Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 197–212 | Cite as

Mother’s home time and the production of child quality

  • Belton M. Fleisher
Articles

Abstract

This paper deals with the effect of mother’s time spent out of the labor force, and presumably in the home, on the “production” of child quality, where child quality is measured by intelligence (IQ), level of schooling attained, and market earning power. The results indicate that mother’s home time is most effective in producing (male) child quality for mothers who have attained relatively high levels of schooling. The results suggest that education programs which devote equal school resources to all (male) children do not necessarily provide equal educational opportunity and that the influence of family background on economic success is indirect, operating through home investments in children.

Keywords

Wage Rate Wage Equation Child Quality Market Wage Schooling Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. S. 1960. An Economic Analysis of Fertility. Pp. 209–231 in Ansley J. Coale (ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Universities-National Bureau Conference Series II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. —, and B. R. Chiswick. 1966. Education and the Distribution of Earnings. American Economic Review 56:358–369.Google Scholar
  3. — 1972. Comment. Journal of Political Economy 80(3, Part 2):252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belmont, L., and F. A.Marolla. 1973. Birth Order, Family size, and Intelligence. Science 182:1096–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Porath, Y. 1973. Economic Analysis of Fertility in Israel: Point and Counterpoint. Journal of Political Economy 81:S202-S233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowles, S. 1972. Schooling and Inequality from Generation to Generation. Journal of Political Economy 80(3, Part 2):219–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. — 1973. Understanding Unequal Economic Opportunity. American Economic Review 63:346–356.Google Scholar
  8. Breland, H. M. 1973. Birth Order Effects, A Reply to Schooler. Psychological Bulletin 80:210–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiswick, B. R., and J. Mincer. 1972. Time-Series Changes in Personal Income Inequality in the United States from 1939, with Projections to 1985. Journal of Political Economy 80:S34-S66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, Malcolm S., S. A. Rhea, Jr., and R. I. Lerman. 1970. A Micro Model of Labor Supply. Bureau of Labor Statistics Staff Report No.4. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. S. 1966. Equal Schools or Equal Students. The Public Interest 4:70–75.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, Franklin M. I 970(a). Simultaneous Equation Estimation: The State of the Art. Institute for Defense Analysis Economic Papers. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Defense Analysis.Google Scholar
  13. — 1970(b). Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions: An Expository Note. Econometrica 38:361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flanagan, R. J. 1974. Labor Force Experience, Job Turnover, and Racial Wage Differentials. Review of Economics and Statistics 56:521–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gintis, H. 1971. Education, Technology, and the Characteristics of Worker Productivity. American Economic Review 61:266–279.Google Scholar
  16. Griliches, Z., and W. Mason. 1972. Education, Income, and Ability. Journal of Political Economy 80:S74-SI03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heckman, J. J., and S. W. Polachek. 1974. Empirical Evidence on the Form of the Earnings-Schooling Relationship. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69:350–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill, C. Russell, and F. P. Stafford. 1974(a). Allocation of Time to Preschool Children and Educational Opportunity. Journal of Human Resources 9:323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill, C. Russell, and F. P. Stafford. I974(b). Family Background and Lifetime Earnings. Paper presented at the Econometric Society Meetings, San Francisco, December 27–29, 1974.Google Scholar
  20. Kohen, Andrew I. 1972. Determinants of Early Labor Market Success Among Young Men: Race, Ability, Quantity and Quality of Schooling. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  21. Leibowitz, Arleen S. 1972. Women’s Allocation of Time to Market and Nonmarket Activities: Differences by Education. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  22. — 1973. Comment. American Economic Review 63:357–358.Google Scholar
  23. — 1974. Home Investments in Children. Journal of Political Economy 82(2, Part 2):SIII-SI29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. — 1975. Education and the Allocation of Women’s Time. Pp. l71–197 in F. Thomas Juster (ed.), Education, Income, and Human Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hili Book Company.Google Scholar
  25. Lindert, Peter A. 1977. Fertility and Scarcity in America. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  26. Maddala, G. S. 1974. Some Small Sample Evidence on Tests of Significance in Simultaneous Equations Models. Econometrica 42:841–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mincer, Jacob. 1970. The Distribution of Labor Incomes, A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature 8:1–26.Google Scholar
  28. — 1974. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  29. Schooler, C. 1973. Birth Order Effects: Not Here, Not Now. Psychological Bulletin 80:210–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schultz, T. W. (ed.). 1973. New Economic Approaches to Fertility. Journal of Political Economy 81(2, Part 2): entire issue.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Belton M. Fleisher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations