Advertisement

Estuaries

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 369–383 | Cite as

Historical trends in salinity and substrate in central Florida Bay: A paleoecological reconstruction using modern analogue data

  • G. Lynn Brewster-WingardEmail author
  • Scott E. Ishman
Article

Abstract

Understanding the natural spatial and temporal variability that exists within an ecosystem is a critical component of efforts to restore systems to their natural state. Analysis of benthic foraminifers and molluscs from modern monitoring sites within Florida Bay allows us to determine what environmental parameters control spatial and temporal variability of their assemblages. Faunal assemblages associated with specific environmental parameters, including salinity and substrate, serve as proxies for an interpretation of paleoecologic data. The faunal record preserved in two shallow (<2 m) cores in central Florida Bay (Russell Bank and Bob Allen Bank) provides a record of historical trends in environmental parameters for those sites. Analysis of these two cores has revealed two distinct patterns of salinity change at these sites: 1) a long-term trend of slightly increasing average salinity; and 2) a relatively rapid change to salinity fluctuations of greater frequency and amplitude, beginning around the turn of the century and becoming most pronounced after 1940. The degree of variability in substrate types at each locality limits interpretations of substrate trends to specific sites. A common sequence of change is present in the Russell Bank and Bob Allen Bank cores: from mixed grass and bare-sediment indicators at the bottom of the cores, to bare-sediment dwellers in the center, to a dominance of vegetative-cover indicators at the top of the cores. Changes in interpreted salinity patterns around the turn of the century are consistent with the timing of the construction of the Flagler Railroad from 1905 to 1912, and the Tamiami Trail and the canal and levee systems between 1915 and 1928. Beginning around 1940, the changes in the frequency and amplitude of salinity fluctuations may be related to changes in water management practices, meteorologic events (frequent hurricanes coupled with severe droughts in 1943 and 1944), or a combination of factors. The correspondence of these changes in Florida Bay with changes in the terrestrial Everglades suggests factors affecting the entire ecosystem are responsible for the salinity and substrate patterns seen in Florida Bay.

Keywords

Foraminifera United States Geological Survey Benthic Foraminifera Historical Trend Foraminiferal Assemblage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott, R. T. 1974. American Seashells, 2nd edition. Van, Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, J. 1971. Shells and Shores of Texas. University of Texas, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  3. Benda, W. K. andH. S. Puri. 1962. The distribution of foraminifera and ostracoda off the Gulf Coast of the Cape Romano area, Florida.Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies 7:303–341.Google Scholar
  4. Bock, W. D. 1971. A handbook of the benthonic foraminifera, of Florida Bay and adjacent waters, p. 1–72.In W. D. Bock, G. W. Lynts, S. L. Smith, R. C. Wright, W. W. Hay, and J. I. Jones (eds.), A Symposium of Recent South Florida Foraminifera. Miami Geological Society Memoirs 1, Miami Geological Society Publishing, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  5. Bock, W. D., G. W. Lynts, S. Smith, R. Wright, W. W. Hay, andJ. I. Jones. 1971. A symposium of Recent south Florida Foraminifera. Miami Geological Society Memoir 1, Miami Geological Society Publication, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  6. Brasier, M. D. 1975. Ecology of Recent sediment-dwelling and phytal foraminifera from the lagoons of Barbuda, West Indies.Journal of Foraminiferal Research 5:42–62.Google Scholar
  7. Brewster-Wingard, G. L., S. E. Ishman, L. E. Edwards, andD. A. Willard. 1996. Preliminary report on the distribution of modern fauna and flora at selected sites in north-central and north-eastern Florida Bay. Open-File Report, 96-732. United States Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. (Copy of Open-File Report available online at <http://geology.er.usgs.gov/gmapeast/fla/home.html>Google Scholar
  8. Brewster-Wingard, G. L., S. E. Ishman, D. A. Willard, L. E. Edwards, andC. W. Holmes. 1997. Preliminary paleontological report on cores 19A and 19B, from Russell Bank. Everglades National Park, Florida Bay. Open-File Report 97-460. United States Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. (Copy of Open-File Report available online at <http://geology.er.usgs.gov/gmapeast/fla/home.html>Google Scholar
  9. Emerson, W. K. andM. K. Jacobson. 1976. The American Museum of Natural History Guide to Shells: Land, Freshwater, and Marine, From Nova Scotia to Florida. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Halley, R. B., P. K. Swart, R. E. Dodge, andJ. H. Hudson. 1994. Decade-scale trend in sea water salinity revealed through δ18O analysis ofMontastraea annularis annual growth bands.Bulletin of Marine Science 54:670–678.Google Scholar
  11. Lagoe, M. B.. 1979. Recent benthic foraminiferal biofacies in the Arctic Ocean.Micropaleontology 25:214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lidz, B. H., andP. R. Rose. 1989. Diagnostic foraminiferal assemblages of Florida Bay, and adjacent shallow water: A comparison.Bulletin of Marine Science 44:399–418.Google Scholar
  13. Light, S. S., andJ. W. Dineen. 1994. Water Control in the Everglades: A historical perspective, p. 47–84.In S. M. Davis and J. C. Ogden, (eds.) Everglades: The Ecosystem and Its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida.Google Scholar
  14. Lyons, W. G. 1996. An assessment of mollusks as indicators of environmental change in Florida Bay, p. 52–54.In Programs and Abstracts, 1996 Florida Bay Science Conference. Florida Sea Grant, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
  15. Martin, R. E.. 1986. Habitat and distribution of the foraminiferaArchaias angulatus (Fitchel and Moll) (Miliolina, Soritidae), northern Florida Keys.Journal of Foraminiferal Research 16:201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McPherson, B. F., andR. Halley. 1996. The south Florida environment—A region under stress. Circular 1134. United States Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  17. Murray, J. W.. 1991. Ecology and Palaeoecology of Benthic Foraminifera. Longman, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Parker, R. H.. 1959. Macro-invertebrate assemblages of central Texas coastal bays and Laguna Madre.Bulletin of American Petroleum Geologists 43:2100–2166.Google Scholar
  19. Perry, L. M., andJ. S. Schwengel. 1955. Marine Shells of the Western Coast of Florida. Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Phleger, F. B.. 1954. Ecology of foraminifera and associated microorganisms from Mississippi Sound and environs.American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 38:584–647.Google Scholar
  21. Phleger, F. B.. 1955. Ecology of foraminifera in southeastern Mississippi Delta area.American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 39:712–752.Google Scholar
  22. Phleger, F. B. 1956. Significance of living foraminiferal populations along the central Texas coast.Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research Contributions 7:106–151.Google Scholar
  23. Phleger, F. B., andR. R. Lankford. 1957. Seasonal occurrences of living benthonic foraminifera in some Texas Bays.Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research Contributions 8:93–105.Google Scholar
  24. Poag, C. W.. 1978. Paired foraminiferal ecophenotypes in Gulf Coast estuaries: Ecological and paleoecological implications.Transactions of the Gulf Coast Associations of Geological Societies 28:395–421.Google Scholar
  25. Poag, C. W.. 1981. Ecological Atlas of Benthic Foraminifera of the Gulf of Mexico. Marine Science International, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  26. Prager, E., R. B. Halley, andP. Orton. 1997. Sediment resuspensions, surface properties and seagrass in Florida Bay, p. 69–70.In United States Geological Survey Program on the South Florida Ecosystem: Proceedings of the Technical Symposium in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, August 25–27, 1997. Open-File Report 97-385. United States Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  27. Robbins, J. A., C. W. Holmes, R. B. Halley, M. Bothner, E. A. Shinn, J. Graney, G. Keller, M. tenBrinck, and D. Rudnick. in press. Time constraints characterizing predeposition integration of137Ce and Pb fluxes to sediments in Florida Bay.Geochemica et Cosmochemica.Google Scholar
  28. Rose, P. R., andB. Lidz 1977. Diagnostic Foraminiferal Assemblages of Shallow-water Modern Environments: South Florida and the Bahamas. Sedimenta VI. University of Miami, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  29. Schnitker, D.. 1971. Distribution of foraminifera on the North Carolina continental shelf.Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology 8:169–215.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, III,T. J., J. H. Hudson, M. B. Robblee, G. V. N. Powell, andP. J. Isdale. 1989. Freshwater flow from the Everglades to Florida Bay: A historical reconstruction based on fluorescent banding in the coralSolenastrea bournoni.Bulletin of Marine Science 44:274–282.Google Scholar
  31. Swart, P. K., G. F. Healy, R. E. Dodge, P. Kramer, J. H. Hudson, R. B. Halley, andM. B. Robblee. 1996a. The stable oxygen and carbon isotopic record from a coral growing in Florida Bay: A 160 year record of climatic and anthropogenic influence.Paleogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 123:219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swart, P. K., G. F. Healy, andR. B. Halley. 1996b. Analyzing the isotopic compositions of coral and mollusk skeletons to relate past salinity and nutrient levels in Florida Bay, p. 82–83.In Programs and Abstracts, 1996 Florida Bay Science Conference. Florida Sea Grant, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
  33. Turney, W. J., andB. F. Perkins. 1972. Molluscan Distribution in Florida Bay. Sedimenta III. University of Miami, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  34. Wagner, J. I., andP. C. Rosendahl. 1982. Structure S-12 Water Distribution to Everglades National Park. South Florida Research Center Report T-650. South Florida Research Center, Florida.Google Scholar
  35. Warmke, G. L., andR. T. Abbott. 1961. Caribbean Seashells. Livingston Publishing Co., Narberth, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  36. Willard, D. A., C. W. Holmes, andL. M. Weimer. 1997. Vegetational changes in south Florida over the last two milenia, p. 96–97.In Open-File Report 97-385. United States Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  37. Wingard, G. L., S. E. Ishman, T. M. Cronin, L. E. Edwards, D. A. Willard, andR. B. Halley. 1995. Preliminary analysis of down-core biotic assemblages: Bob Allen Keys, Everglades National Park, Florida Bay. Open-File Report 95-628. United States Geological Survey, Reston Virginia. (Copy of Open-File Report available online at <http://geology.er.usgs.gov/gmapeast/fla/home.html>Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National CenterUnited States Geological Survey MS 926 AReston

Personalised recommendations