, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 201–216 | Cite as

The harmonic mean as the basis of a realistic two-sex marriage model

  • Robert Schoen


The “two-sex problem” is one of attempting to preserve the essential character of male and female rates of marriage (or birth), since the expression of those rates is influenced both by the age-sex composition of the population and the underlying age-sex schedule of preferences. The present paper focuses on marriage and advances a theoretically based, realistic, and conceptually simple solution. In the continuous case, where exact male and female ages are used, equation (11) provides a mathematical relationship which equates the sum of the male and female marriage propensities of the observed population with that of the model. When discrete age intervals are used, the two-sex consistency condition is given by equation (14) which equates observed and model population rates calculated using the harmonic means of the number of persons in the relevant male and female age groups. The harmonic mean consistency condition is shown to be fully sensitive to the competitive nature of the “marriage market.” When compared with alternative approaches to the two-sex problem in the context of data for Sweden, 1961–64, the simple harmonic mean method yields results fairly similar to those of the other methods. None of the two-sex methods do particularly well at predicting the actual distribution of marriages, however. The likely reason is that the underlying marriage preferences changed, a circumstance which emphasizes the importance of carefully conceptualizing how observed behavior can be decomposed into the effects produced by age-sex composition and those produced by the underlying preferences.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Das Gupta, P. 1972. On Two-Sex Models Leading to Stable Populations. Theoretical Population Biology 3:358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. — 1973. Growth of U.S. Population, 1940–1971, in the Light of an Interactive Two-Sex Model. Demography 10:543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. — 1978. An Alternative Formulation of the Birth Function in a Two-Sex Model. Population Studies 32:367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deming, William E. 1943. Statistical Adjustment of Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Frederickson, A. G. 1971. A Mathematical Theory of Age Structure in Sexual Populations: Random Mating and Monogamous Marriage Models. Mathematical Biosciences 10:117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodman, L. A. 1953. Population Growth of the Sexes. Biometrics 9:212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. — 1967. On the Age-Sex Composition of the Population that Would Result from Given Fertility and Mortality Conditions. Demography 4:423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. —. 1968. Stochastic Models for the Population Growth of the Sexes. Biometrika 55:469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Granville, William A., P. R. Smith and W. R. Longley. 1941. Elements of the Differential and Integral Calculus (rev. ed.). Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
  10. Heer, D. M. and A. S. Grossbard. 1979. The Wife Market, The Marriage Squeeze and Marital Fertility. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America in Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  11. Henry, L. 1969a. Schemas de Nuptialité: Déséquilibre des Sexes et Célibat. Population 24:457–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. — 1969b. Schemas de Nuptialité: Déséquilibre des Sexes et Age au Mariage. Population 24:1067–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. — 1972. Nuptiality. Theoretical Population Biology 3:135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoem, J. M. 1969. Concepts of a Bisexual Theory of Marriage Formation. Statistisk Tidskrift 4:295–300.Google Scholar
  15. Jordan, Chester W., Jr. 1967. Life Contingencies (2nd ed.). Chicago: Society of Actuaries.Google Scholar
  16. Karmel, P. H. 1947. The Relation Between Male and Female Reproduction Rates. Population Studies 1:249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kendall, D. G. 1949. Stochastic Processes and Population Growth. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 11:230–264.Google Scholar
  18. Keyfitz, Nathan. 1968. Introduction to the Mathematics of Population. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  19. —. 1971. The Mathematics of Sex and Marriage. Pp. 89–108, Vol. IV, Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. McFarland, D. D. 1972. Comparison of Alternative Marriage Models. Pp. 89–106 in Thomas N. E. Greville (ed.), Population Dynamics. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  21. — 1975. Models of Marriage Formation and Fertility. Social Forces 54:66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitra, S. 1976. Effect of Adjustment for Sex Composition in the Measurement of Fertility on Intrinsic Rates. Demography 13:251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. — 1978. On the Derivation of a Two-Sex Stable Population Model. Demography 15:541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mosteller, F. 1968. Association and Estimation in Contingency Tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parlett, B. 1972. Can There Be a Marriage Function? Pp. 107–135 in Thomas N. E. Greville (ed.), Population Dynamics. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  26. Pollard, A. H. 1948. The Measurement of Reproductivity. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries 75:151–182.Google Scholar
  27. Pollard, John H. 1973. Mathematical Models for the Growth of Human Populations. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. — 1975. Modelling Human Populations for Projection Purposes-Some of the Problems and Challenges. Australian Journal of Statistics 17:63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pollard, John H. 1977. The Continuing Attempt to Incorporate Both Sexes Into Marriage Analysis. Pp. 291-309 of Vol. 1 of the Proceedings of the General Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population in Mexico City.Google Scholar
  30. Schoen, R. 1977. A Two-Sex Nuptiality-Mortality Life Table. Demography 14:333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. — 1978. A Standardized Two-Sex Stable Population. Theoretical Population Biology 14:357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sweden, Statistiska Centralbyrån. Befolkningsrörelsen series for the years 1930–1949. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  33. Sweden, Statistiska Centralbyrån. Befolkningsrörelsen series for the years. 1974. Befolknings Förändringar 1973. Vol. 3. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  34. Sweden, Statistiska Centralbyrån. Befolkningsrörelsen series for the years. 1974. Marriages and Divorces in Sweden Since 1950. Information I Prognosfrågor 1974:4. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  35. Sweden, Statistiska Centralbyrån. Befolkningsrörelsen series for the years. Statistisk årsbok for the years 1958, 1969 and 1974. Stockholm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Schoen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbana

Personalised recommendations