, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 425–438 | Cite as

Pattern and process of land loss in the Mississippi Delta: A Spatial and temporal analysis of wetland habitat change

  • John W. Day
  • Louis D. Britsch
  • Suzanne R. Hawes
  • Gary P. Shaffer
  • Denise J. Reed
  • Donald Cahoon


An earlier investigation (Turner 1997) concluded that most of the coastal wetland loss in Louisiana was caused by the effects of canal dredging, that loss was near zero in the absence of canals, and that land loss had decreased to near zero by the late 1990s. This analysis was based on a 15-min quadrangle (approximately 68,000 ha) scale that is too large to isolate processes responsible for small-scale wetland loss and too small to capture those responsible for large-scale loss. We conducted a further evaluation of the relationship between direct loss due to canal dredging and all other loss from 1933–1990 using a spatial scale of 4,100 ha that accurately captures local land-loss processes. Regressions of other wetland loss on canal area (i.e., direct loss) for the Birdfoot, Terrebonne, and Calcasieu basins were not significant. Positive relationships were found for the Breton (r2=0.675), Barataria (r2=0.47), and Mermentau (r2=0.35) basins, indicating that the extent of canals is significantly related to wetland loss in these basins. A significant negative relationship (r2=0.36) was found for the Atchafalaya coastal basin which had statistically lower loss rates than the other basins as a whole. The Atchafalaya area receives direct inflow of about one third of the Mississippi discharge. When the data were combined for all basins, 9.2% of the variation in other wetland loss was attributable to canals. All significant regressions intercepted the y-axis at positive loss values indicating that some loss occurred in the absence of canals. Wetland loss did not differ significantly from the coast inland or between marsh type. We agree with Turner that canals are an important agent in causing wetland loss in coastal Louisiana, but strongly disagree that they are responsible for the vast majority of this loss. We conclude that wetland loss in the Mississippi delta is an ongoing complex process involving several interacting factors and that efforts to create and restore Louisiana’s coastal wetlands must emphasize riverine inputs of freshwater and sediments.


Saltwater Intrusion Wetland Loss Land Loss Riverine Input Mississippi Delta 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Barras, J. A., P. E. Bourgeois, and L. R. Handley. 1994. Land Loss in Coastal Louisiana, 1956–1990. National Biological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center Open File Report 94-01. Lafayette, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, J. M. 1997. Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How it Changed America. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Baumann, R., J. W. Day, andC. Miller. 1984. Mississippi deltatic wetland survival: Sedimentation versus coastal submergence.Science 224:1093–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumann, R. H. andR. E. Turner. 1990. Direct impacts of outer continental shelf activities on wetland loss in the Central Gulf of Mexico.Environmental Geology and Water Resources 15:189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boesch, D., A. Mehta, J. Morris, W. Nuttle, C. Simenstad, andD. Swift. 1994. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana.Journal of Coastal Research special issue 20:1–103.Google Scholar
  6. Boumans, R. M. andJ. W. Day. 1994. Effects of two Louisiana marsh management plans on water and material flux and short term sedimentation.Wetlands 14:247–261.Google Scholar
  7. Britsch, L. D. andJ. B. Dunbar. 1993. Land loss rates: Louisiana coastal plain.Journal of Coastal Research 9:324–338.Google Scholar
  8. Britsch, L. D. andJ. B. Dunbar. 1996. Land Loss in Coastal Louisiana. A Series of Seven Color Maps of Coastal Land Loss. Technical Report GL-90-2, Maps 1–7. U.S. Army Engineer Water ways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi and U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  9. Burkes, D. andY. Dodge. 1993. Alternative Methods of Regression. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Cahoon, D. 1994. Recent accretion in two managed marsh impoundments in coastal Louisiana.Ecological Applications 4:166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cahoon, D. R. and C. G. Groat (eds.). 1990. A Study of Marsh Management Practice in Coastal Louisiana, 3 Volumes. Final report submitted to Minerals Management Service, Contract No. 14-12-0001-30410. OCS Study/MMS 90-0075. New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  12. Cahoon, D., D. J. Reed, andJ. W. Day. 1995a. Estimating shallow subsidence in microtidal salt marshes of the southeastern United States: Kaye and Barghoorn revisited.Marine Geology 128:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cahoon, D., D. Reed, J. W. Day, G. Steyer, R. Boumans, J. Lynch, D. McNally, andN. Latif. 1995b. The influence of Hurricane Andrew on sediment distribution in Louisiana coastal marshes.Journal of Coastal Research 18:280–294.Google Scholar
  14. Chabreck, R. H., T. Joanen, andA. W. Palmisano. 1968. Vegetative Type Map of Louisiana Coastal Marshes. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  15. Chabreck, R. H. andG. Linscombe. 1978. Vegetative Type Map of the Louisiana Coastal Marshes. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  16. Chabreck, R. H. andG. Linscombe. 1988. Vegetative Type Map of the Louisiana Coastal Marshes. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  17. Chabreck, R. H. andA. Palmisano. 1973. The effects of Hurricane Camille on the marshes of the Mississippi River delta.Ecology 54:1118–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Day, Jr,J. W., J. F. Martin, L. Cardoch, andP. H. Templet. 1997. System functioning as a basis for sustainable management of deltaic ecosystems.Coastal Management 25:115–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Day, J. W., D. Pont, P. Hensel, andC. Ibanez. 1995. Impacts of sea level rise on deltas in the Gulf of Mexico and the Mediterranean: The importance of pulsing events to sustainability.Estuaries 18:636–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day, J. W. andP. Templet. 1989. Consequences of sea level rise: Implications from the Mississippi Delta.Coastal Management 17:241–257.Google Scholar
  21. DeLaune, R. D., J. A. Nyman, andW. H. Patrick, Jr. 1994. Peat collapse, ponding and wetland loss in a rapidly submerging coastal marsh.Journal of Coastal Research 10:1021–1030.Google Scholar
  22. Fisk, H. N. 1961. Bar-finger sands of the Mississippi delta, p. 29–52.In. Geometry of Sandstone Bodies. American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  23. Fisk, H. N., E. McFarlan, Jr.,C. R. Kolb, andJ. L. Wilbert, Jr. 1954. Sedimentary framework of the modern Mississippi delta.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 24:76–99.Google Scholar
  24. Gagliano, S., K. Meyer-Arendt, andK. Wicker. 1981. Land loss in the Mississippi River deltaic plain.Transactions Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies 31:295–300.Google Scholar
  25. Gould, H. R. 1970. The Mississippi delta complex, p. 1–30.In J. P. Morgan (ed.), Deltaic Sedimentation: Modern and Ancient. Special Publication 15, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists. Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  26. Grace, J. B. andD. Tilman. 1990. Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  27. Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, andW. C. Black. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings 5th edition. Macmillan, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  29. Hatton, R., R. DeLaune, andW. Patrick. 1983. Sedimentation, accretion, and subsidence in marshes of Barataria Basin, Louisiana.Limnology and Oceanography 28:494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holdahl, S. andN. Morrison. 1974. Regional investigations of vertical crustal movement in the U.S. using precise relevelings and mareograph data.Technophysics 23:373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kemp, P., J. W. Day, D. J. Reed, D. R. Cahoon, andM. Wang. 1999. Predicting effects of sea level rise and sediment supply on surface elevation in an organic rich salt marsh, p. 15–34.In L. P. Rozas, J. A. Nyman, C. E. Proffitt, N. N. Rabalais, D. J. Reed, and R. E. Turner (eds.), Recent Research in Coastal Louisiana. Louisiana Sea Grant, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  32. Kesel, R. H. 1988. The decline of the suspended load of the lower Mississippi river and its influence on adjacent wetlands.Environmental Geological Water Sciences 11:271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kesel, R. H. 1989. The role of the Mississippi River in wetland loss in southeastern Louisiana, U.S.A.Environmental Geological Water Sciences 13:183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kesel, R. H. and D. Reed. 1995. Status and trends in Mississippi River sediment regime and its role in Louisiana wetland development, p. 79–98.In D. J. Reed (ed.) Status and Historical Trends of Hydrologic Modification, Reduction in Sediment Availability, and Habitat Loss/Modification in the Barataria and Terrebonne Estuarine System. Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary Program, Publication No. 20, Thibodeaux, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  35. Kesel, R. H., E. Yodis, andD. McCraw. 1992. An approximation of the sediment budget of the lower Mississippi river prior to major human modification.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 17:711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kolb, C. R. andJ. R. Van Lopik. 1958. Geology of the Mississippi Deltaic Plain—Southeastern Louisiana. U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Technical Report 2:3–482. Vicksburg, Mississippi.Google Scholar
  37. Lane, R. R., J. W. Day, andB. Thibodeaux. 1999. Water quality analysis of a freshwater diversion at Caernarvon, Louisiana.Estuaries 22:327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leibowitz, S. G. 1989. The pattern and process of land loss in coastal Louisiana: A landscape ecological approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  39. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission. 1971. Cooperative Gulf of Mexico Estuarine Inventory and Study, Louisiana. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  40. McKee, K. andI. Mendelssohn. 1989. Response of a freshwater marsh plant community to increased salinity and increased water level.Aquatic Botany 34:301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mendelssohn, I. andK. McKee. 1988.Spartina alterniflora dieback in Louisiana: Time-course investigation of soil waterlogging effects.Journal of Ecology 76:509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morgan, J. P., L. G. Nichols, andM. Wright. 1958. Morphological Effects of Hurricane Audrey on the Louisiana Coast. Technical Report No. 10, Contribution No. 58-3. Louisiana State University, Coastal Studies Institute, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  43. Nyman, J. A., R. D. DeLaune, H. H. Roberts, andW. H. Patrick, Jr. 1993. Relationship between vegetation and soil formation in a rapidly submerging coastal marsh.Marine Ecology Progress Series 96:269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Neil, T. 1949. The Muskrat in the Louisiana Coastal Marshes with Map of the Southern Part of Louisiana Showing Vegetation Types. Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries Commission, Technical Report. New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  45. Penland, S., I. Mendelssohn, L. Wayne, andD. Britsch. 1996. Natural and Human Causes of Coastal Land Loss in Louisiana. Coastal Studies Institute and Wetland Biogeochemistry Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  46. Reed, D. J. 1992. Effect of weirs on sediment deposition in Louisiana coastal marshes.Environmental Management 16:55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reed, D. J. (ed.). 1995. Status and Historical Trends of Hydrologic Modification, Reduction in Sediment Availability, and Habitat Loss/Modification in the Barataria and Terrebonne Estuarine System. Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary Program Publication No. 20, Thibodeaux, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  48. Reed, D. J., N. De Luca, andA. L. Foote. 1997. Effect of hydrologic management on marsh surface sediment deposition in coastal Louisiana.Estuaries 20:301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reyes, E., J. F. Martin, M. L. White, J. W. Day, and G. P. Kemp. in press. Landscape modeling of coastal habitat change in the Mississippi delta.Ecology.Google Scholar
  50. Roberts, H. H. 1997. Dynamic changes of the holocene Mississippi River delta plain: The delta cycle.Journal of Coastal Research 13:605–627.Google Scholar
  51. Roberts, H. H., R. D. Adams, andR. H. W. Cunningham. 1980. Evolution of sand-dominated subaerial phase, Atchafalaya Delta, Louisiana.The American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin 64:264–279.Google Scholar
  52. Shaffer, G. P., C. E. Sasser, J. G. Gosselink, andM. Rejmanek. 1992. Vegetation dynamics in the emergent Atchafalaya Delta, Louisiana, USA.Journal of Ecology 80:677–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sokal, R. andF. Rolhf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edition. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.Google Scholar
  54. Swenson, E. andR. Turner. 1987. Spoil banks: Effects on a coastal marsh water level regime.Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 24:599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Templet, P. andK. Meyer Arendt. 1988. Louisiana wetland loss: A regional water management approach to the problein.Environmental Management 12:181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turner, R. E. 1997. Wetland loss in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Multiple working hypothesis.Estuaries 20:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turner, R. E. and D. Cahoon. 1987. Causes of Wetland Loss in the Coastal Central Gulf of Mexico. Volume 1: Executive Summary, Volume 2: Technical Narrative. Volume 3: Appendices. Coastal Ecology Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. Final Report submitted to the Minerals Management Service, Contract No. 14-12-001-30252. OCS Study/MMS 87-0119. New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  58. van Heerden, I. andH. Roberts. 1980. The Atchafalaya delta—Louisiana’s new prograding coast.Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Soeieties 30:497–506.Google Scholar
  59. Villarubia, C. R. 1998. Ecosystem response to a freshwater diversion: The Caernarvon experience. Abstract. Symposium on Recent Research in Coastal Louisiana: Natural System Function and Response to Human Influences. 3–5 February, Lafayette, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  60. Welder, F. A. 1959. Processes of deltaic sedimentation in the lower Mississippi River. Technical Report 12. Coastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  61. Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Sources of Unpublished Materials

  1. Coastal Environments, Inc. 1972. Environmental Baseline Study, St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana. Prepared for St. Bernard Louisiana Parish Police Jury.Google Scholar
  2. Sasser, C. personal communication. Coastal Ecology Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803.Google Scholar
  3. Suhayda, J. personal communication. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70148.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Day
    • 1
  • Louis D. Britsch
    • 2
  • Suzanne R. Hawes
    • 3
  • Gary P. Shaffer
    • 4
  • Denise J. Reed
    • 5
  • Donald Cahoon
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences Coastal Ecology InstituteLouisiana State UniversityBaton Rouge
  2. 2.New Orleans District, Engineering DivisionU.S. Army Corps of EngineersNew Orleans
  3. 3.New Orleans District, Planning DivisionU. S. Army Corps of EngineersNew Orleans
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesSoutheastern Louisiana UniversityHammond
  5. 5.Department of GeologyUniversity of New OrleansNew Orleans
  6. 6.National Wetlands Research CenterU.S. Geological SurveyLafayette

Personalised recommendations