, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 449–457 | Cite as

Impacts of seagrass habitat architecture on bivalve settlement

  • Paul A. X. Bologna
  • Kenneth L. Heck


We investigated the effects of differing spatial scales of seagrass habitat architecture on the composition and abundance of settling bivalves in a sub-tropical seagrass community. The density of newly settled bivalves was generally greater atThalassia testudinum grass bed edge (<1 m) compared to interior portions of the bed (>10 m). Deviation from this generalized pattern occurred when high densities of newly settled tulip mussels (Modiolus americanus) were recorded from the interior of the meadow, associated with aggregations of adult mussels. Bivalve settling densities appear to reflect settlement shadows of passively delivered larvae, bedload transport of newly settled individuals from unvegetated regions, as well as gregarious settlement among adult conspecifics. We also investigated the impact of seagrass patch shape and size on settlement by using artificial seagrass units (ASU) in separate short-term and long-term experiments. We found a positive relationship between ASU perimeter and bivalve abundance, suggesting that larval encounter rates with seagrass habitat may determine initial settlement patterns. Using ASUs we also investigated the relative role seagrass epiphytes play in determining the density of settling bivalves. Results showed greater settling densities where epiphytic secondary structure was elevated compared to controls, and bivalve density was significantly greater when ASUs were fouled with a natural community of epiphytes, suggesting that both microstructure and biofilms positively influenced bivalve settlement. We conclude that structural components of seagrass habitats increase bivalve settlement at multiple spatial scales, including epiphytic micro-structure, small-scale patch shape and size, and large-scale within habitat differences.


Bivalve Marine Ecology Progress Series Bedload Transport Seagrass Habitat Patch Shape 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Ackerman, J. D., B. Sim, S. J. Nichols, andR. Claud. 1994. A review of the early life history of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha): Comparisons with marine bivalves.Canadian Journal of Zoology 72:1169–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrose, W. G. andE. A. Irlandi. 1992. Height of attachment on seagrass leads to trade-off between growth and survival in bay scallopArgopecten irradians.Marine Ecology Progress Series 90: 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armonies, W. andM. Hellwig-Armonies. 1992. Passive settlement ofMacoma balthica spat on tidal flats of the Wadden Sea and subsequent migration of juveniles.Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 29:371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballantine, D. andH. J. Humm. 1975. Benthic algae of the Anclote Estuary. I. Epiphytes of seagrass leaves.Florida Scientist 38:150–162.Google Scholar
  5. Bayne, B. 1964. Primary and secondary settlement inMytilus edulis L. (Mollusca).Journal of Animal Ecology 33:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayne, B. 1976. The biology of mussel larvae, p. 81–120.In B. L. Bayne (ed.) Marine Mussels: Their Ecology and Physiology. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Beukema, J. andJ. de Vlas. 1989. Tidal-current transport of thread drifting post larval juveniles of the bivalveMacoma balthica form the Wadden Sea to the North Sea.Marine Ecology Progress Series 52:193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balogna, P. A. X. 1998. The effects of seagrass habitat architecture on associated fauna. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama.Google Scholar
  9. Bologna, P. A. X. andK. L. Heck. 1999. Macrofaunal associations with seagrass epiphytes: Relative importance of trophic and structural characteristics.Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 242:21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borum, J., H. Kaas, andS. Wium-Andersen. 1984. Biomass variation and autotrophic production of an epiphyte-macrophyte community in a coastal Danish area: II. Epiphyte species composition, biomass and production.Ophelia 23:165–179.Google Scholar
  11. Brousseau, D. J. 1978. Population dynamics of the solft-shell clamMya arenaria.Marine Biology 50:63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke, R. D. 1986. Pheromones and the gregarious settlement of marine invertebrate larvae.Bulletin of Marine Science 39:323–331.Google Scholar
  13. Butman, C. A. 1987. Larval settlement of soft-sediment invertebrates: The spatial scales of pattern explained by active habitat selection and the emerging role of hydrodynamical processes.Oceanography and Marine Biology Review 25:113–165.Google Scholar
  14. Butman, C. A. 1989. Sediment-trap experiments on the importance of hydrodynamical processes in distributing invertebrate larvae in near-bottom waters.Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 134:37–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butman, C., J. Grassle, andC. Webb. 1988. Substrate choices made by marine larvae settling in still water and in a flume flow.Nature, London 333:771–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calabrese, A. 1969.Mulina lateralis: Molluscan fruit fly?Proceedings of the National Shellfish Association 59:65–66.Google Scholar
  17. Commito, J. A., C. Currier, L. Kane, K. Reinsel, andI. Ulm. 1995. Dispersal dynamics of the bivalveGemma gemma in a patchy environment.Ecological Monographs 65:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eckman, J. E. 1983. Hydrodynamic processes affecting benthic recruitment.Limnology and Oceanography 28:241–257.Google Scholar
  19. Eckman, J. E. 1987. The role of hydrodynamics in recruitment, growth, and survival ofArgopecten irradians (L.) andAnomia simplex (D’Orbigny) within eelgrass meadows.Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 106:165–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eckman, J. E. 1990. A model of passive settlement by planktonic larvae onto bottoms of differing roughness.Limnology and Oceanography 35:887–901.Google Scholar
  21. Emerson, C. W. andJ. Grant. 1991. The control of soft-shell clam (Mya arenaria) recruitment on intertidal sandflats by bedload sediment transport.Limnology and Oceanography 36: 1288–1300.Google Scholar
  22. Fonseca, M. S. andJ. Cahalan. 1992. A preliminary evaluation of wave attenuation by four species of seagrass.Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 35:565–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fonseca, M. S. andJ. S. Fisher. 1986. A comparison of canopy friction and sediment movement between four species of seagrass with reference to their ecology and restoration.Marine Ecology Progress Series 29:15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fonseca, M. S., J. C. Zeiman, G. W. Thayer, andJ. S. Fisher. 1982. Influence of the seagrassZostera marina, on current flow.Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 15:351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallager, S. andR. Mann. 1986. Growth and survival of larvae ofMercenaria mercenaria andCrassostrea virginica relative to brood stock conditioning and lipid content of eggs.Aquaculture 56:105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gambi, M. C., A. Nowell, andP. A. Jumars. 1990. Flume observations on flow dynamics inZostera marina (eelgrass) beds.Marine Ecology Progress Series 61:159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall, M. O. andS. S. Bell. 1993. Meiofauna on the seagrassThalassia testudinum: Population characteristics of harpacticoid copepods and association with algal epiphytes.Marine Biology 116:137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, M., E. Bourget, andR. G. Ingram. 1995. Experimental evidence of passive accumulation of marine bivalve larvae on filamentous epibenthic structures.Limnology and Oceanography 40:94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heijs, F. 1987. Qualitative and quantitative aspects of the epiphytic component in a mixed seagrass meadow from Papua New Guinea.Aquatic Botany 27:363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hidu, H. andH. Haskins. 1978. Swimming speeds of oyster larvae ofCrassostrea virginica in different salinities and temperatures.Estuaries 1:252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iverson, R. L. andH. F. Bittaker. 1986. Seagrass distribution in the eastern Gulf of Mexico.Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 22:577–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jonsson, P., C. Andre, andM. Lindegarth. 1991. Swimming behavior of marine bivalve larvae in a flume boundary-layer flow: Evidence for near-bottom confinement.Marine Ecology Progress Series 79:67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koch, E. W. 1994. Hydrodynamics, diffusion-boundary layers and photosynthesis of the seagrasesThalassia testudinum andCymodocea nodosa.Marine Biology 118:767–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luckenbach, M. 1984. Settlement and early post-settlement survival in the recruitment ofMulinia lateralis (Bivalvia).Marine Ecology Progress Series 17:245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mann, R. 1988. Field studies of bivalve larvae and their recruitment to the benthos: A commentary.Journal of Shellfish Research 7:7–10.Google Scholar
  36. Newell, R. 1989. Species Profiles: Life Histories and Environmental Requirements of Coastal Fishes and Invertebrates (North and Mid-Atlantic)—Blue Mussel. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biology Report 82 (11.102). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR E1-82-4.Google Scholar
  37. Newell, C., H. Hidu, B. McAlice, G. Podniesinski, F. Short, andL. Kindbloom. 1991. Recruitment and commercial seed procurement of the blue musselMytilus edulis in Maine.Journal of World Aquacullure 22:134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Novak, R. 1984. A study in ultra-ecology: Microorganisms of the seagrassPosidonia oceanica (L.) Delile.Pubblicazioni della stazione zoologica di Napoli. I. Marine Ecology 5:143–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olesen, B. andK. Sand-Jensen. 1994. Patch dynamics of eelgrassZostera marina.Marine Ecology Progress Series 106:147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olivier, F., C. Vallet, J. Dauvin, andC. Retiere. 1996. Drifting and post-larvae and juveniles in anAbra alba (Wood) community of the eastern part of the Bay of Seine (English Channel),Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 199:89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orth, R. J. 1977. The importance of sediment stability in seagrass communities, p. 281–300.In B. C. Coull (ed.), Ecology of Marine Benthos. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
  42. Orth, R. J. 1992. A perspective on plant-animal interactions in seagrasses: Physical and biological determinants influencing plant and animal abundance, 46:147–164.In D. John, S. Hawkins, and J. Price (eds.). Plant-Animal Interactions in the Marine Benthos. Systematics Association, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  43. Orth, R. J. andJ. van Montfrans. 1987. Utilization of a seagrass meadow and tidal march creek by blue crabsCallinectes sapidus. I. Seasonal and annual variations in abundance with emphasis on post-settlement juveniles.Marine Ecology Progress Series 41:283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pennington, J. T. 1985. The ecology of fertilization of echinoid eggs: The consequences sperm dilution, adult aggregation and synchronous spawning.Biological Bulletin 169:417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peterson, C. H. 1986. Enhancement ofMercenaria mercenaria densities in seagrass beds: Is pattern fixed during settlement season or altered by subsequent differential survival.Limnology and Oceanography 31:200–205.Google Scholar
  46. Pohle, D. G., V. M. Brocelj, andZ. Garcia-Esquivel. 1991. The eelgrass canopy: An above-bottom refuge from benthic predators for juvenile bay scallopsArgopecten irradians.Marine Ecology Progress Series 74:47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robbins, B. D. andS. S. Bell. 1994. Seagrass landscapes: A terrestrial approach to the marine subtidal environment.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:301–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. SAS. 1996. SAS Version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  49. Savastano, K. J., K. H. Faller, andR. L. Iverson. 1984. Estimating vegetation coverage in St. Joseph Bay. Florida, with an airborne multispectral scanner.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remole Sensing 50:1159–1170.Google Scholar
  50. Sigurdsson, J., C. Titman, andP. Davies. 1976. The dispersal of young post-larval bivalve mollucs by byssus threads.Nature, London 262:386–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snelgrove, P., C. A. Butman, andJ. P. Grassle. 1993. Hydrodynamic enhancement of larval settlement in the bivalveMulinia lateralis (Say) and the polychaeteCapitella sp. 1 in micro-depositional environments.Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 168:71–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thayer, G. W. andH. H. Stuart. 1974. The bay scallop makes its bed of seagrass.Marine Fisheries Review 36:27–30.Google Scholar
  53. Thouzeau, G. 1991a. Experimental collection of postlarvae ofPecten maximus (L.) and other benthic macrofaunal species in the Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Frnace. I. Settlement patterns and biotic interactions among the species collected.Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 148:159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thouzeau, G. 1991b Experimental collection of postlarvae ofPecten maximus (L.) and other benthic macrofaunal species in the Bay of Saint-Brieuc, France. II. Reproduction patterns and postlarval growth of five mollusc species.Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 148:181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tritar, S., D. Prieur, andR. Weiner. 1992. Effects of bacterial films on the settlement of the oysters,Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) andOstrea edulis, (Linnaeus, 1750) and the scallopPecten maximus (Linnaeus, 1758).Journal of Shedlfish Research 11:325–330.Google Scholar
  56. Walters, L. J. 1992. Field settlement locations on subtidal marine hard substrata: Is active larval exploration involved?Limnology and Oceanography 37:1101–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weiczorek, S. K. andC. D. Todd. 1997. Inhibition and facilitation of bryozoan and ascidian settlement by natural multispecies biofilms: Effects of film age and the roles of active and passive larval attachment.Marine Biology 128:463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilson, E. 1990. Temporal and spatial patterns of settlement: A field study of molluscs in Bogue Sound, North Carolina.Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 139:201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul A. X. Bologna
    • 1
  • Kenneth L. Heck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Marine Science Dauphin Island Sea LabUniversity of South AlabamaDauphin Island

Personalised recommendations