Demography

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 173–188 | Cite as

Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility

  • Alden Speare
Articles

Abstract

The stress-threshold model (Wolpert, 1965; Brown and Moore, 1970) assumes that people do not consider moving unless they experience residential stress. This paper develops a similar model of residential mobility in which residential satisfaction acts as an intervening variable between individual and residence variables and mobility. The model is tested with data from a panel study of Rhode Island residents. The results indicate that residential satisfaction at the first interview is related to the wish to move and to mobility in the year following the interview. Individual and residence characteristics such as age of head duration of residence, home ownership, and room crowding are shown to affect mobility through their effect on residential satisfaction.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blumen, Isadore, Marvin Kogan, and Philip J. McCarthy. 1955. The Industrial Mobility of Labor as a Probability Process. Cornell Studies in Industrial and Labor Relations, Vol. VI. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, Lawrence A., and John Holmes. 1971. Intra-Urban Migrant Lifelines: A Spatial View. Demography 8:103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —, and David B. Longbrake. 1970. Migration Flows in Intra-Urban Space: Place Utility Considerations. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 60:368–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. —, and Eric G. Moore. 1970. The Intra-Urban Migration Process: A Perspective. Geografiska Annaler, Series B 52: 1–13.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, Edgar W. 1970. Theoretical Issues in the Utilization of Areal, Demographic, and Social Psychological Dimensions in Migration Research. Unpublished paper presented at the NICHD Conference on Migration Histories, Washington, D.C., February 5–6, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. —, F. Stuart Chapin, Jr., George C. Hemmens, Edward J. Kaiser, Michael A. Stegmann, and Shirley F. Weiss. 1969. Moving Behavior and Residential Choice-A National Survey. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report No. 81. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board, National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, W. A. V. 1970. Measurement and Explanation in Intra-urban Residential Mobility. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 60:49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Golant, Stephen M. 1971. Adjustment Process in a System: A Behavioral Model of Human Movement. Geographical Analysis 3: 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldstein, Sidney. 1958. Patterns of Mobility, 1910–1950. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1964. The Extent of Repeated Migration: An Analysis Based on the Danish Population Register. Journal of the American Statistical Association 59:1121–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kendall, M. G., and A. Stuart. 1958. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Vol. 2. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
  12. Land, Kenneth C. 1969. Duration of Residence and Prospective Migration: Further Evidence. Demography 6:133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lansing, John B., and Eva Mueller. 1967. The Geographic Mobility of Labor. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, Everett S. 1966. A Theory of Migration. Demography 3:47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McGinnis, Robert. 1968. A Stochastic Model of Social Mobility. American Sociological Review 33:712–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morrison, Peter A. 1967. Duration of Residence and Prospective Migration: The Evaluation of a Stochastic Model. Demography 4:553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. —. 1971. Chronic Movers and the Future Redistribution of Population. Demography 8:171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. —. 1972. Population Movements and the Shape of Urban Growth: Implications for Public Policy. R-1072-CPG. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  19. Myers, George C., Robert McGinnis, and George Masnick, 1967. The Duration of Residence Approach to a Dynamic Stochastic Model of Internal Migration: A Test of the Axiom of Cumulative Inertia. Eugenics Quarterly 14:121–126.Google Scholar
  20. Organic, Harold, and Sidney Goldstein. 1970. The Brown University Population Research Laboratory: Its Purposes and Initial Progress. Pp. 212–232 in Irving I. Kessler and Morton L. Levin (eds.), The Community as an Epidemiologic Laboratory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rossi, Peter H. 1955. Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sabagh, Georges, Maurice van Arsdol, Jr., and Edgar Butler. 1969. Some Determinants of Intrametropolitan Residential Mobility: Conceptual Consideration. Social Forces 48: 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simmons, J. W. 1968. Changing Residence in the City: A Review of Intra-urban Mobility. Geographical Review 58:622–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Sjaastad, Larry A. 1962. The Costs and Returns of Human Migration. Journal of Political Economy. 70(5, part 2):80–93.Google Scholar
  25. Speare, Alden, Jr. 1970. Home Ownership, Life Cycle Stage, and Residential Mobility. Demography 7:449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. — 1971a. A Cost-Benefit Model of Rural to Urban Migration in Taiwan. Population Studies 25:117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Speare, Alden, Jr. 1971b. Alternative Models of Individual Mobility. Pp, 364–368 in Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section.Google Scholar
  28. Stone, Leroy O. 1971. On the Analysis of the Structure of Metropolitan Area Migration Streams. Educational Planning Occasional Paper No. 1171. Toronto: Department of Educational Planning, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
  29. van Arsdol, Maurice D., Jr., Georges Sabagh, and Edgar W. Butler. 1968. Retrospective and Subsequent Metropolitan Residential Mobility. Demography 5:249–267.Google Scholar
  30. Wolpert, Julian. 1965. Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate. Papers of the Regional Science Association 15:159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. —. 1966. Migration as an Adjustment to Environmental Stress. Journal of Social Issues 22:92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alden Speare
    • 1
  1. 1.Populatlon Studies and Training CenterBrown UniversityProvidence

Personalised recommendations