Demography

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 447–455 | Cite as

Maternal Education and Child Immunization

  • Kim Streatfield
  • Masri Singarimbun
  • Ian Diamond
Child Health and Mortality

Abstract

This article explores the hypothesis that formal education of women results in increased child survival because of greater knowledge of the protective function of the major childhood immunizations. Education is also associated with greater awareness of proper immunization schedules. Irrespective of mother’s formal education level, specific immunization knowledge is associated with an increased likelihood of using immunization. The Indonesian analysis is important as a model for preventive health campaigns among other populations with low education levels among women.

Keywords

Maternal Education Child Survival Child Immunization Proximate Determinant Correct Knowledge 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basu, A. M. (1989). “Maternal Education and Childhood Mortality: A ‘Proximate’ Proximate Determinant.” Paper presented at an interdisciplinary workshop on mother’s schooling and child survival, Ahmedabad, India, January.Google Scholar
  2. Behrman, J. R., & Wolfe, B. L. (1987). “How Does Mother’s Schooling Affect Family Health, Nutrition, Medical Care Usage, and Household Sanitation.” Journal of Econometrics, 36, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell, J. C. (1979). “Education as a Factor in Mortality Decline: An Examination of Nigerian Data.” Population Studies, 33, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. —. (1981). “Maternal Education as a Factor in Child Mortality.” World Health Forum, 2(1), 75–78.Google Scholar
  5. Caldwell, J. C., Gajanayake, I., Caldwell, P., & Pieris, I. (1989). “Sensitization to Illness and the Risk of Death: An Explanation for Sri Lanka’s Approach to Good Health for All.” Social Science and Medicine, 28, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleland, J. (1989). “Maternal Education and Child Survival: Further Evidence and Explanations.” Paper presented at the Rockefeller Foundation Health Transition Workshop, Australian National University, Canberra, May 15–19. [See also Cleland, J. G., & van Ginneken, J. K. (1988). “Maternal Education and Child Survival in Developing Countries: The Search for Pathways of Influence.” Social Science & Medicine, 27, 1357–1368.]Google Scholar
  7. Mosley, W. H., & Chen, L. C. (1984). “An Analytical Framework for the Study of Child Survival in Developing Countries. ” Population and Development Review—Child Survival: Strategies for Research, eds. W. H. Mosley and L. C. Chen, 10 (Suppl.), 25–45.Google Scholar
  8. Royal Statistical Society (1986). The GLIM System Release 3.77 Manual. Oxford, UK: Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Streatfield, K. (1986). Fertility Decline in a Traditional Society: The Case of Bali, Indonesian Population Monograph Ser., No. 4. Canberra: Australian National University, Dept. of Demography.Google Scholar
  10. Streatfield, K., & Singarimbun, M. (1988). “Social Factors Affecting Use of Immunization in Indonesia.” Social Science and Medicine, 27, 1237–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Streatfield, K., Singarimbun, M., & Singarimbun, I. (1986). The Impact of Maternal Education on the Use of Child Immunization and Other Health Services, Child Survival Research Note 8. Canberra: International Population Dynamics Program, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Streatfield
    • 1
  • Masri Singarimbun
    • 2
  • Ian Diamond
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Child Survival Project, Demography DepartmentAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Population Research CenterGadjah Mada UniversityYogyakarta
  3. 3.Department of Social StatisticsUniversity of SouthamptonUK
  4. 4.Demography DepartmentAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations