Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 39–57 | Cite as

Intergenerational patterns of teenage fertility

  • Joan R. Kahn
  • Kay E. Anderson
Intergenerational Relations

Abstract

One of the frequently cited consequences of teen childbearing is the repetition of early births across generations, which thereby perpetuates a cycle of poverty and disadvantage. We use data from the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), Cycle IV, to examine trends and determinants of the intergenerational teen fertility link for women who reached adolescence between the 1950s and the 1980s. We find that daughters of both white and black teen mothers face significantly higher risks of teen childbearing than daughters of older mothers. We also find, more generally, that patterns of teenage family formation (i.e., both marriage and childbearing behaviors) tend to be repeated intergenerationally. The results suggest that the intrafamily propensity for early childbearing is not inherited biologically, at least not through factors related to the timing of puberty. Rather, the intergenerational patterns appear to operate at least in part through the socioeconomic and family context in which children grow up.

Keywords

Black Woman Family Formation Family Context Teen Birth Family Instability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraharnse, Allan F., Peter A. Morrison, and Linda J. Waite. 1988. “Teenagers Willing to Consider Single Parenthood: Who Is at Greatest Risk?” Family Planning Perspectives 29(1): 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderton, Douglas L., Noriko O. Tsuya, Lee L. Bean, and Geraldine P. Mineau. 1987. “Intergenerational Transmission of Relative Fertility and Life Course Patterns.” Demography 24(4):467–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Card, J.J. 1981. “Long-Term Consequences for Children of Teenage Parents.” Demography 18(2):137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooksey, Elizabeth C. 1990. “Factors in the Resolution of Adolescent Premarital Pregnancies.” Demography 27(2):207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Espenshade, Thomas J. 1985. “Marriage Trends in America: Estimates. Implications and Underlying Causes.” Population and Development Review 11(2):193–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox, Greer L. 1981. “The Family’s Role in Adolescent Sexual Behavior.” Pp. 73–130 in Teenage Pregnancy in a Family Context, edited by Theodora Ooms. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Furstenberg, Frank F., Jr. 1976. Unplanned Parenthood: The Social Consequences of Teenage Childbearing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Furstenberg, Frank F., Jr., Judith A. Levine. and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn. 1990. “The Children of Teenage Mothers: Patterns of Early Childbearing in Two Generations.” Family Planning Perspectives 22(2): 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garfinkel, Irwin and Sara S. McLanahan. 1986. Single Mothers and Their Children: A New American Dilemma. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gam, Stanley M. 1980. “Continuities and Change in Maturational Timing” Pp. 113–62 in Constancy and Change in Human Development, edited by Orville G. Brim, Jr. and Jerome Kagan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hanushek, Eric A. and John E. Jackson. 1977. Statistical Models for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hayes, Cheryl D. (Ed.). 1987. Risking the Future: Adolescent Sexuality. Pregnancy. and Childbearing, Volume I. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hofferth, Sandra L. 1987. “The Children of Teen Childbearers.” Pp. 172–206 in Risking the Future: Adolescent Sexuality, Pregnancy, and Childbearing. Volume 2, edited by Sandra L. Hofferth and Cheryl D. Hayes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hofferth, Sandra L., Joan R. Kahn, and Wendy Baldwin. 1987. “Premarital Sexual Activity among U.S. Teenage Women over the Past Three Decades.” Family Planning Perspectives 19:46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofferth, Sandra L. and Kristin A. Moore. 1979. “Early Childbearing and Later Economic Well-Being.” American Sociological Review 44(5):784–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hogan, Dennis P. and Evelyn M. Kitagawa. 1985. “The Impact of Social Status, Family Structure, and Neighborhood on the Fertility of Black Adolescents.” American Journal of Sociology 90: 825–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahn, Joan R., Ronald R. Rindfuss, and David K. Guilkey. 1990. “Adolescent Contraceptive Method Choices.” Demography 27(5):323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. McLanahan, Sara S. and Larry L. Bumpass. 1988. “Intergenerational Consequences of Family Disruption.” American Journal of Sociology 94(1):130–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moore, Kristin A. and Martha R. Burt. 1982. Private Crisis, Public Cost: Policy Perspectives on Teenage Childbearing. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, Kristin A. and Sandra L. Hofferth. 1978. The Consequences of Age at First Childbirth: Family Size. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Moore, Kristin A., Sandra L. Hofferth, Richard F. Wertheimer. 1981. “Teenage Childbearing: Consequences for Women, Families, and Government Welfare Expenditures.” pp. 35–54 in Teenage Parents and Their Offspring, edited by Keith G. Scott, Tiffany Field, Evan G. Robertson. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, Kristin A. and James Peterson. 1989. The Consequences of Teenage Pregnancy: Final Report. Washington, DC: Child Trends, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, Kristin A., M.C. Simms, and C.L. Betsey. 1986. Choice and Circumstance, Racial Differences in Adolescent Sexuality and Fertility. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  25. National Center for Health Statistics. 1990. Advance Report of Final Natality Statistics, 1988. Monthly Vital Statistics Report, 39(4), suppl. Hyattsville, Maryland: Public Health Service.Google Scholar
  26. Newcomer, Susan F. and J. Richard Udry. 1984. “Mothers’ Influence on the Sexual Behavior of Their Teenage Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 46:477–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Connell, Martin and Maurice J. Moore. 1980. “The Legitimacy Status of First Births to U.S. Women Aged 15-24, 1939-1978.” Family Planning Perspectives 12(1):16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pindyck, R.S. and D.L. Rubinfeld. 1981. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hili.Google Scholar
  29. Presser, Harriet B. 1978a. “Age at Menarche, Socio-Sexual Behavior, and Fertility.” Social Biology 25(2):94–101.Google Scholar
  30. Presser, Harriet B. 1978b. “Social Factors Affecting the Timing of the First Child.” pp. 159-79 in The First Child and Family Formation, edited by W.B. Miller and L.F. Newman. Carolina Population Center.Google Scholar
  31. Rodgers, Harrell R., Jr. 1990. Poor Women, Poor Families: The Economic Plight of America’s Female-Headed Households. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  32. Thornton, Arland. 1980. “The Influence of First Generation Fertility and Economic Status on Second Generation Fertility.” Population and Environment 3(1):51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thornton, Arland. and Donald Camburn, 1987. “The Influence of the Family on Premarital Sexual Attitudes and Behavior.” Demography 24(3):323–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Udry, J. Richard and R.L. Cliquet. 1982. “A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Relationship between Ages at Menarche, Marriage, and First Birth.” Demography 19(1):53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilson, Fiona. 1980. “Antecedents of Adolescent Pregnancy.” Journal of Biosocial Science 12:141–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan R. Kahn
    • 1
  • Kay E. Anderson
    • 2
  1. 1.Center on Population, Gender, and Social Inequality Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege Park
  2. 2.National Center for Health StatisticsHyattsville

Personalised recommendations