Previous research has shown that mobility rates decline with increasing age and duration of residence. These relationships are investigated further for the case of residential mobility using residence histories obtained in interviews with 2264 Rhode Island residents. Three methods of classifying segments of a person’s life into life cycle stages are compared: age, life cycle stages based on marital status and child-rearing periods, and a combined age-marital status classification. These classifications were not found to be equivalent in that there was considerable variation in mobility rates by life cycle stage within age categories and by age within life cycle categories. The age-marital status classification was selected for use in the remainder of the analysis because it had the least variation in mobility rates within categories and required far less data for computation than the life cycle stages. When mobility rates were examined by home ownership, age-marital status, and duration of previous residence, it was observed that there was little variation in mobility rates by duration for home owners while the mobility rates for renters declined with duration.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Goldstein, Sidney. 1958. Patterns of Mobility, 1910–1950. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- —, and Kurt B. Mayer. 1963. Residential Mobility, Migration, and Commuting in Rhode Island. Providence: Planning Division, Rhode Island Development Council, State Planning Section Publication No.7.Google Scholar
- Lansing, John B. and Eva Mueller. 1967. The Geographical Mobility of Labor. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- —, Charles W. Clifton, and James N. Morgan. 1969. New Homes and Poor People. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Myers, George C., Robert McGinnis, and George Masnick. 1967. The duration of residence approach to a dynamic stochastic model of internal migration: a test of the axiom of cumulative inertia. Eugenics Quarterly 14:121–126.Google Scholar
- Rossi, Peter. 1955. Why Families Move. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Speare, Alden Jr. 1966. Social interaction as a function of length of residence in an urban neighborhood. Unpublished paper prepared in connection with the 1966 Detroit Area Study of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Taeuber, Karl E., Leonard Chiazze, Jr., and William Haenszel. 1968. Migration in the United States: An Analysis of Residence Histories. Public Health Monograph No. 77, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
- United States Bureau of the Census. 1963a. U. S. Census of Population 1960. Characteristics of the Population. Vol. 1, Part 41, Rhode Island. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- —. 1963b. U. S. Census of Population 1960. Subject Report: Mobility for States and State Economic Areas. Final Report PC(2)2B. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- —. 1968. Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 171. Mobility of the Population of the United States: March 1966 to March 1967. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar