Demography

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 575–589

Job characteristics of spouses and their work shifts

  • Harriet B. Presser
Articles

Abstract

This study builds on an earlier finding from the May 1980 Current Population Survey that one-third of full-time dual-earner couples with children in the United States include at least one spouse who works other than a regular day shift. Using the same data source, the relevance of husbands’ and wives’ job characteristics (occupation and industry) on their shift work status are considered, and the nature of the association between husbands’ and wives’ work shifts is explored. Four alternative models are initially posed and tested with log-linear analysis; these models vary in the extent to which a spouse’s shift work status is contingent upon the job characteristics of a husband or wife. None of these models fit the data. A modification of the simplest of the four models (using forward selection) is the best fitting model. It is not symmetrical: the wife’s shift is contingent upon both her occupation and industry and that of her husband, but the husband’s shift is contingent only upon his occupation and industry. There is a relationship between husband’s and wife’s shift, the direction of which depends upon the occupations of both spouses. This study demonstrates the importance of taking a “couple” perspective on shift work among married persons, and the need for models that include interaction effects.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banks, O. 1956. Continuous Shift Work: The Attitudes of Wives. Occupational Psychology 30: 69–84.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, Y. M. M., S. E. Feinberg, and P. W. Holland. 1975. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, P. M. and O. D. Duncan. 1964. The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, H. G. 1959. Some Effects of Shift Work on Social and Domestic Life. Occasional Paper No. 2. Hull University: Department of Economics and Commerce. Cited in M. Maurice. 1975. Shift Work: Economic Advantages and Social Costs. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  5. D’Amico, R. 1983. Status Attainment or Status Competition? Wife’s Relative Wages as a Determinant of Labor Supply and Marital Instability. Social Forces 61: 1186–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De la Mare, G. and J. Walker. 1968. Factors Influencing the Choice of Shift Rotation. Occupational Psychology 42: 1–21.Google Scholar
  7. Duncan, R. P. and C. Cummings Perruci. 1976. Dual Occupation Families and Migration. American Sociological Review 41: 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gagliani, G. 1981. How Many Working Classes? American Journal of Sociology 87: 259–285.Google Scholar
  9. Hawley, A. 1950. Human Ecology. New York: The Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hayghe, H. 1982. Marital and Family Patterns of Workers: An Update. Monthly Labor Review 105: 53–56.Google Scholar
  11. Hedges, J. N. 1975. Work Schedules and the Rush Hour. Monthly Labor Review 98: 43–47.Google Scholar
  12. — and Edward S. Sekscenski. 1979. Workers on Late Shifts in a Changing Economy. Monthly Labor Review 102: 14–22.Google Scholar
  13. Henretta, J. C. and A. M. O’Rand. 1983. Joint Retirement in the Dual Worker Family. Social Forces 62: 504–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hout, M. 1982. The Association between Husbands’ and Wives’ Occupations in Two-earner Families. American Journal of Sociology 88: 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lichter, D. T. 1982. The Migration of Dual-worker Families: Does the Wife’s Job Matter? Social Science Quarterly 63: 48–57.Google Scholar
  16. Mann, F. C. and L. R. Holfman. 1960. Automation and the Worker: A Study of Social Change in Power Plants. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  17. Maurice, M. and C. Monteil. 1965. Le travail continue en équipes successives. Revue française du travail. 18: 5–31. Cited in M. Maurice. 1975. Shift Work: Economic Advantages and Social Costs. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  18. Melbin, M. 1978. Night as Frontier. American Sociological Review 43: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morgan, J. N. 1981. Child Care When Parents Are Employed. Pp. 441–456 in M. S. Hill, D. H. Hill and J. N. Morgan (eds.). Five Thousand American Families-Patterns of Economic Progress, Vol. IX. The University of Michigan: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  20. Mott, P. E., F. C. Mann, Q. McLoughlin and D. P. Warwick. 1965. Shift Work: The Social, Psychological, and Physical Consequences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. O’Connor, C. M. 1970. Late-shift Employment in Manufacturing Industries. Monthly Labor Review 93: 37–42.Google Scholar
  22. Oppenheimer, V. K. 1977. The Sociology of Wornen’s Economic Role in the Family. American Sociological Review 42: 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piotrkowski, C. S. 1979. Work and the Family System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Parsons, T. 1949. The Social Structure of the Family. Pp. 173–201 in R. Anshen (ed.). The Family: Its Function and Destiny. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  25. Presser, H. B. 1982. Working Women and Child Care. Pp. 237–249 in P. W. Berman and E. R. Ramey (eds.). Women: A Developmental Perspective. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources, NIH Publication No. 82-2298.Google Scholar
  26. — and W. Baldwin. 1980. Child Care as a Constraint on Employment: Prevalence, Correlates, and Bearing on the Work and Fertility Nexus. American Journal of Sociology 85: 1202–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. — and V. Cain. 1983. Shift Work among Dualearner Couples with Children. Science 219: February 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Staines, G. L. and J. H. Pleck. 1982. Work Schedules’ Impact on the Family. Final report for the Administration of Children, Youth and Families. Grant No. 9O-C-1174.Google Scholar
  29. Tasto, D. L. and M. J. Colligan. 1977. Shift Work Practices in the U.S. Washington: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.Google Scholar
  30. Tasto, D. L., M. J. Colligan, E. W. Skjei and S. J. Polly. 1978. Health Consequences of Shift Work. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Report No. NIOSH-78-154.Google Scholar
  31. Tolbert, C., P. M. Horan and E. M. Beck (1980). The Structure of Economic Segmentation: A Dual Economy Approach. American Journal of Sociology 85: 1095–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ulich, E. 1957. Zur frage der belstung des arbeitenden menschen durch nacht-und schechtarbeit. Psychologische Rundschau (Gottingen) 1: 42–61. Cited in M. Maurice. 1975. Shift Work: Economic Advantages and Social Costs. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. 1978. The Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology. Technical Paper 40.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. 1982. Household and Family Characteristics. March 1981. Current Population Reports. Series P-20, No. 371.Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Department of Labor. 1981. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Workers on Late Shifts. Summary 81-13 (September).Google Scholar
  36. Wyatt, S. and R. Marriott. 1953. Night Work and Shift Changes. British Journal of Industrial Medicine 10: 164–172.Google Scholar
  37. Young, M. and P. Willmott. 1973. The Symmetrical Family: A Study of Work and Leisure in the London Region. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harriet B. Presser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations