Demography

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 615–625 | Cite as

National Estimates of Cohabitation

  • Larry L. Bumpass
  • James A. Sweet
Demography of the Life Course

Abstract

Data from the 1987–1988 National Survey of Families and Households are used to provide national estimates of cohabitation trends and levels. The rapid increase since around 1970 is documented over both birth cohorts and marriage cohorts. Almost half of the persons in their early 30s and half of the recently married have cohabited. Changes in the proportion ever married are compared with changes in the proportion who have either married or cohabited. Much of the decline in marriage has been offset by increased living together without being married. The stability of unions of various types is compared. Cohabitations end very quickly in either marriage or disruption. About 60 percent of all first cohabitations result in marriage. Cohabiting unions and marriages preceded by cohabitation are much more likely to break up than are unions initiated by marriage. Multivariate analysis reveals higher rates of cohabitation among women, whites, persons who did not complete high school, and those from families who received welfare or who lived in a single-parent family while growing up.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balakrishnan, T. R., K. V. Rao, E. Lapierre-Adamcyk, and K. J. Krotki. 1987. A hazard model analysis of the covariates of marriage dissolution in Canada. Demography 24:395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, N. G., A. K. Blanc, and D. E. Bloom. 1988. Commitment and the modern union. American Sociological Review 53:127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth, A., and D. Johnson. 1988. Premarital cohabitation and marital success. Journal of Family Issues 9:255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bracher, M., and G. Santow. 1988. Changing Family Composition From Australian Life-History Data, Working Paper 6, Australian Family Project. Canberra, Australia: Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  5. Castro Martin, T., and L. L. Bumpass. 1989. Recent trends and differentials in marital disruption. Demography 26:37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clayton, R. R., and H. I. Voss. 1977. Shacking up: Cohabitation in the 1970s. Journal of Marriage and the Family 39:273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glick, P. C., and A. J. Norton. 1977. Marrying, divorcing and living together in the U.S. today. Population Bulletin 32(5).Google Scholar
  8. Leridon, H., and C. Villeneuve-Gokalp. 1988. Les nouveaux couples: Nombre, caractéristiques et attitudes. Population 43:331–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sweet, J. A. 1979. Estimates of Levels, Trends and Characteristics of the “Living Together” Population From the Current Population Survey, CDE Working Paper 79-49. Madison: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  10. Sweet, J. A., and L. L. Bumpass. 1974. Differentials in marital instability of the black population: 1970. Phylon 35(3).Google Scholar
  11. —, 1987. American Families and Households. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Sweet, J. A., L. L. Bumpass, and V. R. A. Call. 1988. The Design and Content of the National Survey of Families and Households (NSFH1). Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  13. Tanfer, K. 1987. Patterns of premarital cohabitation among never-married women in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thornton, A. 1988. Marriage and cohabitation in the 1980s. Demography 25497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Willis, R. J., and R. T. Michael. 1988. Innovation in Family Formation: Evidence on Cohabitation in the U.S. Paper presented at International Union for the Scientific Study of Population Seminar, Sendai City, Japan.Google Scholar
  16. Zelnik, M., and J. F. Kantner. 1980. Sexual activity, contraceptive use and pregnancy among metropolitan area teenagers: 1971–1979. Family Planning Perspectives 12(5):229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry L. Bumpass
    • 1
  • James A. Sweet
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Demography and EcologyUniversity of WisconsinMadison

Personalised recommendations