Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 131–142 | Cite as

Sex ratio at birth: Values, variance, and some determinants

  • Gerald E. Markle
Articles

Abstract

This paper examines the values, variance and some possible determinants of sex ratios for the first child and for all children in expected and desired families. For adults in Tallahassee, Florida, it was found that a large majority of respondents within sixty demographic categories chose males for their first child. Of those who actually had girls for their first child, a plurality would, nevertheless, prefer a first boy in their desired family. It was hypothesized and demonstrated that sex-role ideologies were a strong predictor of variance in first-child sex preferences. Sex ratios for all children in expected and desired families were 116 and 113, respectively. If people could choose the sex of their future children, these data suggest that several population parameters might be significantly altered; a preliminary model is outlined which might project some of these changes.

Keywords

Male Ratio Religious Denomination Future Child Marriage Squeeze Puerto Rican Family 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dawes, R. M. 1970. Sexual Heterogeneity of Children as a Determinant of American Family Size. Oregon Research Bulletin 10, No. 8.Google Scholar
  2. Dinitz, S., R. Dynes, and A. Clark. 1964. Preference for Male or Female Children: Traditional or Affectional. Journal of Marriage and Family Living 16:128–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duncan, Otis Dudley, and Beverly Duncan. 1955. Residential Distribution and Occupational Stratification. American Journal of Sociology 60:494–503.Google Scholar
  4. Etzioni, Amitai. 1968. Sex Control, Science, and Society. Science 161:1007–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodman, Leo. 1961. Some Possible Effects of Birth Control on the Human Sex Ratio. Annals of Human Genetics 25:75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hill, R., J. Mayone Stycos, and K. Back. 1959. The Family and Population Control. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hoffman, L. W. 1960. Effects of Employment of Mothers on the Parental Power Relations and the Division of Household Labor. Journal of Marriage and Family Living 22: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keyfitz, Nathan, and Wilhelm Flieger. 1971. Population: Facts and Methods of Demography. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  9. Lerner, I. M. 1968. Heredity, Evolution and Society. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Lyster, W. R. 1970. Sex Ratio in the Australian Capitol Territory. Human Biology 42:670–678.Google Scholar
  11. Markle, Gerald E. 1973. The Potential Impact of Sex Predetermination on Fertility. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Tallahassee: Florida State University.Google Scholar
  12. —, and Charles B. Nam. 1971. Sex Predetermination: Its Impact on Fertility. Social Biology, 18:73–78.Google Scholar
  13. May, David gnA., and David M. Heer. 1968. Son Survivorship Motivation and Family Size in India: A Computer Simulation. Population Studies 22: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nam, Charles B., and Mary G. Powers. 1968. Changes in the Relative Status Level of Workers in the United States, 1950–1960. Social Forces 47: 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Teitelbaum, Michael S. 1972. Factors Associated with the Sex Ratio in Human Populations. Pp, 90–109 in G. A. Harrison and A. J. Boyce (eds.), The Structure of Human Populations. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Teitelbaum, Michael S. 1970. Factors Affecting the Sex Ratios in Large Populations. In Biosocial Aspects of Sex. Journal of Biosocial Science, Supplement No.2.Google Scholar
  17. — and Nathan Mantel. 1971. Socioeconomic Factors and the Sex Ratio at Birth. Journal of Biosocial Science 3:23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. . S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare 1968. Vital Statistics of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  19. Visaria, Pravin M. 1967. Sex Ratio at Birth in Territories with Relatively Complete Registration. Eugenics Quarterly 14:132–142.Google Scholar
  20. Westoff, Charles F., Philip C. Sagi, and Elliot G. Mishler. 1961. Family Growth in Metropolitan America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Williamson, N. E. 1973. Preferences for Sons Around the World. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald E. Markle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazoo

Personalised recommendations