Demography

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 559–574 | Cite as

A multilevel model of family planning availability and contraceptive use in rural Thailand

  • Barbara Entwisle
  • Albert I. Hermalin
  • Peerasit Kamnuansilpa
  • Apichat Chamratrithirong
Articles

Abstract

This paper assesses the ways in which the availability of family planning program outlets influences the likelihood of contraceptive use in rural Thailand. It focuses on a village-level measure of actual availability of sources rather than respondent perceptions of availability. Individuallevel and village-level data collected as part of the second Thailand Contraceptive Prevalence Survey are used to test three hypotheses about the effects of actual availability: that (a) availability of family planning outlets increases the likelihood of contraceptive use; (b) it enhances the effect of a desire for no more children on the likelihood of use; and (c) it weakens the positive relationship between education and the likelihood of use.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brackett, J. W. 1980. The Role of Family Planning Availability and Accessibility in Family Planning Use in Developing Countries. Paper presented at the World Fertility Survey Conference, London.Google Scholar
  2. Bulatao, R. A. and R. D. Lee. 1983. A Framework for the Study of Fertility Determinants. Pp. 1–27 in R. A. Bulatao and R. D. Lee (eds.). Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries. Vol. I. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chayovan, N. and J. Knodel. 1983. Improving the Collection of Village-Level Data: An Experience from Thailand. Paper presented at the World Fertility Survey Seminar on Collection and Analysis of Data on Community and Institutional Factors, London.Google Scholar
  4. Cornelius, R. M. and J. A. Novak. 1983. Contraceptive Availability and Use in Five Developing Countries. Studies in Family Planning 14: 302–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Entwisle, B. and W. M. Mason. 1983. The Multilevel Effects of Socioeconomic Development and Family Planning Program Effort on Children Ever Born. Research Reports 83-53. Ann Arbor, MI: Population Studies Center of The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  6. Frisen, C., G. F. Rolland and P. Severyns. 1979. Thailand: Report of Mission on Needs Assessment for Population Assistance. Report Number 13. UNFPA.Google Scholar
  7. Fuller, G. A. 1974. On the Spatial Diffusion of Fertility Decline: the Distance-to-Clinic Variable in a Chilean Community. Economic Geography 50: 324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanushek, E. A. and J. E. Jackson. 1977. Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hermalin, Albert I. 1983. Fertility Regulation and Its Costs: A Critical Essay. Pp. 1–53 in R. A. Bulatao and R. D. Lee (eds.). Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. — and B. Entwisle. 1982. Surveys and Their Use in Family Planning Analysis. Pp. 3–20 in A. I. Hermalin and B. Entwisle (eds.). The Role of Surveys in the Analysis of Family Planning Programs. Liege: Ordina.Google Scholar
  11. Hogan, D. P. and P. D. Frenzen. 1981. Antecedents to Contraceptive Innovation: Evidence from Rural Northern Thailand. Demography 18: 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamnuansilpa, P. and A. Chamratrithirong, 1981. Accessibility and Availability of Family Planning in Thailand. Paper presented at the IUSSP-WFS Seminar on the Analysis of the WFS Family Planning Module. Malaysia: Genting Highlands.Google Scholar
  13. — A. Chamratrithirong, and J. Knodel. 1982. Thailand’s Reproductive Revolution: An Update. International Family Planning Perspectives 8: 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knodel, J., A. Charnratrithirong, N. Chayovan, and N. Debavalya. 1982. Fertility in Thailand: Trends, Differentials, and Proximate Determinants. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  15. —, and N. Debavalya. 1978. Thailand’s Reproductive Revolution. International Family Planning Perspectives and Digest 4: 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. —, N. Debavalya and P. Karnunansilpa. 1980. Thailand’s Continuing Reproductive Revolution. International Family Planning Perspectives 3: 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis, G. L. and J. A. Novak. 1982. An Approach to the Measurement of Availability of Family Planning Services. Pp. 241–278 in A. I. Hermalin and B. Entwisle (eds.). The Role of Surveys in the Analysis of Family Planning Programs. Liege: Ordina.Google Scholar
  18. Mauldin, W. P. and R. J. Lapham. 1982. Measuring the Input of Family Planning Programs. Pp. 215–240 in A. I. Hermalin and B. Entwisle (eds.). The Role of Surveys in the Analysis of Family Planning Programs. Liege: Ordina.Google Scholar
  19. Morris, L., G. Lewis, D. L. Powell, J. Anderson, A. Way, J. Cushing and G. Lawless. 1981. Contraceptive Prevalence Surveys: A New Source of Family Planning Data. Population Reports 9: M163-M200.Google Scholar
  20. Muangman, D., J. Reynolds, J. Clinton, V. Kanchanasuk, D. Ostergard, P. Piya-Anant, Y. Porapakkham, S. Thanyapon, P. Soontornpipit and A. E. Wilson. 1981. Thailand’s Population Planning Project, 1979–1981: Report of a Joint Thai-US Assessment. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
  21. Rodriguez, G. 1977. Assessing the Availability of Fertility Regulation Methods: Report on a Methodological Study. Scientific Reports Number I. World Fertility Survey, London.Google Scholar
  22. Rodriguez, G. 1978. Family Planning Availability and Contraceptive Practice. International Family Planning Perspectives and Digest 4: 100–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenfield, A., A. Bennett, S. Varakamin and D. Lauro. 1982. Thailand’s Family Planning Program: An Asian Success Story. International Family Planning Perspectives 8: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swafford, M. 1980. Parametric Techniques for Contingency Table Analysis. American Sociological Review 45: 664–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsui, A. O., D. P. Hogan, J. D. Teachman, and C. Welti-Chanes. 1981. Community Availability of Contraceptives and Family Limitation. Demography 18: 615–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong, G. Y. and W. M. Mason. 1984.The Hierarchical Logistical Regression Model for Multilevel Analysis. Rearch Reports 84-56. Ann Arbor, MI: Population Studies Center of The University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Entwisle
    • 1
  • Albert I. Hermalin
    • 2
  • Peerasit Kamnuansilpa
    • 3
  • Apichat Chamratrithirong
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SociologyDartmouth CollegeHanover
  2. 2.The Population Studies CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  3. 3.Research CenterNational Institute for Development AdministrationBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Institute for Population and Social ResearchMahidol UniversityBangkok 4Thailand

Personalised recommendations