Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 333–350 | Cite as

A two-sex nuptiality-mortality life table

  • Robert Schoen
Article

Abstract

The “problem of the sexes” has been one of trying to reconcile inconsistent male and female demographic rates. The present paper deals with that question in the context of a two-sex nuptiality-mortality life table. A “rectangular” population, with equal numbers of persons in each age-sex group, is introduced as a standard, and a standardization relationship expressed in equation (9) relates changes in rectangular population rates to changes in age-sex composition. The standardization relationship is shown to satisfy a number of desirable properties and produce a realistic two-sex model. The standardization approach is then applied to data from Sweden for 1973, and the results and their implications are discussed. In particular, it is seen that the total number of marriages in a two-sex population neither is nor should be bounded by the total numbers of marriages in the associated male and female one-sex nuptiality-mortality tables.

Keywords

Life Table Marriage Market Marriage Rate Harmonic Mean Marriage Squeeze 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartlett, M. S. 1973. A Note on Das Gupta’s Two-Sex Population Model. Theoretical Population Biology 4:418–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coale, Ansley J. 1972. Growth and Structure of Human Populations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Das Gupta, P. 1972. On Two-Sex Models Leading to Stable Populations. Theoretical Population Biology 3:358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. —. 1973. Growth of U.S. Population, 1940–1971, in the Light of an Interactive Two-Sex Model. Demography 10:543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. —. 1976. An Interactive Nonrandom-Mating Two-Sex Model Whose Intrinsic Growth Rate Lies Between One-Sex Rates. Theoretical Population Biology 9:46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frederickson, A. G. 1971. A Mathematical Theory of Age Structure in Sexual Populations: Random Mating and Monogamous Marriage Models. Mathematical Biosciences 10:117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodman, L. A. 1953. Population Growth of the Sexes. Biometrics 9:212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. —. 1967. On the Age-Sex Composition of the Population That Would Result from Given Fertility and Mortality Conditions. Demography 4:423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. —. 1968. Stochastic Models for the Population Growth of the Sexes. Biometrika 55:469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henry, L. 1969a. Schemas de Nuptialité: Déséquilibre des Sexes et Célibat. Population 24:457–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. —. 1969b. Schemas de Nuptialité: Déséquilibre des Sexes et Âge au Marriage. Population 24:1067–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —. 1972. Nuptiality. Theoretical Population Biology 3:135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoem, J. M. 1969. Concepts of a Bisexual Theory of Marriage Formation Sãrtryck ur Statistisk Tidskrift 4:295–300.Google Scholar
  14. Jordan, Chester W., Jr. 1967. Life Contingencies. 2d ed. Chicago: Society of Actuaries.Google Scholar
  15. Karmel, P. H. 1948. An Analysis of the Sources and Magnitudes of Inconsistencies Between Male and Female Net Reproduction Rates in Actual Populations. Population Studies 2:240–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kendall, D. G. 1949. Stochastic Processes and Population Growth. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 11:230–264.Google Scholar
  17. Keyfitz, Nathan. 1968. Introduction to the Mathematics of Population. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1971. The Mathematics of Sex and Marriage. Pp. 89–108 in Volume 4 of the Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. McFarland, D. D. 1970. Effects of Group Size on the Availability of Marriage Partners. Demography 7:411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. —. 1972. Comparison of Alternative Marriage Models. Pp. 89–106 in Thomas N. E. Greville (ed.), Population Dynamics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. —. 1975. Models of Marriage Formation and Fertility. Social Forces 54:66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parlett, B. 1972. Can There Be a Marriage Function? Pp. 107–135 in Thomas N. E. Greville (ed.), Population Dynamics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pollard, John H. 1969. A Discrete-Time Two-Sex Age-Specific Stochastic Population Program Incorporating Marriage. Demography 6:185–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pollard, John H. 1971. Mathematical Models of Marriage. Paper presented to the Fourth Conference on the Mathematics of Population in Honolulu, July 28–August 1, 1971.Google Scholar
  25. — 1975. Modelling Human Populations for Projection Purposes—Some of the Problems and Challenges. Australian Journal of Statistics 17:63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Preston, Samuel H., N. Keyfitz, and R. Schoen. 1972. Causes of Death: Life Tables for National Populations. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schoen, Robert. 1975. Constructing Increment-Decrement Life Tables. Demography 12:313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. —, and K. C. Land. 1976. Finding Probabilities in Increment-Decrement Life Tables: A Markov Process Interpretation. Program in Applied Social Statistics Working Paper 7603. Urbana: Department of Sociology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  29. —, and V. E. Nelson. 1974. Marriage, Divorce, and Mortality: A Life Table Analysis. Demography 11:267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sweden, Statistiska Centralbyrån. 1974. Befolknings Förändringar 1973. Vol. 3. Stockholm: Statistiska Centralbyrån.Google Scholar
  31. Yellin, Joel, and P. A. Samuelson. 1977. Comparison of Linear and Non-Linear Models for Human Two-Sex Population Dynamics. Theoretical Population Biology 11:105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Schoen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbana

Personalised recommendations