1953) 1980. Fertility of Marriages: A New Method of Measurement. New York: United Nations. Originally published as Fécondité des Mariages: Nouvelle Methode de Mesure.Google Scholar
  23. Heuser, Robert L. 1976. Fertility Tables for Birth Cohorts by Color: United States, 1971–73. Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  24. Kono, Shigemi and Akira Ishikawa. 1985. “Tempo and Parity Structure of Japanese Fertility.” Journal of Population Problems 174: 19–39. (In Japanese with English abstract.)Google Scholar
  25. Lee, Mei-lin. 1990. “Fertility Tempo and Fertility Transition in Taiwan.” Journal of Population Studies 13: 144–6. (In Chinese with English abstract.)Google Scholar
  26. Luther, Norman Y. and Lee-Jay Cho. 1988. “Reconstruction of Birth Histories from Census and Household Survey Data.” Population Studies 42(3): 451–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luther, Norman Y., Griffith Feeney, and Weimin Zhang. 1990. “One-child Families or a Baby Boom? Evidence from China’s One-per-Hundred Survey.” Population Studies 44: 341–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lutz, Wolfgang. 1989. Distributional Aspects of Human Fertility: A Global Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lutz, Wolfgang and Feichtinger, G. 1989. “Altersstruktureffekte bei der Schätzung schliesslicher Paritätsverteilungen.” In Demographie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Festschrift für Karl Schwarz, edited by C. Hahn, W. Linke, and R. Mackensen. Boppard am Rhein: Harald Boldt Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire. 1987. “Period Parity Progression Ratios and Birth Intervals in England and Wales, 1941–71: A Synthetic Life Table Approach.” Population Studies 41(1): 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Republic of China, Ministry of the Interior. 1976. 1975 Taiwan-Fukien Demographic Fact Book: Republic of China. Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  32. —. 1979. 1978 Taiwan-Fukien Demographic Fact Book: Republic of China. Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  33. —. 1989. 1988 Taiwan-Fukien Demographic Fact Book: Republic of China. Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  34. Ryder, Norman B. (1951) 1980. The Cohort Approach. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
  35. — 1964. “The Process of Demographic Translation.” Demography 1: 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. — 1980. “Components of Temporal Variations in American Fertility.” Pp. 15–54 in Demographic Patterns in Developed Societies, edited by R. W. Hiorns. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  37. — 1982. “Progressive Fertility Measures.” Technical Bulletin No.8. London: World Fertility Survey.Google Scholar
  38. — 1983. “Cohort and Period Measures of Changing Fertility.” Pp. 737–56 in Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, Volume 2, edited by Rudolfo A. Buletao and Ronald D. Lee. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, Peter C. 1980. “Asian Marriage Patterns in Transition.” Journal of Family History 5(1): 58–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taiwan Provincial Government, Department of Civil Affairs. 1971. 1970 Taiwan Demographic Fact Book: Republic of China. Nantou, Taiwan: Taiwan Provincial Government.Google Scholar
  41. Tuan, Chi-Hsien. 1958. “Reproductive Histories of Chinese Women in Rural Taiwan.” Population Studies 12: 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weinstein, Maxine, Te-Hsiung Sun, Ming-Cheng Chang, and Ronald Freedman. 1990. “Household Composition, Extended Kinship, and Reproduction in Taiwan: 1965–1985.” Population Studies 44(2): 217–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Westoff, Charles F. 1990. “The Return to Replacement Fertility: A Magnetic Force?” Pp. 227–33 and 271–78 in Future Demographic Trends in Europe and North America: What Can We Assume Today?, edited by Wolfgang Lutz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Whelpton, Pascal K. (1954) 1973. Cohort Fertility. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
  45. Willems, P., S. Wijewickrema, and R. Lesthaeghe. 1981. “De Evolutie van de Vruchtbaarheid in Belgié, 1950–1980.” Brussel: Centrum voor Bevo1kings- en Gesinsstudién.Google Scholar
  46. Xenos, Peter. 1990. “A New Look at Asia’s Nuptiality Transition.” Paper presented at the Nihon University International Symposium on Family and Contemporary Japanese Culture: An International Perspective, October, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Griffith Feeney
    • 1
  1. 1.East-West Population InstituteThe East-West CenterHonolulu

Personalised recommendations