Estuaries

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 407–415 | Cite as

Sedimentation cycles in a river-mouth tidal freshwater marsh

Article

Abstract

Tidal freshwater marshes are critical buffers that exist at the interface between watersheds and estuaries. Little is known about the physical dynamics of tidal freshwater marsh evolution. Over a 21-mo period, July 1995 to March 1997, measurements were made of biweekly sediment deposition at 23 locations in a 3.8-ha tidal freshwater marsh in the Bush River subestuary of the upper Chesapeake Bay. Biweekly accumulation showed high spatial and temporal variability, ranging from −0.28 g cm−2 to 1.15 g cm−2. Spatial variability is accounted for by habitat differences including plant associations, elevation, and hydrology. Temporal variability is accounted for by interannual climate variability, the growth cycles of marsh plants, stream-marsh interactions, forest-marsh interactions, and animal activity.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Brush, G. S. 1984. Patterns of recent sediment accumulation in Chesapeake Bay (Virginia-Maryland, U.S.A.) tributaries.Chemical Geology 44:227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brush, G. S. 1989. Rates and patterns of estuarine sediment accumulation.Limnology and Oceanography 34:1235–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Defries, R. S. 1986. Effects of land-use history on sedimentation in the Potomac Estuary, Maryland. United States Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2234-K. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Doornkamp, J. C. andC. A. M. King. 1971. Numerical Analysis in Geomorphology: An Introduction. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  5. Dubinski, B. J., R. L. Simpson, andR. E. Good. 1986. The retention of heavy metals in sewage sludge applied to a freshwater tidal wetland.Estuaries 9:102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Findlay, S., K. Howe, andH. K. Austin. 1990. Comparison of detritus dynamics in two tidal freshwater wetlands.Ecology 71: 288–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freund, J. E. andG. A. Simon. 1991. Statistics: A First Course, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Gottschalk, L. C. 1945. Effects of soil erosion on navigation in upper Chesapeake Bay.Geographical Review 35:219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hilgartner, W. B. 1995. Habitat development in a freshwater tidal wetland: A paleoecological study of human and natural influences. Ph.D. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  10. Hupp, C. R. andD. E. Bazemore. 1993. Temporal and spatial patterns of wetland sedimentation, West Tennessee.Journal of Hydrology 141:179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jordan, T. E., J. W. Pierce, andD. L. Correll. 1986. Flux of particulate matter in the tidal marshes and subtidal shallows of the Rhode River Estuary.Estuaries 9:310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan, H. andG. S. Brush. 1994. Nutrient and metal accumulation in a freshwater tidal marsh.Estuaries 17:345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marcus, W. A. andM. S. Kearney. 1991. Upland and coastal sediment sources in a Chesapeake Bay estuary.Annuls of the Association of American Geographers 81:408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, R. L. andJ. S. Kahn. 1962. Statistical Analysis in the Geological Sciences. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Odum, W. E. 1988. Comparative ecology of tidal freshwater and salt mashes.Annual Review of Ecological Systems 19:147–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Orson, R. A., R. L. Simpson, andR. E. Good. 1990. Rates of sediment accumulation in a tidal freshwater marsh.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 60:859–869.Google Scholar
  17. Orson, R. A., R. L. Simpson, andR. E. Good. 1992. The paleoecological development of a late Holocene, tidal freshwater marsh of the upper Delaware River estuary.Estuaries 15:130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reyment, R. A. 1971. Introduction to Quantitative Palaeoecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. Reed, D. J. 1989. Patterns of sediment deposition in subsiding coastal salt marshes, Terrebonne Bay, Louisiana: The role of winter storms.Estuaries 12:222–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roberts, W. P. andJ. W. Pierce. 1976. Deposition in Upper Patuxent Estuary, Maryland, 1968–1969.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 4:267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rozas, L. P. andW. E. Odum. 1987. Use of tidal freshwater marshes by fishes and macrofaunal crustaceans along a marsh stream-order gradient.Estuaries 10:36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Serodes, B. andP. Troude. 1984. Sedimentation cycle of a freshwater tidal flat in the St. Lawrence Estuary.Estuaries 7:119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simpson, R. L., R. E. Good, R. A. Leck, andD. F. Whigham. 1983a. The ecology of freshwater tidal wetlands.Bioscience 33:255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simpson, R. L., R. E. Good, R. Walker, andB. R. Frasco. 1983b. The role of Delaware River freshwater tidal wetlands in the retention of nutrients and heavy metals.Journal of Environmental Quality 12:41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Till, R. 1974. Statistical Methods for the Earth Scientist: An Introduction. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Whigham, D. F., R. L. Simpson, R. E. Good, andF. A. Sickels. 1989. Decomposition and nutrient-metal dynamics of litter in freshwater tidal wetlands, p. 167–188.In R. R. Sharitz and J. W. Gibbons (eds.), Freshwater Wetlands and Wildlife. United States Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  27. Wolaver, T. G., J. C. Zieman, R. Wetzel, andK. L. Webb. 1983. Tidal exchange of nitrogen and phosphorus between a mesohaline vegetated marsh and the surrounding estuary in the Lower Chesapeake Bay.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 16:321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental EngineeringThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore

Personalised recommendations