, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 451–458 | Cite as

Family growth, household density, and moving

  • Albert Chevan


Residential and family histories collected from a sample of 4,027 couples in their first marriage and living in the Philadelphia-Trenton metropolitan area in 1960 are analyzed to determine the effects of marriage duration and childbearing on moving within the “local area.” Rates of moving decline sharply during the early years of marriage and more slowly after the tenth year. At any given marriage duration, the birth of children is associated with higher rates of moving. If the persons-per-room ratio of non-movers represents an acceptable household density, moving can be shown to be an adjustment mechanism whereby housing space is brought in balance with family needs. When couples who moved during a given three-year period defined in terms of marriage duration are compared with couples who did not move during that period, the movers are found to have had higher initial densities, would have had substantially higher densities had they not moved, but have similar terminal (after move) densities.


Household Head Previous Period Life Cycle Stage Dwelling Unit Family Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Glick, Paul C. and Robert Parke, Jr. 1965. New approaches in studying the life cycle of the family. Demography 2:187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Pearl, Raymond. 1937. Contraception and fertility in 2,000 women. Human Biology 4:363–407.Google Scholar
  3. Rossi, Peter. 1955. Why Families Move. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Shryock, Henry. 1964. Population Mobility Within the United States. Chicago: Community and Family Study Center, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  5. Simmons, James W. 1968. Changing residence in the city: a review of interurban mobility. The Geographical Review 58:622–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Speare, Jr., Alden. 1970. Home ownership, life cycle stage, and residential mobility. Demography 7:449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Tietze, Christopher. 1950. Differential fecundity and effectiveness of contraception. The Eugenics Review 50:231–237.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Chevan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherst

Personalised recommendations